skip to main content
10.1145/3148330.3148344acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgroupConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Danmaku vs. Forum Comments: Understanding User Participation and Knowledge Sharing in Online Videos

Published: 07 January 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Danmaku is a new video comment feature that is gaining popularity. Unlike typical forum comments that are displayed with user names below videos, danmaku comments are overlaid on the screen of videos without showing users' information. Prior work studied forum comments and danmaku separately, and little work compared how these two features were used. We collected 38,399 danmaku comments and 16,414 forum comments posted in 2017 on 30 popular videos on Bilibili.com. We examined the usage of these two features in terms of user participation, language used, and ways of sharing knowledge. We found that more users posted danmaku comments, and they also posted these more frequently than forum comments. Even though, in total, more negative language was used in danmaku comments than in forum comments, active users appeared to post more positive comments in danmaku. There was no such correlation in forum comments. It is interesting to find that danmaku and forum comments enabled knowledge sharing in a complementary manner, where danmaku comments involved more explicit knowledge sharing and forum comments exhibited more tacit knowledge sharing. We discuss design implications to promote social interactions for online video systems.

References

[1]
Syed Sibte Raza Abidi, Salah Hussini, Wimorat Sriraj, Somboon Thienthong, and Allen G Finley. 2009. Knowledge sharing for pediatric pain management via a Web 2.0 framework. In MIE. 287--291.
[2]
Rami A Al-Sa'Di and Jihad M Hamdan. 2005. "Synchronous online chat" English: Computer-mediated communication. World Englishes 24, 4 (2005), 409--424.
[3]
Dorine C Andrews. 2002. Audience-specific online community design. Commun. ACM 45, 4 (2002), 64--68.
[4]
Baidu Baike. 2017. Danmaku Terms. http://baike.baidu.com/item/%E5%BC%B9%E5%B9%95% E6%9C%AF%E8%AF%AD/18061202?fr=aladdin. (2017). Accessed by 07/02/2017.
[5]
Bilibili. 2009. Bilibili Danmaku Video Website. (2009). http://www.bilibili.com/ Accessed by 07/02/2017.
[6]
John Seely Brown and Paul Duguid. 1998. Organizing knowledge. California management review 40, 3 (1998), 90--111.
[7]
Pablo Cesar and David Geerts. 2011. Past, present, and future of social TV: A categorization. In Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (CCNC), 2011 IEEE. IEEE, 347--351.
[8]
Yue Chen, Qin Gao, and Pei-Luen Patrick Rau. 2015. Understanding Gratifications of Watching Danmaku Videos--Videos with Overlaid Comments. In International Conference on Cross-Cultural Design. Springer, 153--163.
[9]
Seungwoo Choi and Aviv Segev. 2016. Finding informative comments for video viewing. In Big Data (Big Data), 2016 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 2457--2465.
[10]
Kimberly M Christopherson. 2007. The positive and negative implications of anonymity in Internet social interactions: "On the Internet, Nobody Knows You're a Dog". Computers in Human Behavior 23, 6 (2007), 3038--3056.
[11]
Ritesh Chugh. 2015. Do Australian Universities Encourage Tacit Knowledge Transfer? In KMIS. 128--135.
[12]
Tessa Dwyer. 2012. Fansub Dreaming on ViKi: "Don't Just Watch But Help When You Are Free". The Translator 18, 2 (2012), 217--243.
[13]
Yangchun Fu. 2014. The Studies of Bullet Curtain Language in Bilibili. (November 2014).
[14]
Russell Haines, Jill Hough, Lan Cao, and Douglas Haines. 2014. Anonymity in computer-mediated communication: More contrarian ideas with less influence. Group Decision and Negotiation (2014), 1--22.
[15]
Maxwell F Harper, Daniel Moy, and Joseph A Konstan. 2009. Facts or friends?: distinguishing informational and conversational questions in social Q&A sites. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 759--768.
[16]
Shwu-Min Horng. 2016. A study of active and passive user participation in virtual communities. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research 17, 4 (2016).
[17]
Craig D Howard, Andrew F Barrett, and Theodore W Frick. 2010. Anonymity to promote peer feedback: Pre-service teachers' comments in asynchronous computer-mediated communication. Journal of Educational Computing Research 43, 1 (2010), 89--112.
[18]
Stefan Hrastinski. 2008. The potential of synchronous communication to enhance participation in online discussions: A case study of two e-learning courses. Information & Management 45, 7 (2008), 499--506.
[19]
Huixian Huang and Jie Zhu. 2015. Danmaku Community's Meaning Construction and Psychological Needs to Danmaku Language. Young Journalists 9 (2015), 73--74.
[20]
Yun Huang, Yifeng Huang, Na Xue, and Jeffrey P Bigham. 2017. Leveraging Complementary Contributions of Different Workers for Efficient Crowdsourcing of Video Captions. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 4617--4626.
[21]
Yeonwook Im and Okhwa Lee. 2003. Pedagogical implications of online discussion for preservice teacher training. Journal of research on technology in education 36, 2 (2003), 155--170.
[22]
Seung-A Annie Jin and Namkee Park. 2009. Parasocial interaction with my avatar: Effects of interdependent self-construal and the mediating role of self-presence in an avatar-based console game, Wii. CyberPsychology & Behavior 12, 6 (2009), 723--727.
[23]
Peter G Kilner and Christopher M Hoadley. 2005. Anonymity options and professional participation in an online community of practice. In Proceedings of the 2005 conference on Computer support for collaborative learning: learning 2005: the next 10 years! International Society of the Learning Sciences, 272--280.
[24]
Alice Lam. 2000. Tacit knowledge, organizational learning and societal institutions: An integrated framework. Organization studies 21, 3 (2000), 487--513.
[25]
Alexander Leichtle. 2012. The Games-Howell Test in R. (2012). http://www.gcf.dkf.unibe.ch/BCB/files/ BCB_10Jan12_Alexander.pdf Accessed by 10/01/2012.
[26]
Chen Li. 2015. Can danmaku interation be introduced into live telecast? News World 95--96 (2015), 80--80.
[27]
X Liu and G de Seta. 2014. Chinese fansub groups as communites of practice: an ethnography of online language learning. Asien: the German journal on contemporary Asia (2014).
[28]
Xiaojuan Ma and Nan Cao. 2017a. Video-based Evanescent, Anonymous, Asynchronous Social Interaction: Motivation and Adaption to Medium. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. ACM, 770--782.
[29]
Xiaojuan Ma and Nan Cao. 2017b. Video-based Evanescent, Anonymous, Asynchronous Social Interaction: Motivation and Adaption to Medium. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 770--782.
[30]
Zhihao Ma and Jinping Ge. 2014. The Review of The Japanese Animation Barrage: A Perspective of Parasocial Interaction. Journal of International Communication 8 (2014), 116--130.
[31]
Mark Mabrito. 2006. A study of synchronous versus asynchronous collaboration in an online business writing class. The American Journal of Distance Education 20, 2 (2006), 93--107.
[32]
Amy Madden, Ian Ruthven, and David McMenemy. 2013. A classification scheme for content analyses of YouTube video comments. Journal of documentation 69, 5 (2013), 693--714.
[33]
Moegirlpedia. 2017. Danmaku Terminologies. (2017). https://zh.moegirl.org/%E5%BC%B9%E5%B9%95 Accessed by 07/02/2017.
[34]
Helen Nissenbaum. 1999. The meaning of anonymity in an information age. The Information Society 15, 2 (1999), 141--144.
[35]
Rachel O'Donovan. 2016. "To boldly go where no psychologist has gone before": effects of participation in fandom activities on parasocial relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology and Social Science 2, 1 (2016), 41--61.
[36]
Eli Omernick and Sara Owsley Sood. 2013. The impact of anonymity in online communities. In Social Computing (SocialCom), 2013 International Conference on. IEEE, 526--535.
[37]
David Osimo. 2008. Web 2.0 in government: Why and how. Institute for Prospectice Technological Studies (IPTS), JRC, European Commission, EUR 23358 (2008).
[38]
Xiaofu Ouyang. 2016. Study on Xiamen Tourist Environment Image Based on Visitors' Microblog Data Analysis. Ph.D. Dissertation. Xiamen University.
[39]
Sirous Panahi, Jason Watson, and Helen Partridge. 2012. Social media and tacit knowledge sharing: Developing a conceptual model. World academy of science, engineering and technology 64 (2012), 1095--1102.
[40]
Lionel P Robert and Alan R Dennis. 2005. Paradox of richness: A cognitive model of media choice. IEEE transactions on professional communication 48, 1 (2005), 10--21.
[41]
Hamano Satoshi. 2008. How information systems have been designed so far. In Architecture of the Ecosystem. BIGART. ISBN: 978--4--7571-0245--3.
[42]
Katharina Steininger, David Ruckel, Ewald Dannerer, and Friedrich Roithmayr. 2010. Healthcare knowledge transfer through a web 2.0 portal: an Austrian approach. International Journal of Healthcare Technology and Management 11, 1--2 (2010), 13--30.
[43]
Emily Sun, Rodrigo de Oliveira, and Joshua Lewandowski. 2017. Challenges on the Journey to Co-Watching YouTube. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. ACM, 783--793.
[44]
John C Tang, Gina Venolia, and Kori M Inkpen. 2016. Meerkat and periscope: I stream, you stream, apps stream for live streams. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 4770--4780.
[45]
Yan Tang, Yibing Gong, Li Xu, Qingheng Zhang, Huaxin Liu, Sheng Wang, Qian Wang, and Xiaofeng Gao. 2017. Is Danmaku an Effective Way for Promoting Event based Social Network?. In Companion of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. ACM, 319--322.
[46]
Mike Thelwall, Pardeep Sud, and Farida Vis. 2012. Commenting on YouTube videos: From Guatemalan rock to el big bang. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 63, 3 (2012), 616--629.
[47]
Yuan Tian. 2011. Fansub cyber culture in China. Georgetown University.
[48]
Peiyun Tu, Meiling Chen, Chilan Yang, and Haochuan Wang. 2016. Co-Viewing Room: Mobile TV Content Sharing in Social Chat. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1615--1621.
[49]
Cindy Boyles Tucey. 2010. Online vs. face-to-face deliberation on the global warming and stem cell issues. (2010).
[50]
Dorothy Van Soest, Robert Canon, and Darlene Grant. 2000. Using an interactive website to educate about cultural diversity and societal oppression. Journal of Social Work Education 36, 3 (2000), 463--479.
[51]
Anthony J Viera, Joanne M Garrett, and others. 2005. Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med 37, 5 (2005), 360--363.
[52]
Jerry Wellman. 2009. Organizational learning: How companies and institutions manage and apply knowledge. Springer.
[53]
Yaxing Yao, Jennifer Bort, and Yun Huang. 2017. Understanding Danmaku's Potential in Online Video Learning. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3034--3040.
[54]
Bingjie Yu and Leon Watts. 2017. Designing Commenting Mechanisms for Dynamic Media: Synchronous Overlay and Adjacent Scrollable. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems. ACM, 18--22.

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Unveiling learners’ intentions toward influencer-led education: an integration of qualitative and quantitative analysisInteractive Learning Environments10.1080/10494820.2024.2444533(1-19)Online publication date: 31-Jan-2025
  • (2024)The Feature and Diversity of Learners' Performance on Different MOOC Forums in the Online Learning EraInternational Journal of Distance Education Technologies10.4018/IJDET.35026722:1(1-21)Online publication date: 8-Aug-2024
  • (2024)Research on Predictive Model Construction Based on Online ReviewsOperations Research and Fuzziology10.12677/orf.2024.14217714:02(766-779)Online publication date: 2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Danmaku vs. Forum Comments: Understanding User Participation and Knowledge Sharing in Online Videos

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    GROUP '18: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work
    January 2018
    422 pages
    ISBN:9781450355629
    DOI:10.1145/3148330
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 07 January 2018

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. anonymous
    2. danmaku comments
    3. explicit knowledge
    4. forum comments
    5. knowledge sharing
    6. synchronous
    7. tacit knowledge

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    GROUP '18
    Sponsor:
    GROUP '18: 2018 ACM Conference on Supporting Groupwork
    January 7 - 10, 2018
    Florida, Sanibel Island, USA

    Acceptance Rates

    GROUP '18 Paper Acceptance Rate 22 of 94 submissions, 23%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 125 of 405 submissions, 31%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)197
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)19
    Reflects downloads up to 22 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2025)Unveiling learners’ intentions toward influencer-led education: an integration of qualitative and quantitative analysisInteractive Learning Environments10.1080/10494820.2024.2444533(1-19)Online publication date: 31-Jan-2025
    • (2024)The Feature and Diversity of Learners' Performance on Different MOOC Forums in the Online Learning EraInternational Journal of Distance Education Technologies10.4018/IJDET.35026722:1(1-21)Online publication date: 8-Aug-2024
    • (2024)Research on Predictive Model Construction Based on Online ReviewsOperations Research and Fuzziology10.12677/orf.2024.14217714:02(766-779)Online publication date: 2024
    • (2024)Towards Inclusive Video Commenting: Introducing Signmaku for the Deaf and Hard-of-HearingProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642287(1-18)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2024)Combining Danmaku and Discussion Boards: Toward A Scalable and Sociable Environment for Mass Collaboration in MOOCsInternational Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning10.1007/s11412-024-09426-319:3(311-339)Online publication date: 5-Jun-2024
    • (2024)Boosting e-commerce sales with live streaming: the power of barragesElectronic Commerce Research10.1007/s10660-024-09913-7Online publication date: 16-Oct-2024
    • (2024)Why College Students Prefer to Study on Online Video-Sharing Platforms: The Case of Bilibili PlatformE-Business. New Challenges and Opportunities for Digital-Enabled Intelligent Future10.1007/978-3-031-60264-1_15(167-178)Online publication date: 23-May-2024
    • (2023)Let’s Play Together through Channels: Understanding the Practices and Experience of Danmaku Participation Game Players in ChinaProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36110597:CHI PLAY(1025-1043)Online publication date: 4-Oct-2023
    • (2023)MirrorUs: Mirroring Peers' Affective Cues to Promote Learner's Meta-Cognition in Video-based LearningProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36100797:CSCW2(1-25)Online publication date: 4-Oct-2023
    • (2023)Malicious Selling Strategies in Livestream E-commerce: A Case Study of Alibaba’s Taobao and ByteDance’s TikTokACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/357719930:3(1-29)Online publication date: 10-Jun-2023
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media