skip to main content
10.1145/3148675.3148707acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobicomConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

CUMAC-CAM: Addressing Triple Hidden Terminal Problems for Multi-channel Transmission in Underwater Sensor Networks

Authors Info & Claims
Published:06 November 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

As multi-channel communication is becoming more and more common in Radio Frequency (RF) arena, acoustic communication protocols have also started to adopt the same concept to utilize multiple channels in Underwater Sensor Networks (UWSN). Although the deployment of multi-channel increases throughput significantly, it also opens up the possibility of collision occurrence due to the hidden terminal problem. In particular, the "Triple Hidden Terminal (THT)" problems, a phenomenon characterized by collision occurrence due to multi-hop, multi-channel communication with long propagation delay, persists more dominantly in UWSN. Existing MAC protocols try to mitigate the adverse effect of THT without utilizing the information of propagation delay that may be exploited to improve the performance of UWSN significantly. The current work proposes a Cooperative Underwater Multi-Channel MAC protocol with Channel Allocation Matrix (CUMAC-CAM). A new Channel Allocation Matrix (CAM) has been introduced for estimating propagation delay to ensure enhanced channel utilization. In this scheme, each node maintains a delay mapping database, based on which senders and receivers perform a scheduling algorithm before initiating any transmission. This mapping helps a node to predict whether it's upcoming packet transmission will collide with other nodes' transmission or not. In brief, the objective is to ensure successful transmission by mitigating triple hidden terminal problems in multi-channel underwater sensor networks as well as to enhance the channel utilization with the benefit of delay mapping and channel allocation assessment. Simulation results, carried out for performance analysis, show that the proposed MAC protocol is more efficient in terms of network throughput, energy consumption, end to end delay and packet delivery ratio compared to the contemporary CUMAC protocol.

References

  1. Ian F Akyildiz, Dario Pompili, and Tommaso Melodia. 2004. Challenges for efficient communication in underwater acoustic sensor networks. ACM Sigbed Review 1, 2 (2004), 3--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Ian F Akyildiz, Dario Pompili, and Tommaso Melodia. 2005. Underwater acoustic sensor networks: research challenges. Ad hoc networks 3, 3 (2005), 257--279.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Keyu Chen, Maode Ma, En Cheng, Fei Yuan, and Wei Su. 2014. A survey on MAC protocols for underwater wireless sensor networks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 16, 3 (2014), 1433--1447.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Guangjie Han, Jinfang Jiang, Lei Shu, Yongjun Xu, and Feng Wang. 2012. Localization algorithms of underwater wireless sensor networks: A survey. Sensors 12, 2 (2012), 2026--2061.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Ramiro Liscano, Guanlilng Chen, Daqing Zhang, and Xingshe Zhou. 2010. Ubiquitous Intelligence and Computing. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Youngtae Noh, Uichin Lee, Seongwon Han, Paul Wang, Dustin Torres, Jinwhan Kim, and Mario Gerla. 2014. DOTS: A propagation delay-aware opportunistic MAC protocol for mobile underwater networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing 13, 4 (2014), 766--782. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Jim Partan, Jim Kurose, and Brian Neil Levine. 2007. A survey of practical issues in underwater networks. ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Communications Review 11, 4 (2007), 23--33. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Yishan Su and Zhigang Jin. 2016. UMMAC: A multi-channel MAC protocol for underwater acoustic networks. Journal of communications and networks 18, 1 (2016), 75--83.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Affan A Syed, Wei Ye, and John Heidemann. 2008. T-Lohi: A new class of MAC protocols for underwater acoustic sensor networks. In INFOCOM 2008. The 27th Conference on Computer Communications. IEEE. IEEE, 231--235.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Peng Xie, Jun-Hong Cui, and Li Lao. 2006. VBF: vector-based forwarding protocol for underwater sensor networks. In International Conference on Research in Networking. Springer, 1216--1221. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Yang Yu, Jie Shi, and Ke He. 2014. A multichannel MAC protocol for underwater acoustic sensor networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Underwater Networks & Systems. ACM, 2. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Zhong Zhou, Zheng Peng, Jun-Hong Cui, and Zaihan Jiang. 2012. Handling triple hidden terminal problems for multichannel MAC in long-delay underwater sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing 11, 1 (2012), 139--154. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. CUMAC-CAM: Addressing Triple Hidden Terminal Problems for Multi-channel Transmission in Underwater Sensor Networks

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            WUWNet '17: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Underwater Networks & Systems
            November 2017
            144 pages
            ISBN:9781450355612
            DOI:10.1145/3148675

            Copyright © 2017 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 6 November 2017

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate84of180submissions,47%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader