Abstract
Complex electronic systems include multiple power domains and drastically varying dynamic power consumption patterns, requiring the use of multiple power conversion and regulation units. High-frequency switching converters have been gaining prominence in the DC-DC converter market due to their high efficiency and smaller form factor. Unfortunately, they are also subject to higher process variations, and faster in-field degradation, jeopardizing stable operation of the power supply. This article presents a technique to track changes in the dynamic loop characteristics of DC-DC converters without disturbing the normal mode of operation using a white noise–based excitation and correlation. Using multiple points for injection and analysis, we show that the degraded part can be diagnosed to take remedial action. White noise excitation is generated via a pseudo-random disturbance at reference, load current, and pulse-width modulation (PWM) nodes of the converter with the test signal energy being spread over a wide bandwidth, without significantly affecting the converter noise and ripple floor. The impulse response is extracted by correlating the random input sequence with the disturbed output generated. Test signal analysis is achieved by correlating the pseudo-random input sequence with the output response and thereby accumulating the desired behavior over time and pulling it above the noise floor of the measurement set-up. An off-the-shelf power converter, LM27402, is used as the device-under-test (DUT) for experimental verification. Experimental results show that the proposed technique can estimate converter natural frequency and quality factor (Q-factor) within ±2.5% and ±0.7% error margin respectively, over changes in load inductance and capacitance. For the diagnosis purpose, a measure of inductor's DC resistance (DCR) value, which is the inductor's series resistance and indicative of the degradation in inductor's Q-factor, is estimated within less than ±1.6% error margin.
- N. Kurd, M. Chowdhury, E. Burton, T. P. Thomas, C. Mozak, B. Boswell, P. Mosalikanti, M. Neidengard, A. Deval, A. Khanna, N. Chowdhury, R. Rajwar, T. M. Wilson and R. Kumar. 2014. Haswell: A family of IA 22 nm processors. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference (ISSCC) Digest Technical Papers. 112--113.Google Scholar
- W. G. Hurley and W. H. Wolfe. 2013. Transformers and Inductors for Power Electronics: Theory, Design and Applications (1st ed.). Wiley 8 Sons.Google Scholar
- T. Liu, C. Fu, S. Ozev, and B. Bakkaloglu. 2014. A built-in self-test technique for load inductance and lossless current sensing of DC-DC converters. In Proceedings of the IEEE 32nd VLSI Test Symposium. 1--6.Google Scholar
- L. Ljung. 1999. System Identification: Theory for the User (2nd ed.). Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J. Google ScholarDigital Library
- G. F. Franklin, J. D. Powell, and M. L. Workman. 1997. Digital Control of Dynamic Systems (3rd ed.). Addison-Wesley. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Maksimovic. 2000. Computer-aided small-signal analysis based on impulse response of DC/DC switching power converters. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics 15, 6 (Nov. 2000), 1183--1191.Google ScholarCross Ref
- B. Johansson and M. Lenells. 2000. Possibilities of obtaining small-signal models of DC-to-DC power converters by means of system identification. In Proceedings of the IEEE 22nd Telecommunications Energy Conference. 65--75.Google Scholar
- P. Huynh and B. H. Cho. 1995. Empirical small-signal modeling of switching converters using PSpice. In Proceedings of the IEEE 26th Power Electronics Specialists Conference (Jun. 1995), 801--808.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Costabeber, P. Mattavelli, S. Saggini, and A. Bianco. 2011. Digital autotuning of DC-DC converters based on a model reference impulse response. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics 26, 10 (Oct. 2011), 2915--2924.Google ScholarCross Ref
- X. Wang, K. Blanchard, S. Estella, and A. Chatterjee. 2014. Alternative “safe” test of hysteretic power converters. In Proceedings of the IEEE 32nd VLSI Test Symposium (Apr. 2014), 1--6.Google Scholar
- B. Miao, R. Zane, and D. Maksimovic. 2005. System identification of power converters with digital control through cross-correlation methods. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics 20, 5 (Sept. 2005), 1093--1099.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Barkley and E. Santi. 2009. Improved online identification of a DC-DC converter and its control loop gain using cross-correlation methods. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics 24, 8 (Aug. 2009), 2021--2031.Google ScholarCross Ref
- T. Roinila, T. Helin, M. Vilkko, T. Suntio, and H. Koivisto. 2009. Circular correlation based identification of switching power converter with uncertainty analysis using fuzzy density approach. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory 17, 6 (July 2009), 1043--1058.Google ScholarCross Ref
- E. Pazouki, J. A. De Abreu-Garcia, and Y. Sozer. 2016. Fault diagnosis method for DC-DC converters based on the inductor current emulator. In Proceedings of the IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (Sept. 2016), 1--6.Google Scholar
- K. Yao, W. Tang, W. Hu, and J. Lyu. 2015. A current-sensorless online ESR and C identification method for output capacitor of buck converter. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics 30, 12 (Dec. 2015), 6993--7005.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Shirazi, R. Zane, and D. Maksimovic. 2009. An autotuning digital controller for DC--DC power converters based on online frequency-response measurement. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics 24, 11 (Nov. 2009), 2578--2588.Google ScholarCross Ref
- V. Aggarwal, M. Mao, and U.-M. O’Reilly. 2006. A self-tuning analog proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controller. In Proceedings of the IEEE 1st NASA/ESA Conference on Adaptive Hardware and Systems. 12--19. Google ScholarDigital Library
- N. Beohar, P. Bakliwal, S. Roy, D. Mandal, P. Adell, B. Vermeire, B. Bakkaloglu and S. Ozev. 2015. Disturbance-free BIST for loop characterization of DC-DC buck converters. In Proceedings of the IEEE 33rd VLSI Test Symposium. 1--6.Google Scholar
- R. W. Erickson and D. Maksimovic. 2001. Fundamentals of Power Electronics (2nd ed.). Kluwer, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
- R. Ahmadi, D. Paschedag and M. Ferdowsi. 2010. Closed-loop input and output impedances of DC-DC switching converters operating in voltage and current mode control. In Proceedings of the IEEE 36th Industrial Electronics Society (Nov. 2010), 2311--2316.Google Scholar
- K. R. Godfrey. 1991. Introduction to binary signals used in system identification. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Control. 161--166.Google Scholar
- B. H. Karnopp and F. E. Fisher. 1990. Determination of vibration parameters in moderately damped systems. Journal of the Franklin Institute 327, 4 (1990), 611--620.Google ScholarCross Ref
- N. Beohar, V. N. K. Malladi, D. Mandal, S. Ozev, and B. Bakkaloglu. 2017. Online built-in self-test of high switching frequency DC-DC converters using model reference based system identification techniques. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I, Regular Papers 99, 1--14.Google Scholar
- A. Boyer, H. Huang, and S. Ben Dhia. 2014. Impact of thermal aging on emission of a buck DC-DC converter. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility. 77--80.Google Scholar
- H. Huang, A. Boyer, and S. Ben Dhia. 2015. Analysis and modeling of passive device degradation for a long-term electromagnetic emission study of a DC--DC converter. Microelectronics Reliability, 55, 9-10 (Jun. 2015), 2061--2066.Google ScholarCross Ref
- K. J. Åström. 1987. Adaptive feedback control. Proceedings of IEEE 75, 2 (Feb. 1987), 185--217.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Texas Instruments. 2013. AN-1992 LM27402 evaluation board: User’s guide. Retrieved from https://www.ti.com/lit/ug/snva406b/snva406b.pdf.Google Scholar
- H. Wang, S. Kulkarni, and S. Tragoudas. 2004. Online testing field programmable analog array circuits. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Test Conference (Oct. 2004), 1340--1348. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- A Disturbance-Free Built-In Self-Test and Diagnosis Technique for DC-DC Converters
Recommendations
A High PSRR CMOS Bandgap Reference for DC-DC Converters
ICECC '12: Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Electronics, Communications and ControlThis paper presents a high power supply rejection ratio (PSRR) CMOS band gap reference (BGR) for DC-DC converter. This circuit is designed and simulated in the CSMC 0.5µm CMOS process technology. Simulation results show that The PSRR of the proposed BGR ...
Two-switch flyback PWM DC–DC converter in discontinuous-conduction mode
The two-switch flyback DC–DC converter is an extended version of the conventional single-switch flyback converter. An additional switch and two clamping diodes serve as a simple, but an effective way to limit the switch overvoltages, which occur in the ...
Comments