skip to main content
10.1145/3152494.3167982acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescodsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

A comparative study of feature extraction methods from user reviews for recommender systems

Published:11 January 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

The Recommender systems technology is being massively exploited by e-commerce giants to enhance the shopping experience of their clients which in turn helps in improving the sales of the company. Most of the recommender systems in use today are based on Collaborative Filtering (CF) in which the known preferences of a group of users are used to make recommendations or predictions for the unknown preferences of other users. Although these ratings communicate about the quality of the product, they almost most of the times fail to express the reason behind people believing the product to be of a particular quality. This information can be inferred if analyze the information rich textual reviews written by the users.

In the current work, an attempt is made to study and implement various methods described in literature, to mine the product features from the user reviews associated with the product. A comparative study is presented at the end to appreciate the performance of the methods.

References

  1. Rakesh Agrawal and Ramakrishnan Srikant. 1994. Fast Algorithms for Mining Association Rules. Proceedings of the 20th VLDB Conference Santiago, Chile (1994). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Ruihai Dong, Kevin McCarthy, Michael P. O'Mahony, Markus Schaal, and Barry Smyth. 2012. Towards an Intelligent Reviewer's Assistant: Recommending Topics to Help Users to Write Better Product Reviews. IUI'12, Lisbon, Portugal (2012). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Ruihai Dong, Markus Schaal, Kevin McCarthy Michael P. O'Mahony, and Barry Smyth. 2012. Unsupervised Topic Extraction for the Reviewer's Assistant. Springer-Verlag London (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Ruihai Dong, Markus Schaal, Michael P. O'Mahony, and Barry Smyth. 2013. Topic Extraction from Online Reviews for Classification and Recommendation. Proceedings of the Twenty-Third International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2013). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Ruining He and Julian McAuley. 2016. Ups and downs: Modeling the visual evolution of fashion trends with oneclass collaborative filtering. WWW (2016). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Minqing Hu and Bing Liu. 2004. Mining and Summarizing Customer Reviews. Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD-2004) (2004). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Cane Wing ki Leung, Stephen Chi-fai, Chan Fu-lai, and Chung Grace Ngai. 2011. A probabilistic rating inference framework for mining user preferences from reviews. World Wide Web (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Raksha Sharma, Mohit Gupta, Astha Agarwal, and Pushpak Bhattacharyya. 2015. Adjective Intensity and Sentiment Analysis. Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (2015).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Ann Taylor, Mitchell Marcus, and Beatrice Santorini. 2003. The Penn Treebank: An Overview. In: Abeille A. (eds) Treebanks. Text, Speech and Language Technology, vol 20. Springer, Dordrecht (2003).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Kristina Toutanova, Dan Klein, Christopher Manning,, and Yoram Singer. 2003. Feature-Rich Part-of-Speech Tagging with a Cyclic Dependency Network. In Proceedings of HLTNAACL (2003). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Lei Zhang and Bing Liu. 2011. Identifying Noun Product Features that Imply Opinions. Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics:shortpapers (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A comparative study of feature extraction methods from user reviews for recommender systems

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        CODS-COMAD '18: Proceedings of the ACM India Joint International Conference on Data Science and Management of Data
        January 2018
        379 pages
        ISBN:9781450363419
        DOI:10.1145/3152494

        Copyright © 2018 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 11 January 2018

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • short-paper

        Acceptance Rates

        CODS-COMAD '18 Paper Acceptance Rate50of150submissions,33%Overall Acceptance Rate197of680submissions,29%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader