ABSTRACT
Despite a huge stream of the experimental data, allowing us to estimate ionospheric parameters in near real time, necessity for ionospheric modeling does not decrease. Transition to developing a model of the most changeable structure - the main ionospheric trough (MIT) was now outlined. The latest model is the Karpatchev and co-authors's model of 2016 which concerns night winter conditions (the most probable occurrence of a trough). The model is constructed according to vertical sounding and measurements of plasma frequency on satellites. As the increasing role in an estimation of ionospheric conditions is played by the total electron content (TEC), in the present paper the problem of comparison of TEC behaviour with the MIT model was put. It is shown, that TEC always shows presence of the trough however its form is more smoothed. Good enough conformity exists for longitudinal dependence of MIT, but latitudinal dependence of the TEC trough is closer to data of low-orbit satellites. Testing of the International Reference Ionosphere model is a traditional problem. In the present paper, the basic attention was given to conformity of ionospheric and plasma frequencies at height of the satellite and to use TEC. It is shown, that the usage of TEC increases accuracy of definition of critical frequencies in 1.5 times in comparison with the model in a range 5° on a latitude and 90° on a longitude from ionosondes.
- J.M. Goodman. 2005. Operational communication systems and relationships to the ionosphere and space weather. Adv. Space Res. 36 (2005), 2241--2252.Google ScholarCross Ref
- N. Yang, H. Le, and L. Liu. 2015. Statistical analysis of ionospheric mid-latitude trough over the Northern Hemisphere derived from GPS total electron content data. Earth, Planets and Space, 67 (2015), 196.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D.B. Muldrew. 1965. F-layer ionization troughs deduced from Alouette data. Geophys. Res., 70(11). (1965), 2635--2650.Google Scholar
- J. Lei, J. Zhong, T. Mao, Hu, L., Yu. Tao, X. Luan, X. Dou, E. Sutton, X. Yue, J. Lin, and et al. 2016. Contrasting behavior of the F2 peak and the topside ionosphere in response to the 2 October 2013 geomagnetic storm. J. Geophys. Res. Space Physics, 121 (2016), 10,549--10,563.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Zhong, W. Lei, A. Wang, G. Burns, X. Yue, and X. Dou. 2017. Longitudinal variations of topside ionospheric and plasmaspheric TEC. J. Geophys. Res. Space Physics. 122 (2017).Google Scholar
- D. Bilitza, D. Altadill, Y. Zhang, C. Mertens, V. Truhlik, P. Richards, L.-A. McKinnell, and B. Reinisch. 2014. The International Reference Ionosphere 2012 -- a model of international collaboration. J. Space Weather Space Clim., 4, A07 (2014), 12pages.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Krankowski, I.I. Shagimuratov, I.I. Ephishov, A. Krypiak-Gregorczyk, and G. Yakimova. 2009. The occurrence of the mid-latitude ionospheric trough in GPS-TEC measurements. Adv. Space Res., 43 (2009), 1721--1731.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A.T. Karpachev, M.V. Klimenko, V.V. Klimenko, and L.V. Pustovalova. 2016. Empirical model of the main ionospheric trough for the nighttime winter conditions. J. Atm. Solar-Terr. Phys. 146 (2016), 149--159.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A.T. Karpachev, G.F. Deminova, and V.V. Afonin. 2005. Global Response of the Upper Ionosphere to the Magnetospheric Storm of March 22-23, 1979, Geomagnetism and Aeronomy, 45(6), (2005), 730--744.Google Scholar
- C. Xiong, H. Lühr, and S.Y. Ma. 2013. The subauroral electron density trough: Comparison between satellite observations and IRI-2007 model estimates. Adv. Space Res., 51 (2013), 536--544.Google ScholarCross Ref
- X. Yue, W.S. Schreiner, N. Pedatella, R.A. Anthes, A.J. Mannucci, P.R. Straus, and J.-Y. Liu. 2014. Space Weather Observations by GNSS Radio Occultation: From FORMOSAT-3/COSMIC to FORMOSAT-7/COSMIC-2. Space Weather, 12 (2014), 616--621.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M.V. Klimenko, V.V Klimenko, I.E. Zakharenkova, and Iu.V. Cherniak. (2015). The global morphology of the plasmaspheric electron content during Northern winter 2009 based on GPS/COSMIC observation and GSM TIP model results. Adv. Space Res. 55 (2015), 2077--2085.Google ScholarCross Ref
- W. Schreiner, C. Rocken, S. Sokolovskiy, and et al. 2007. Estimates of the precision of GPS radio occultations from the COSMIC/FORMOSAT-3 mission. Geophys. Res. Lett., 34 (2007) L04808.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M.G. Deminov, and A.T. Karpachev. 1988. Longitudinal effect in main ionospheric trough according to data of "Intercosmos-19" satellite, Geomagn. Aeron. 28(1), (1988), 76--80, in Russian.Google Scholar
- N.P. Benkova, M.G. Deminov, A.T. Karpachev, N.A. Kochenova, Yu.V. Kusnerevsky, V.V. Migulin, S.A. Pulinets, and M.D. Fligel. 1990. Longitude features shown by topside sounder data and their importance in ionospheric mapping. Adv. Space Res., 10(8). (1990), 57--66.Google Scholar
- G.W. Sharp. 1966. Midlatitide Trough in the Night Ionosphere. J. Geophys. Res., 71(5), (1966), 1345.Google Scholar
- J. Lin, Y. Wu, X. Qiao, and Y. Zhou. 2012. An alternative Shell inversion technique -- Analysis and validation based on COSMIC and ionosonde data, Adv. Space Res., 49 (2012), 89--95.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Krankowski, I. Zakharenkova, A. Krypiak-Gregorczyk, I.I. Shagimuratov, and P. Wielgosz,. 2011. Ionospheric electron density observed by FORMOSAT-3/COSMIC over the European region and validated by ionosonde data. J Geod., 85 (2011), 949--964.Google ScholarCross Ref
- O.A. Maltseva, and N.S. Mozhaeva. 2016. Efficiency of the equivalent slab thickness of the ionosphere to set radio wave propagation conditions. In Proceedings of Fifth International Conference on Telecommunications and Remote Sensing Milan, Italy; 10-11 October 2016, 5--14. ISBN: 978-989-758-200-4.Google Scholar
- B. Nava, P. Coïsson, and S.M. Radicella. 2008. A new version of the NeQuick ionosphere electron density model. J. Atm. Solar-Terr. Phys., 70 (2008), 1856--1862.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A.T. Karpachev, N.A. Gasilov. 2006. Causes of longitude-latitudinal variations in the ionospheric F2-layer maximum in summer nighttime conditions. Intern. J. Geomagetism and Aeronomy, 6 (2006), GI2006.Google Scholar
- Verification of Ionospheric Models by TEC and Satellite Measurements
Recommendations
Use of TEC to determine foF2: differences and similarities at high and low latitudes
ICTRS '18: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Telecommunications and Remote SensingThe total electron content TEC finds wide application in various scientific and technological areas. One of applications is the use of TEC to obtain critical frequencies foF2 of the ionosphere. The most studied is the situation in middle latitudes. High ...
Ionospheric TEC estimation with the signals of various geostationary navigational satellites
With the development of receiver equipment and GNSS and SBAS constellations, the coherent dual-frequency L-band transmissions are now available from a number of geostationary satellites. These signals can be used for ionospheric total electron content (...
Single-frequency precise point positioning (PPP) for retrieving ionospheric TEC from BDS B1 data
The customary approach to determine ionospheric total electron content (TEC) with BeiDou navigations satellite system (BDS) data normally requires dual-frequency (DF) data provided by geodetic-grade receivers. In this study, we present an analysis of ...
Comments