skip to main content
10.1145/3152832.3152854acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmumConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Understanding collocated social interaction between Pokémon GO players

Authors Info & Claims
Published:26 November 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Pokémon GO, a location-based mobile game with millions of users, offers an opportunity to study how mobile technology can encourage collocated social interaction between people. Despite being predominantly a single-player game, Pokémon GO has been discussed to induce a variety of social interactions between the players. We conducted a qualitative online survey to gain insight on collocated interactions and encounters that take place around the game, and to understand how they relate to the game design. Our analysis shows that the game design promotes encounters between players, the idle time during the game allows various forms of social interaction to take place, and further, the players gain various benefits from exchanging information with each other. Based on the findings, we present design implications for the design of mobile applications or games aiming to encourage collocated social interaction.

References

  1. Tim Althoff, Ryen White, and Eric Horvitz. 2016. Influence of Pokémon Go on Physical Activity: Study and Implications. Retrieved January 2, 2017 from https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.02085Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Marios Angelides and Harry Agius. 2014. Handbook of digital games. John Wiely & Sons. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Mara Balestrini, Raymundo Cornejo, Paul Marshall, Monica E Tentori, Jon Bird, and Yvonne Rogers. 2016. Jokebox: Coordinating Shared Encounters in Public Spaces. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing - CSCW '16, 38--49. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Arianna Bassoli, Julian Moore, and Stefan Agamanolis. 2006. TUNA: SOCIALISING MUSIC SHARING ON THE MOVE. 151--172.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Marek Bell, Matthew Chalmers, Louise Barkhuus, Malcolm Hall, Scott Sherwood, Paul Tennent, Barry Brown, Duncan Rowland, and Steve Benford. 2006. Interweaving mobile games with everyday life. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems - CHI '06, 417. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Steve Benford, Andy Crabtree, Martin Flintham, Adam Drozd, Rob Anastasi, Mark Paxton, Nick Tandavanitj, Matt Adams, and Ju Row-Farr. 2006. Can you see me now? ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 13, 1: 100--133. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Steve Benford, Claire O'Malley, Kristian T. Simsarian, Danaë Stanton, Yngve Sundblad, Gustav Taxén, Benjamin B. Bederson, Karl-Petter Åkesson, Victor Bayon, Allison Druin, Pär Hansson, Juan Pablo Hourcade, Rob Ingram, and Helen Neale. 2000. Designing storytelling technologies to encouraging collaboration between young children. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '00, 556--563. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Steve Benford, Duncan Rowland, Martin Flintham, Adam Drozd, Richard Hull, Josephine Reid, Jo Morrison, and Keri Facer. 2005. Life on the edge: supporting collaboration in location-based experiences. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '05, 721. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Martin Bjerver. 2006. Player Behaviour in Pervasive Games-Using the City as Game Board in Botfighters. Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Staffan Björk, Jennica Falk, Rebecca Hansson, and Peter Ljungstrand. 2001. Pirates!-using the physical world as a game board. In INTERACT'01, 423--430.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Jay Chen and Azza Abouzied. 2016. One LED is Enough: Catalyzing Face-to-face Interactions at Conferences with a Gentle Nudge. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing - CSCW '16, 172--182. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Trina Choontanom and Bonnie Nardi. 2012. Theorycrafting: The Art and Science of Using Numbers to Interpret the World. In Games, learning, and society: Learning and meaning in the digital age. 185.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Ashley Colley, Jacob Thebault-Spieker, Allen Y. Lin, Donald Degraen, Benjamin Fischman, Jonna Häkkilä, Kate Kuehl, Valentina Nisi, Nuno J. Nunes, Nina Wenig, Dirk Wenig, Brent Hecht, and Johannes Schöning. 2017. The Geography of Pokémon GO: Beneficial and Problematic Effects on Places and Movement. In Proceedings of the 35th international conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '17, In press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Mia Consalvo. 2009. Cheating: Gaining advantage in videogames. MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Mia Consalvo. 2009. Hardcore casual: game culture Return(s) to Ravenhearst. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Foundations of Digital Games - FDG '09, 50. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Leon Festinger. A theory of social comparison processes. Human relations 7, 2: 117--140.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Erving Goffman. 1963. Behavior in Public Places Notes on the Social Organization of Gatherings. Simon&Schuster Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Maria Håkansson, Mattias Rost, Mattias Jacobsson, and Lars Erik Holmquist. 2007. Facilitating Mobile Music Sharing and Social Interaction with Push ! Music. 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Pradthana Jarusriboonchai, Aris Malapaschas, Thomas Olsson, and Kaisa Väänänen. 2016. Design and Evaluation of a Multi-Player Mobile Game for Icebreaking Activity. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 4366--4377. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2858298 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Pradthana Jarusriboonchai, Thomas Olsson, Sus Lundgren, and Kaisa Väänänen. 2016. Let's Take Photos Together: Exploring Asymmetrical Interaction Abilities on Mobile Camera Phones. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Pradthana Jarusriboonchai, Thomas Olsson, Vikas Prabhu, and Kaisa Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila. 2015. CueSense: A Wearable Proximity-Aware Display Enhancing Encounters. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHIEA '15, 2127--2132. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Viirj Kan, Katsuya Fujii, Judith Amores, Chang Long Zhu Jin, Pattie Maes, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2015. Social Textiles: Social Affordances and Icebreaking Interactions Through Wearable Social Messaging. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction - TEI '15, 619--624. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Pavel Karpashevich, Eva Hornecker, Nana Kesewaa Dankwa, Mohamed Hanafy, and Julian Fietkau. 2016. Blurring boundaries between everyday life and pervasive gaming. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia - MUM '16, 217--228. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Christian Licoppe and Yoriko Inada. 2012. "Timid Encounters": A Case Study in the Use of Proximity-Based Mobile Technologies. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM annual conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '12, 2759. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. David W. McDonald, Joseph F. McCarthy, Suzanne Soroczak, David H. Nguyen, and Al M. Rashid. 2008. Proactive displays: Supporting Awareness in Fluid Social Environment. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 14, 4: 1--31. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Markus Montola. 2005. Exploring the edge of the magic circle: Defining pervasive games. In DAC, 103.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Bonnie Nardi and Justin Harris. 2006. Strangers and friends: collaborative play in world of warcraft. In Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on Computer supported cooperative work - CSCW '06, 149--158. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Elena Nazzi and Tomas Sokoler. 2011. Walky for embodied microblogging: sharing mundane activities through augmented everyday objects. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, 563--568. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Carman Neustaedter, Anthony Tang, and Judge K. Tejinder. 2010. The role of community and groupware in geocache creation and maintenance. In Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '10, 1757. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Kenton O'Hara. 2008. Understanding geocaching practices and motivations. In Proceeding of the twenty-sixth annual CHI conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '08, 1177. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Janne Paavilainen, Hannu Korhonen, Kati Alha, Jaakko Stenros, Elina Koskinen, and Frans Mayra. 2017. The Pokémon GO Experience: A Location-Based Augmented Reality Mobile Game Goes Mainstream. In Proceedings of the 35th international conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '17, In press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Jan Seeburger, Marcus Foth, and Dian Tjondronegoro. 2012. The sound of music: sharing song selections between collocated strangers in public urban places. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia - MUM '12, 1. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Mike Sonders. Pokémon GO demographics: The evolving player mix of a smash-hit game. Retrieved July 6, 2017 from https ://medium.com/@sm_app_intel/pokémon-go-demographics-the-evolving-player-mix-of-a-smash-hit-game-b9099d5527b7Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Mike Sonders. Pokémon GO retention: No, it's not facing a player loyalty crisis. Retrieved April 20, 2017 from https://medium.com/@sm_app_intel/pokémon-go-retention-no-its-not-facing-a-player-loyalty-crisis-fe0d80fad429Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Olli Sotamaa. 2002. All The World's A Botfighter Stage: Notes on Location-based Multi-User Gaming. In Proceedings of Computer Games and Digital Cultures Conference, 35--44.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Jaakko Stenros, Janne Paavilainen, and Frans Mäyrä. 2009. The many faces of sociability and social play in games. In Proceedings of the 13th International MindTrek Conference: Everyday Life in the Ubiquitous Era on - MindTrek '09, 82. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Jaakko Stenros, Annika Waern, and Markus Montola. 2011. Studying the Elusive Experience in Pervasive Games. Simulating & Gaming. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Jaakko Stenros, Janne Paavilainen, and Frans Mayra. 2011. Social interaction in games. International Journal of arts and technology 4, 3: 342--358.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Jennifer Yoon, Jun Oishi, Jason Nawyn, Kazue Kobayashi, and Neeti Gupta. 2004. FishPong: Encouraging Human-to-Human Interaction in Informal Social Environments. 374--377. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. 5K people turn up to catch Pokémon in Chicago. Retrieved April 14, 2017 from https://techcrunch.com/2016/07/18/5k-people-turn-up-to-catch-pokemon-in-chicago/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. You have to see what "Pokémon Go" has done to Central Park. Retrieved April 14, 2017 from http://www.businessinsider.sg/dozens-of-people-gathering-in-central-park-to-play-pokemon-go-2016--7/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Pokemon Go's mental health benefits are real. Retrieved April 14, 2017 from https://www.engadget.com/2016/07/13/pokemon-go-mental-health-science/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Pokémon GO: Explore. Retrieved April 14, 2017 from http://www.pokemongo.com/en-us/explore/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Zombie Run. Retrieved April 14, 2017 from https://zombiesrungame.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Geocaching. Retrieved April 14, 2017 from https://www.geocaching.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Ingress - Wikipedia. Retrieved April 14, 2017 from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ingress_(video_game)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Ingress - Wikia. Retrieved April 14, 2017 from http://ingress.wikia.com/wiki/IngressGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Ingress Events. Retrieved April 14, 2017 from https://www.ingress.com/eventsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. The Silph Road. Retrieved April 14, 2017 from https://thesilphroad.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Positive-Sum Games. Retrieved September 18, 2016 from https://www.edge.org/response-detail/10135Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Casual Versus Core. Retrieved April 14, 2017 from http://www.gamasutra.com/view/feature/131529/casual_versus_core.phpGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  1. Understanding collocated social interaction between Pokémon GO players

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      MUM '17: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia
      November 2017
      567 pages
      ISBN:9781450353786
      DOI:10.1145/3152832

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 November 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate190of465submissions,41%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader