skip to main content
10.1145/3154862.3154879acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespervasivehealthConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Data representations for in-situ exploration of health and fitness data

Published:23 May 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Wearable devices that collect and generate masses of health related data, such as number of steps taken in a day and heart-rate have seen widespread adoption among general consumers. The wearers of such devices need to interpret the data being generated to ensure they meet their physical activity goals. Little is currently known about how users of such devices explore such data and the corresponding visual representations, in-situ, i.e. during the course of their physical activity. Through a series of interview sessions with users of health and fitness data, i.e., quantified-selfers, we gained an understanding of how they benefit from in-situ data exploration. Our findings reveal the wide number of in-situ tasks, data types, and requirements for designing data representations that support immediate reflection on data being collected. We further solicited the aid of professional designers to sketch visual representations for carrying out the necessary in-situ tasks identified by our users. From these exploratory studies, we derive broader implications for the design of data representations supporting in-situ exploration.

References

  1. Fereshteh Amini, Nathalie H. Riche, Bongshin Lee, Andrés Monroy-Hernández, and Pourang Irani. 2016. Authoring Data-Driven Videos with DataClips. In Proceedings of InfoVis '16, 501--510. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. James "Bo" Begole, John C. Tang, and Rosco Hill. 2003. Rhythm modeling, visualizations and applications. In Proceedings of UIST '03, 11--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Frank Bentley, Konrad Tollmar, Peter Stephenson, Laura Levy, Brian Jones, Scott Robertson, Ed Price, Richard Catrambone, and Jeff Wilson. 2013. Health mashups: presenting statistical patterns between wellbeing data and context in natural language to promote behavior change. TOCHI; 20(5): 30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Eun Kyoung Choe, Nicole B. Lee, Bongshin Lee, Wanda Pratt, and Julie A. Kientz. 2014. Understanding quantified-selfers' practices in collecting and exploring personal data. In Proceedings of CHI '14, 1143--1152. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Chia-Fang Chung, Kristin Dew, Allison Cole, Jasmine Zia, James Fogarty, Julie A. Kientz, and Sean A. Munson. 2016. Boundary negotiating artifacts in personal informatics: patient-provider collaboration with patient-generated data. In Proceedings of CSCW '16, 770--786. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Sunny Consolvo, David W. McDonald, Tammy Toscos, Mike Y. Chen, Jon Froehlich, Beverly Harrison, Predrag Klasnja, Anthony LaMarca, Louis LeGrand, Ryan Libby, Ian Smith, and James A. Landay. 2008. Activity sensing in the wild: a field trial of UbiFit garden. In Proceedings of CHI '08, 1797--1806. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Chris Elsden, David S. Kirk and Abigail C. Durrant. 2015. A quantified past: toward design for remembering with personal informatics, Human-Computer Interaction, 1--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Daniel Epstein, Felicia Cordeiro, Elizabeth Bales, James Fogarty, and Sean Munson. 2014. Taming data complexity in lifelogs: exploring visual cuts of personal informatics data. In Proceedings of DIS '14, 667--676. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Nicholas Felton. 2017. Retrieved January 11, 2017, from http://feltron.com/info.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Jim Gemmell, Aleks Aris and Roger Lueder. Telling Stories with Mylifebits. 2005. In Proceedings of ICME '05, 1536--1539.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Steve Haroz, Robert Kosara, and Steven L. Franconeri. 2015. ISOTYPE Visualization: Working Memory, Performance, and Engagement with Pictographs. In Proceedings of CHI '15, 1191--1200. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Andrew Hilts, Christopher Parsons, and Jeffrey Knockel. 2016. Every step you fake-a comparative analysis of fitness tracker privacy and security. Open Effect Report.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Vera Khovanskaya, Eric P.S. Baumer, Dan Cosley, Stephen Voida, and Geri Gay. 2013. "Everybody knows what you're doing": a critical design approach to personal informatics. In Proceedings of CHI '13, 3403--3412. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Ian Li, Anind Dey, and Jodi Forlizzi. 2010. A stage-based model of personal informatics systems. In Proceedings of CHI '10, 557--566. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. James J. Lin, Lena Mamykina, Silvia Lindtner, Gregory Delajoux, and Henry B. Strub. 2006. Fish'n'Steps: encouraging physical activity with an interactive computer game. In Proceedings of UbiComp'06, 261--278. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Janne Lindqvist, Justin Cranshaw, Jason Wiese, Jason Hong, and John Zimmerman. 2011. I'm the mayor of my house: examining why people use foursquare - a social-driven location sharing application. In Proceedings of CHI '11, 2409--2418. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Tara Matthews, Devin Blais, Aubrey Shick, Jennifer Mankoff, Jodi Forlizzi, Stacie Rohrbach, Roberta Klatzky. 2006. Evaluating glanceable visuals for multitasking. Technical Report EECS-2006--173. UC Berkeley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Tara Matthews, Jodi Forlizzi, and Stacie Rohrbach. 2005. Designing glanceable peripheral displays. Technical Report No. UCB/EECS-2006--113. UC Berkeley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Sean A. Munson, Hasan Cavusoglu, Larry Frisch, and Sidney Fels. 2013. Sociotechnical challenges and progress in using social media for health. Journal of medical Internet Research, 15(10): e226.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Tiffany Ng, Ou Jie Zhao, and Dan Cosley. 2011. pieTime: visualizing communication patterns. In Proceedings of PASSAT/SocialCom '11, 720--723.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. John Rooksby, Mattias Rost, Alistair Morrison, and Matthew Chalmers Chalmers. 2014. Personal tracking as lived informatics. In Proceedings of CHI '14, 1163--1172. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Drew Skau, Robert Kosara. 2016. Arcs, Angles, or Areas: Individual Data Encodings in Pie and Donut Charts. Computer Graphics Forum, 35: 121--130. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Tracking for Health. 2013. Retrieved January 11, 2017, from http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/01/28/tracking-for-health/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Visual Literacy: An E-Learning Tutorial on Visualization for Communication, Engineering and Business Retrieved January 11, 2017, from http://www.visual-literacy.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Katerina Vrotsou, Kajsa Ellegard, Matthew Cooper. 2007. Everyday life discoveries: mining and visualizing activity patterns in social science diary data, In Proceedings of IV '07, 130--138. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Mark Whooley, Bernd Ploderer, and Kathleen Gray. 2014. On the integration of self-tracking data amongst quantified self members. In Proceedings of BCS-HCI '14, 151--160. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    PervasiveHealth '17: Proceedings of the 11th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare
    May 2017
    503 pages
    ISBN:9781450363631
    DOI:10.1145/3154862

    Copyright © 2017 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 23 May 2017

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate55of116submissions,47%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader