skip to main content
10.1145/3154979.3154980acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiccctConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Flip Error Elimination and Core Map Selection in Patch and Stitch Algorithms for Localization in Wireless Sensor Network

Authors Info & Claims
Published:24 November 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Patch and stitch is a well emerging technique for localization in wireless sensor networks. However, due to the presence of measurement error ordinary patch stitch may suffer from flip error. Particularly, during incremental stitching, flip error propagates from one phase to another causing avalanche error propagation. In this paper, we propose an improved patch stitch algorithm which uses a beacon degree based core map selection and minimizes the possibility of flip occurrence by using a robust triangle based stitching. Simulation results show that the improved patch stitch achieves higher accuracy as compared to the ordinary patch stitch algorithm.

References

  1. G Mao and B Fidan. Sensor network localization. In N P Mahalik, editor, Sensor Networks and Configuration: Fundamentals, Techniques, Platforms and Applications, pages 281--315. Springer-Verlag, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Andreas Savvides, Chih-Chieh Han, and Mani B Strivastava. Dynamic fine-grained localization in ad-hoc networks of sensors. In Proceedings of the 7th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, pages 166--179. ACM, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Yi Shang, Wheeler Ruml, Ying Zhang, and Markus PJ Fromherz. Localization from mere connectivity. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad hoc Networking & Computing, pages 201--212. ACM, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Trevor F Cox and Michael AA Cox. Multidimensional Scaling. CRC press, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Dragoş Niculescu and Badri Nath. Dv based positioning in ad hoc networks. Telecommunication Systems, 22(1):267--280, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Berthold KP Horn. Closed-form solution of absolute orientation using unit quaternions. JOSA A, 4(4):629--642, 1987. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Chengqun Wang, Jiming Chen, Youxian Sun, and Xuemin Shen. Wireless sensor networks localization with isomap. In IEEE International Conference on Communications, pages 1--5. IEEE, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Yi Shang and Wheeler Ruml. Improved mds-based localization. In INFOCOM 2004. Twenty-third Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies, volume 4, pages 2640--2651. IEEE, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Lambert Meertens and Stephen Fitzpatrick. The distributed construction of a global coordinate system in a network of static computational nodes from inter-node distances. Kestrel Institute TR KES. U, 4, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. David Moore, John Leonard, Daniela Rus, and Seth Teller. Robust distributed network localization with noisy range measurements. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems, pages 50--61. ACM, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Oh-Heum Kwon, Ha-Joo Song, and Sangjoon Park. Anchor-free localization through flip-error-resistant map stitching in wireless sensor network. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 21(11):1644--1657, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Xiaoping Wang, Yunhao Liu, Zheng Yang, Kai Lu, and Jun Luo. Robust component-based localizationin sparse networks. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 25(5):1317--1327, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Rajat Sanyal and Kunal N Chaudhury. Scalable and accurate sensor network localization using cliques. In Signal Processing and Communications (SPCOM), 2016 International Conference on, pages 1--5. IEEE, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Rajat Sanyal, Monika Jaiswal, and Kunal Narayan Chaudhury. On a registration-based approach to sensor network localization. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 65(20):5357--5367, 2017. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Joshua B Tenenbaum, Vin De Silva, and John C Langford. A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction. science, 290(5500):2319--2323, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Jyoti Kashniyal, Shekhar Verma, and Krishna Pratap Singh. Wireless sensor networks localization using progressive isomap. Wireless Personal Communications, 92(3):1281--1302, 2017. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Anushiya A Kannan, Baris Fidan, and Guoqiang Mao. Robust distributed sensor network localization based on analysis of flip ambiguities. In Global Telecommunications Conference, 2008. IEEE GLOBECOM 2008. IEEE, pages 1--6. IEEE, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Flip Error Elimination and Core Map Selection in Patch and Stitch Algorithms for Localization in Wireless Sensor Network

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            ICCCT-2017: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computer and Communication Technology
            November 2017
            157 pages
            ISBN:9781450353243
            DOI:10.1145/3154979

            Copyright © 2017 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 24 November 2017

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

            Acceptance Rates

            ICCCT-2017 Paper Acceptance Rate33of124submissions,27%Overall Acceptance Rate33of124submissions,27%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader