skip to main content
10.1145/3154979.3154981acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiccctConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Comparative Study for Proposed Algorithm for All-Optical Network with Negative Acknowledgement (AO-NACK)

Authors Info & Claims
Published:24 November 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper focuses on an efficient packet delivery mechanism for all-optical network. As optical networks use Wavelength Division Multiplexing (WDM) thus information can be transmitted in parallel. This paper focuses on achieving 100 percent throughput via using buffer and negative acknowledgement mechanisms. The proposed mechanism also reduces un-necessary traffic in the network while keeping the re-transmission of packets in check using optical buffer. For a typical four inputs and outputs switch without buffer some thousands of packets are dropped which can be bring down to some tens of packet with only a buffer size of 8 packets. Thus the re-transmitted packets also get reduced significantly.

References

  1. R.K. Singh, R. Srivastava and Y.N. Singh. 2007 Wavelength division multiplexed loop buffer memory based optical packet switch. Optical and Quantum Electronics. 39,1(Jan 2007), 15--34. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. K.Xi, Y.H. Kao, M.Yang, and H.J. Chao. 2010 Petabit optical switch for data center networks. Technical Report, Polytechnic Institute of New York University, Brooklyn. NY, 135--154.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. X. Ye, V. Akella, and S.J.B. Yoo 2011. Comparative studies of all-optical vs. electrical vs. hybrid switches in data com and in telecom networks. Proceedings of Optical Fiber Communication Conference and Exposition, and the National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference (OFC/NFOEC). pp. 1--3Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Y. Yin, R Proietti, X.Ye, C.J. Nitta, V. Akella, and S.J.B. Yoo. 2013 LIONS: An AWGR-Based Low-Latency Optical Switch for High-Performance Computing and Data Centers. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics In Quantum Electronics, 19, 2(March/April 2013), 272--280.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. S. Pallavi, and M. Lakshmi 2013 AWG Based Optical Packet Switch Architecture. International Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science 5,4, (March 2013), 30--39.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. S. Pallavi, and M. Lakshmi 2014 An AWG based optical router. Proceedings of International Conference on Signal Processing and Integrated Networks (SPIN), 47 (Feb 2014), 245--248.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. V. Shukla, and R. Srivastava 2015 WDM fiber delay lines and AWG based optical packet switch architecture. Proceedings of National Conference on Innovative Trends in Computer Science Engineering (ITCSE-2015). (April 2015), 47--49.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. V. Shukla, A. Jain, and R. Srivastava 2016 Performance evaluation of an AWG based optical router. Optical and Quantum Electronics. 48,1 (Jan 2016), 1--16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. H. Rastegarfar, A. Leon-Garcia, S. LaRochelle, and L.A. Rusch 2013 Cross-layer performance analysis of recirculation buffers for optical data centers. IEEE Journal of Light wave Technology. 31,3, 432--445. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. R. Srivastava, R.K. Singh, and Y.N. Singh 2009 Design Analysis of Optical Loop Memory. Journal of Lightwave Technology. 27,11, 4821--4831. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. V. Shukla, A. Jain, and R. Srivastava 2016 Design of an arrayed waveguide gratings based optical packet switch. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology. 11, 12, 1705--1721.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. R. Srivastava, and Y. N. Singh 2010 Feedback fiber delay lines and AWG based optical packet switch architecture. Journal of Optical Switching and Networking. 7,2,75--84. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. R. Proietti, Y. Yin, R. Yu, X. Ye, C. Nitta, V. Akella, and S.J.B. Yoo. 2012, All-Optical Physical Layer NACK in AWGR-Based Optical Interconnects. IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, 24, 5, (March 2012) 410--142.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. R. Ramaswami, and K. N. Sivarajan. 1995. Routing and Wavelength Assignment In All-Optical Networks. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 3,5 (Oct. 1995), 489--500. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. M. Flammini, and C. Scheideler. 1997. Simple, Efficient Routing Schemes For All-Optical Networks. In SPAA '97 Proceedings of the ninth annual ACM symposium on Parallel algorithms and architectures, Newport, Rhode Island, USA, 170--179.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. P. Raghavan, and E. Upfal. 1994. Efficient Routing in All-Optical Networks. In STOC '94 Proceedings of the twenty-sixth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, Montreal, Canada, 134--143. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. W. Hioki. 1995. Telecommunications. Prentice Hall, India.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Comparative Study for Proposed Algorithm for All-Optical Network with Negative Acknowledgement (AO-NACK)

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          ICCCT-2017: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computer and Communication Technology
          November 2017
          157 pages
          ISBN:9781450353243
          DOI:10.1145/3154979

          Copyright © 2017 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 24 November 2017

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Author Tags

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          ICCCT-2017 Paper Acceptance Rate33of124submissions,27%Overall Acceptance Rate33of124submissions,27%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader