skip to main content
10.1145/3154979.3154982acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiccctConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Designing an efficient methodology based on Entropy-TOPSIS for evaluating efficiency of cloud services

Authors Info & Claims
Published:24 November 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

With the vast emergence of cloud computing in the recent year, numerous cloud service provider has started to provide similar functionality to the cloud customer. From a customer point of view, it has become very challenging task to select the suitable cloud services. The Quality of Service (QoS) is considered as the most significant factor for appropriate service selection and user satisfaction in cloud computing. Due to the multidimensional attribute of QoS and an interconnected relationship between them, the cloud service selection problem treated as a complex decision problem for a cloud customer. This study introduces a methodology for determining the appropriate cloud service by integrating the entropy weight method with TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) method. By using entropy method, we calculate the objective weight of evaluation criteria and reduce the subjective factor in the cloud service selection problem. Thereafter, TOPSIS method is utilized to evaluate the final rank of cloud service alternative based on overall performance. A real time cloud case study proves and validate the potential of our proposed approach.

References

  1. S. K. Garg, S. Versteeg, and R. Buyya, "A framework for ranking of cloud computing services," Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 1012--1023, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. M. Lecznar and S. Patig, "Cloud computing providers: Characteristics and recommendations," in International Conference on E-Technologies. Springer, 2011, pp. 32--45. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. J. McKendrick, "Ten companies where soa made a difference in 2006," Retrieved March, vol. 15, p. 2010, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. M. Zeleny and J. L. Cochrane, Multiple criteria decision making. University of South Carolina Press, 1973.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. S. Le, H. Dong, F. K. Hussain, O. K. Hussain, J. Ma, and Y. Zhang, "Multicriteria decision making with fuzziness and criteria interdependence in cloud service selection," in Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE), 2014 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 2014, pp. 1929--1936. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. R. R. Kumar, S. Mishra, and C. Kumar, "Prioritizing the solution of cloud service selection using integrated mcdm methods under fuzzy environment," The Journal of Supercomputing, pp. 1--31, 2017. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Z. Xiao-guang, "Research on method of vague matter-element decision making based on entropy weight [j]," Journal of Systems & Management, vol. 4, p. 016, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. J.-J. Huang and K. Yoon, Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. M. Godse and S. Mulik, "An approach for selecting software-as-a-service (saas) product," in Cloud Computing, 2009. CLOUD'09. IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 2009, pp. 155--158. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. M. Alhamad, T. Dillon, and E. Chang, "A trust-evaluation metric for cloud applications," International Journal of Machine Learning and Computing, vol. 1, no. 4, p. 416, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. A. V. Dastjerdi and R. Buyya, "A taxonomy of qos management and service selection methodologies for cloud computing," Cloud Computing: Methodology, Systems, and Applications, pp. 109--131, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. N. Somu, K. Kirthivasan, and S. S. VS, "A computational model for ranking cloud service providers using hypergraph based techniques," Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 68, pp. 14--30, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. L. Sun, J. Ma, Y. Zhang, H. Dong, and F. K. Hussain, "Cloudfuser: Fuzzy ontology and mcdm based cloud service selection," Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 57, pp. 42--55, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. J. Siegel and J. Perdue, "Cloud services measures for global use: the service measurement index (smi)," in SRII Global Conference (SRII), 2012 Annual. IEEE, 2012, pp. 411--415. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. A. Jahani and L. M. Khanli, "Cloud service ranking as a multi objective optimization problem," The Journal of Supercomputing, vol. 72, no. 5, pp. 1897--1926, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. C. E. Shannon and W. Weaver, "The mathematical theory of communication," 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. C.-L. Hwang and K. Yoon, Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications a state-of-the-art survey. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012, vol. 186.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Cloud Harmony Reports. http://static.lindsberget.se/state-of-the-cloud-compute-0714.pdf. [Online; Accessed 12-March-2017].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Designing an efficient methodology based on Entropy-TOPSIS for evaluating efficiency of cloud services

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICCCT-2017: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computer and Communication Technology
      November 2017
      157 pages
      ISBN:9781450353243
      DOI:10.1145/3154979

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      © 2017 Association for Computing Machinery. ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor or affiliate of a national government. As such, the Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government purposes only.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 24 November 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      ICCCT-2017 Paper Acceptance Rate33of124submissions,27%Overall Acceptance Rate33of124submissions,27%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader