skip to main content
10.1145/3154979.3154986acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiccctConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Discourse Linking Tool for English Language Texts comprising Lexicon building and Ontology Creation

Published: 24 November 2017 Publication History

Abstract

Natural Language text is not bound by a fixed structure. For a machine to understand the language, the challenge lies in resolving the ambiguities and capturing innovativeness. Due to its unstructured nature, discourse linking, required for understanding and generating text by a machine is a challenging task. Also, dealing with sentences varied in nature and changing them into generic structure is an additional challenge. This paper presents a way to create a discourse linking tool for English language. This tool is based on specially created lexicon and hand-crafted rules suited for discourse linking purpose. Currently available lexicons such as dictionaries, WordNet, etc. are not suited as they lack domain knowledge. Therefore, an ontology is developed for political news domain which serves as a lexicon and its inherent relations are used for discourse linking purpose.

References

[1]
Rashmi Prasad, Bonnie Webber, Alan Lee, Sameer Pradhan and Aravind Joshi, Bridging Sentential and Discourse-level Semantics through Clausal Adjuncts, Proceedings of the EMNLP 2015 Workshop on Linking Models of Lexical, Sentential and Discourse-level Semantics, pages 64--69. Lisboa, Portugal, 2015.
[2]
Heeyoung Lee, Yves Peirsman, Angel Chang, Nathanael Chambers, Mihai Surdeanu and Dan Jurafsky, Stanford's Multi-Pass Sieve Coreference Resolution System at the CoNLL-2011 Shared Task, Proceedings of the Fifteenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning. Stanford NLP Group Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, 2011.
[3]
Kevin Clark and Christopher Manning, Deep Reinforcement Learning for Mention-Ranking Coreference Models, EMNLP 2016 Computer Science Department, Stanford University, 2016.
[4]
Mark Sammons, Christos Christodoulopoulos, Parisa Kordjamshidi, Daniel Khashabi, Vivek Srikumar, Paul Vijayakumar, Mazin Bokhari, Xinbo Wu and Dan Roth, Feature Extraction for NLP, Simplified. Department of Computer Science, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
[5]
Leon Derczynski, Diana Maynard, Giuseppe Rizzo, Marieke van Erp, Genevieve Gorrell, Raphael Troncy, Johann Petrak and Kalina Bontcheva, Analysis of named entity recognition and linking for tweets. Information Processing & Management Volume 51, Issue 2, 2015.
[6]
Samet Atdag and Vincent Labatut, A Comparison of Named Entity Recognition Tools Applied to Biographical Texts. Harlow, England: Addison-Wesley, 1999.

Index Terms

  1. A Discourse Linking Tool for English Language Texts comprising Lexicon building and Ontology Creation

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICCCT-2017: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computer and Communication Technology
      November 2017
      157 pages
      ISBN:9781450353243
      DOI:10.1145/3154979
      © 2017 Association for Computing Machinery. ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor or affiliate of a national government. As such, the Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government purposes only.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 24 November 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Discourse linking
      2. anaphora resolution
      3. chunking
      4. co-reference resolution
      5. lexicon building
      6. ontology

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Conference

      ICCCT-2017

      Acceptance Rates

      ICCCT-2017 Paper Acceptance Rate 33 of 124 submissions, 27%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 33 of 124 submissions, 27%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • 0
        Total Citations
      • 50
        Total Downloads
      • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
      Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media