skip to main content
10.1145/3157754.3157761acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicemeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Impact of GDP, Capital and Employment on Waste Generation-The Case of France, Germany and UK Regions

Published:27 October 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

An increasing attention is paid to the role of economic growth as well as waste generation due to the harmful environmental and health effects of hazardous waste. It is predominantly argued that economic growth promotes waste and hence worsens already precarious environmental problems. Another experts and scholars contend that the direct link between economic growth and waste emission into economic system-environmental degradation is too simplistic and the causality is indirect, affected by policy and socio-economic context. However, previous related research was limited to the national level, mainly due to the lack of available data. Comparative studies across nations are missing. Therefore, this study aims to overcome this limitation by using regional level data from France, Germany and UK for the years 2000-2013. Using panel cointegration tests, we find that cointegration is present between total waste per capita, GDP per capita, employment rate and gross fixed capital per capita formation. We further investigate both short and long run Granger causal relationships between waste generation and GDP, employment rate likewise gross fixed capital formation. In the short run, there is bidirectional causal relation running from GDP to waste in Germany, whereas bidirectional causality running from GDP and gross capital formation to waste was observed for the UK. For France, causality running only from gross capital formation to waste was found. In the long run, the variables had no impact on waste in France and Germany. Meanwhile, the result provides both unidirectional and bidirectional granger causality running from gross capital formation, GDP and employment to waste in the UK. These differences lead to important policy implications for each of these countries.

References

  1. Karak, T., Bhagat, R. M. and Bhattacharyya, P. 2012. Municipal solid waste generation, composition, and management: The world scenario. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology. 42, 15, 1509--1630.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Hoornweg, D. and Bhada-Tata, P. 2012. What a Waste: A Global Review of Solid Waste Management. Washington, D. C.: The World Bank.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Biointelligence Service 2012. EU Guidance to Waste Prevention Document Paris. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Regional Environmental Centre.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Chatham-Stephens, K., Caravanos, J., Ericson, B., Landrigan, P. and Fuller, R. 2014. The pediatric burden of disease from lead exposure at toxic waste sites in low and middle income countries. Environmental Research. 132, 379--383.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Martuzzi, M., Mitis, F., Bianchi, F., Minichilli, F., Comba, P. and Fazzo, L. 2009. Cancer mortality and congenital anomalies in a region of Italy with intense environmental pressure due to waste. Occupational and Environmental Medicine.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Gensburg, L. J., Pantea, C., Fitzgerald, E., Stark, A., Hwang, S. A. and Kim, N. 2009. Mortality among former love canal residents. Environmental Health Perspectives. 117, 2, 209--216.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Garcia-Perez, J., Fernandez-Navarro, P., Castello, A., Lopez-Cima, M. F., et al. 2013. Cancer mortality in towns in the vicinity of incinerators and installations for the recovery or disposal of hazardous waste. Environment International. 51, 31--44.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Wilts, C. H., Arnold, M. and Bogdanovic, J. 2017. Prevention of Hazardous Waste in Europe: The Status in 2015. Copenhagen: European Environmental Agency.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Saeed, M. O., Hassan, M. N. and Mujeebu, M. A. 2009. Assessment of municipal solid waste generation and recyclable materials potential in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Waste Management. 29, 7, 2209--2213.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Liu, C. and Wu, X. W. 2011. Factors influencing municipal solid waste generation in China: A multiple statistical analysis study. Waste Management & Research. 29, 4, 371--378.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Impact of GDP, Capital and Employment on Waste Generation-The Case of France, Germany and UK Regions

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICEME '17: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on E-business, Management and Economics
      October 2017
      136 pages
      ISBN:9781450353670
      DOI:10.1145/3157754

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 October 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader