ABSTRACT
Making technology and computer science learning experiences accessible to students with disabilities is an important step in preparing them to enter the workforce of the future--one in which many jobs will require skills to solve problems with technology. This paper presents the tool and curricular enhancements developed to make the Exploring Computer Science Robotics unit accessible to students with visual impairments (VI). It describes the evolution of enhancements, based on formative evaluation studies, to increase support as VI students engaged in building and programming LEGO Mindstorms robots. Results describe the ways in which enhancements were iteratively designed in response to student engagement and confidence, as well as their emerging understanding of top-down and bottom-up processes in robotics design and programming.
- Barab, S. (2014) Design-Based Research: A methodological toolkit for engineering change, in The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, edited by Sawyer, R.K., 151--170. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Burgstahler, S., & Ladner, R.E. (2007). Increasing the participation of people with disabilities in computing fields. Computer. 40(5), 94--97. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Burgstahler, S. & Chang, C. (2009). Promising interventions for promoting STEM fields to students who have disabilities. Review of Disability Studies: An International Journal, 5, 29--47.Google Scholar
- Cross, N. (1982). Designerly ways of knowing. Design Studies, 3(4), 221--227.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Fagin, B. S., Merkle, L. D., & Eggers, T. W. (2001, September). Teaching computer science with robotics using Ada/Mindstorms 2.0. In ACM SIGAda Ada Letters (Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 73--78). ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gomez, K., Bernstein, D., Zywica, J., & Hamner, E. (2012). Building technical knowledge and engagement in robotics: An examination of two out-of-school programs. In B.Barker, G. Nugent, N. Grandgenett, and V.I. Adamchuk (Eds.), Robotics in K-12 Education: A New Technology for Learning (pp. 222--244).Google ScholarCross Ref
- Grabowski, L. M., & Brazier, P. (2011, October). Robots, recruitment, and retention: Broadening participation through CS0. In 2011 Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. F4H-1). IEEE. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Grover, S. & Pea, R. (2013). Computational thinking in K-12: A review of the state of the field. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 38--43.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hutchinson, M.A., Follman, D.K., Sumpter, M., & Bodner, G.M. (2006). Factors influencing the self-efficacy beliefs of first-year engineering students. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(1), 39--47.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Into the Loop (2011). Retrieved at: http://www.exploringcs.org/Google Scholar
- Israel, M., Pearson, J.N., Tapia, T., Wherfel, Q.M., & Reese, G. (2015a). Supporting all learners in school-wide computational thinking: A cross-case qualitative analysis. Computers & Education, 82, 263--279. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Israel, M., Wherfel, Q.M., Pearson, J. Shehab, S. & Tapia, T. (2015b). Empowering K-12 student with disabilities to learn computational thinking and computer programming. Teaching Exceptional Children, 48(1), 45--53Google ScholarCross Ref
- King, H. (2011). Supporting STEM teaching and learning of visually impaired students: An ISE research brief discussing in Rule et al. Impact of adaptive materials on teachers and their students with visual impairments in secondary science and mathematics classes. Retrieved from http://www.relatingresearchtopractice.org/article/250Google Scholar
- Kumar, D., Ramasamy, R., & Stefanich, G. (2001). Science for students with visual impairments. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 5. Retrieved from http://ejse.southwestern.edu/article/view/7658/5425 30 April 2013.Google Scholar
- Ludi, S., & Reichlmayr, T. (2011). The Use of Robotics to Promote Computing to Pre-College Students with Visual Impairments. ACM Transactions on Computing Education. ACM New York, NY, Volume 11 Issue 3, October 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ludi, S. (2014) Robotics Programming Tools for Blind Students. Journal on Technology and Persons with Disabilities. CSUN Center on Disabilities, http://scholarworks.csun.edu/handle/10211.3/125008, pp. 81--91.Google Scholar
- Maltese, A.V., & Tai, R.H. (2011). Pipeline persistence: Examining the association of educational experiences with earned degrees in STEM among U.S. students. Science Education, 95, 877--907.Google ScholarCross Ref
- McDonald, C. (2016). A New System Lets Blind Kids Build Lego Sets. Popular Science. Retrieved at: http://www.popsci.com/blind-high-school-student-helps-make-legos-accessibleGoogle Scholar
- Moore, J.L. (2006). A qualitative investigation of African American males? career trajectory in engineering: Implications for teachers, school counselors, and parents. Teachers College Record, 108(2), 246--266.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mutch-Jones, K., Bernstein, D., Ludi, S. (2016). Creating access to computer science: Enhancing engagement and learning for students with visual impairments. Visual Impairment and Deafblind Education Quarterly, 61(4), 38--51.Google Scholar
- National Science Foundation (2015), Division of Science Resources Statistics. Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering. Arlington, VA: NSF 15--311.Google Scholar
- Nourbakhsh, I., Crowley, K., Bhave, A., Hamner, E., Hsiu, T., Perez-Bergquist, A., et al., (2005). The Robot Autonomy Mobile Robotics Course: Robot Design, Curriculum Design and Educational Assessment. Autonomous Robotics Journal 18(1). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nugent, G., Barker, B.S., Grandgenett, N., & Adamchuk, V.I. (2010). Impact of robotics and geospatial technology interventions on youth STEM learning and attitudes. Teacher Education Faculty Publications. Paper 33. Available at http://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/tedfacpub/33Google ScholarCross Ref
- Resnick, M., Berg, R., & Eisenberg, M. (2000). Beyond black boxes: Bringing transparently and aesthetics back to scientific investigation. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(1), 7--30.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Reynolds, B., Mehalik, M.M., Lovell, M.R., & Schunn, C.D. (2009). Increased student awareness of and interest in engineering as a career option through design-based learning. International Journal of Engineering Education, 25(4), 788--798.Google Scholar
- Robot Building Instructions. Retrieved from: http://robotsquare.com/2012/02/27/tutorial-manty/Google Scholar
- Sullivan, F., (2008). Robotics and science literacy: Thinking skills, science process skills and systems understanding. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(3), 373--394.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tai, R.H., Liu, C.Q., Maltese, A.V., & Fan, X. (2006). Planning early for careers in science. Science, 312, 1143--1144.Google ScholarCross Ref
- US Department of Education. (2011). The Nation's Report Card: Science 2011. Retrieved from http://nationsreportcard.gov/science 2011/g8_nat.aspx'subtab_id=Tab _6&tab_id=tab3#chartGoogle Scholar
- Wolffe, K., & Sacks, S. Z. (1997). "The Lifestyles of Blind, Low Vision, and Sighted Youths: A Quantitative Comparison", Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, May-June, 91, (3), pp. 245--257.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Enhanced Robotics!: Improving Building and Programming Learning Experiences for Students with Visual Impairments
Recommendations
ECS4Alabama: A State-Wide Effort to Provide Access to Authentic Computer Science Education in Predominantly Rural and High Minority Schools
SIGCSE '19: Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science EducationThis poster provides a description of an NSF-sponsored project entitled "ECS4Alabama" that addresses one of the nation's areas of highest priority in K-12 education: To offer all children opportunities for preparation in authentic Computer Science, with ...
The Use of Robotics to Promote Computing to Pre-College Students with Visual Impairments
This article describes an outreach program to broaden participation in computing to include more students with visual impairments. The precollege workshops target students in grades 7--12 and engage students with robotics programming. The use of ...
Developing Computational Thinking through a Virtual Robotics Programming Curriculum
Computational thinking describes key principles from computer science that are broadly generalizable. Robotics programs can be engaging learning environments for acquiring core computational thinking competencies. However, few empirical studies evaluate ...
Comments