skip to main content
10.1145/3164541.3164640acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicuimcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

KEM-DT: A Knowledge Engineering Methodology to Produce an Integrated Rules Set using Decision Tree Classifiers

Authors Info & Claims
Published:05 January 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

In artificial intelligence, knowledge engineering is one of the key research areas in which knowledge-based systems are developed to solve the real-world problems and helps in decision making. For constructing a rule-based knowledge base, normally single decision tree classifier is used to produce If-Then rules (i.e. production rules). In the health-care domain, these machine generated rules are normally not well accepted by domain experts due to knowledge credibility issues. Keeping in view these facts, this paper proposes a knowledge engineering methodology called KEM-DT, which generates classification models of multiple decision trees, transforms them into production rules sets, and lastly, after rules verification and validation from an expert, integrates them to construct an integrated as well as a credible rule-based knowledge base. Finally, in order to realize the KEM-DT methodology, a Data-Driven Knowledge Acquisition Tool (DDKAT) is developed.

References

  1. M. Ali, M. Hussain, S. Lee, and B. H. Kang. Sakem: A semi-automatic knowledge engineering methodology for building rule-based knowledgebase. In International Symposium on Perception, Action, and Cognitive Systems (PACS2016), pages 63--64, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. R. Ali, S. Lee, and T. C. Chung. Accurate multi-criteria decision making methodology for recommending machine learning algorithm. Expert Systems with Applications, 71:257--278, 2017. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. J. L. Ardoint, P. Bonnard, and H. Citeau. Composite production rules, Jan. 27 2015. US Patent 8,943,003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. N. Caetano, P. Cortez, and R. M. Laureano. Using data mining for prediction of hospital length of stay: An application of the crisp-dm methodology. In International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, pages 149--166. Springer, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. X. Guo and Y. Li. Research on knowledge representation in expert system. In International Conference on Education Technology, Management and Humanities Science (ETMHS 2015), pages 873--876, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. G. Holmes, M. Hall, and E. Prank. Generating rule sets from model trees. Advanced Topics in Artificial Intelligence, pages 1--12, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. M. Humphrey, S. J. Cunningham, and I. H. Witten. Knowledge visualization techniques for machine learning. Intelligent Data Analysis, 2(1-4):333--347, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. M. Hussain, M. Afzal, T. Ali, R. Ali, W. A. Khan, A. Jamshed, S. Lee, B. H. Kang, and K. Latif. Data-driven knowledge acquisition, validation, and transformation into hl7 arden syntax. Artificial intelligence in medicine, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. S. Luc. Wekatexttoxml: Convert weka decision trees into interoperable xml files, 2012. http://www.lucsorel.com/media/downloads/WekatextToXml.jar, 2012. Accessed: 2017-08-19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. J. Mesarić and D. Šebalj. Decision trees for predicting the academic success of students. Croatian Operational Research Review, 7(2):367--388, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. M. Omar and S.-L. Syed-Abdullah. Finding the effectiveness of software team members using decision tree. In Pattern Analysis, Intelligent Security and the Internet of Things, pages 107--115. Springer, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. J. R. Quinlan. Generating production rules from decision trees. In ijcai, volume 87, pages 304--307, 1987. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. D. Trevisani and L. Cecchi. Micromanagement basado en formaciones de grupo implementado con scripting dinámico---micromanagement group formations based on dynamic scripting implemented. In XX Argentine Congress of Computer Science (Buenos Aires), 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. G. Williams. Cross validation, data mining, desktop survival guide, 2010. https://www.togaware.com/datamining/survivor/Cross_Validation.html, 2010. Accessed: 2017-08-19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. I. H. Witten, E. Frank, M. A. Hall, and C. J. Pal. Data Mining: Practical machine learning tools and techniques. Morgan Kaufmann, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. M. Zorrilla and D. García-Saiz. A service oriented architecture to provide data mining services for non-expert data miners. Decision Support Systems, 55(1):399--411, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. KEM-DT: A Knowledge Engineering Methodology to Produce an Integrated Rules Set using Decision Tree Classifiers

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          IMCOM '18: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication
          January 2018
          628 pages
          ISBN:9781450363853
          DOI:10.1145/3164541

          Copyright © 2018 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 5 January 2018

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          IMCOM '18 Paper Acceptance Rate100of255submissions,39%Overall Acceptance Rate213of621submissions,34%
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader