H. Elbasri
ABSTRACT
The article presents a model of an agent that encourages a learner to improve and develop his/her performance and autonomy of learning. This agent is based on evaluations before, during and after the consultation of a pedagogical support and on certain criteria to trigger the metacognitive incentives. These incentives are necessary to maintain the motivation of the learner and incite them to construct a course reading plan and to choose a learning strategy that is more suited to a learning situation. The criteria which have been used take into account the speed of learning, attention, motivation, confidence, difficulty, the metacognitive level and the result of the learner's diagnostic, formative and summative evaluation.
We assign the agent the ability to assess and motivate the learner to plan learning and to choose an appropriate learning strategy.
- Hameed M, Akhtar N & Missen M S."RoleBased Multi-agent system for e-learning (MASel)", International journal of advanced computer science and applications Vol. 7. No. 3. pp. 194--200, 2016.Google Scholar
- Gregg Dawn G. "E-learning agents",The Learning Organization, Vol. 14 No. 4. pp. 300--312, 2007.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Khalil M. K. et al..MLIMAS,"A framework for machine learning in interactive multi-agent systems". Procedia Computer Science, 65 pp. 827835, 2015.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Marie Lefevre,"Computing Environments for Human Learning". November 2013.Google Scholar
- D. L. Butler and P. H. Winne, "Feedback and self-regulated learning: a theoretical synthesis," Review of Educational Research, Vol. 65, pp. 245--281, 1995.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Panahandeh E. and Esfandiari Asl S., "The effect of planning and monitoring as metacognitive strategies on Iranian EFL learners'argumentative writing accuracy", Procedia social and behavioral sciences, Vol. 98, may 6, 2014.Google Scholar
- Bannert M., Hildebrand M., Mengelkamp C., "Effect of a metacognitive support device in learning environments", Computers in Humain Behavior, 25, pp. 829--835, 2009. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lehmann, T., Heahnlein, I., & Ifenthaler, D., "Cognitive, metacognitive and motivational perspectives on preflection in self-regulated online learning", Computers in Human Behavior, 32, pp. 313--323, 2014.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Shih, M., Feng, J., & Tsai, C. C., "Research and trends in the field of e-learning from 2001 to 2005: a content analysis of cognitive studies in selected journals", Computers & Education, 51(2), pp. 955--967, 2008. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hadwin, A., & Oshige, M. "Self-regulation, coregulation, and socially shared regulation: exploring perspectives of social in self-regulated learning theory", Teachers College Record,113(2), pp. 240--264, 2011.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mehrak R., Maral K.., (2012). "The role of metacognitive listening strategies a wareness and podcast-use readiness in using podcasting for learning English as a foreign language", Computers in Human Behavior 28, pp. 1153--1161, 2012. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Elisabeth Norman, Bjarte Furnes, "The relationship between metacognitive experiences and learning: is there a difference between digital and non-digital study media?", Computers in Human Behavior 54, pp. 301--309, 2016. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Viau, R., "Motivation in school context", Brussels, DeBoeck,1994.Google Scholar
- Zimmerman, B.J.& Martinez-Pons, M.,"Student differences in self- regulatedlearning: relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use" Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, pp. 51--59, 1990.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Y Vovides, S Sanchez-Alonso, V Mitropoulou, G Nickmans, « The use of e-learning course management systems to support learning strategies and to improve self-regulated learning", Educational Research Review, Vol 2 No 1, pp. 64--74, 2007/12/31, Éditeur Elsevier.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Berardi-Coletta, B., Buyer, L. S., Dominowski, R. L., &Rellinger, E. R.,"Metacognition and problem solving: a process-oriented approach", Journal of Experimental Psychology, 21, pp. 205--223, 1995.Google Scholar
- Zimmerman, B.J., "A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning", Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, pp. 329--339, 1989.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Abrecht, R., "Formative evaluation: a critical analysis", Brussels. DeBoeck, L. 1991.Google Scholar
- De Peretti, A.,"Compendium of formative evaluation instruments and processes", Vol. 1. Paris,1986, INRP.Google Scholar
- Zimmerman, B.J., "Attaining self-regulation: a social cognitive perspective" in M. Boekaerts, P.R. Pintrich& M. Zeidner (Eds.), "Handbook of self-regulation: theory, research, and applications", pp. 13--41, 2000, San Diego, academic Press.Google Scholar
- Scallon, G., "Self-evaluation: a heavy trend in evaluation". Educational life, 103, 1997, pp. 27--31, 1997.Google Scholar
- Scallon, G., "Learning portfolio: a short guide", 2003Google Scholar
- Berardi-Coletta, B., Buyer, L. S., Dominowski, R. L., & Rellinger, E. R. "Metacognition and problem solving: a process-oriented approach", Journal of Experimental Psychology, 21, pp. 205--223, 1995.Google Scholar
- Lin, X. D., & Lehman, J. D., "Supporting learning of variable control in acomputerbased biology environment: effects of prompting college students to reflect on their ownthinking", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, pp. 837--858, 1999.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Brown A.L. &Palincsar A.S., (1989). "guided, cooperative learning and individual knowledge acquisition" in L. B. Resnick (ed.) "Knowing, learning and instruction: essays in honor of RobertGlaser", pp. 393--451, 1989,Hillsdale, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Flavell, J.H., "speculations about the nature and development of metacognition" in F.E. Weinert& R.H. Kluwe (Eds), "Metacognition, motivation, and understanding", pp. 22--29, 1987, Hillsdale, N.J, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- J. Ferber, O. Gutknecht, "Aalaadin: a meta-model for the analysis and design of organizations in multi-agent systems", ICMAS, 98 International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems, pp. 128--135, 1998, Paris, Y. Demazeau (ed), IEEE Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Busoniu L, BabuskaR., Schutter B. D. "A comprehensive survey of multi-agent reinforcement learning". IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 2008, Part C"applications and reviews" 38, pp. 156--172, 2008. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Wooldridge, "Agent-based software engineering", IEEE Proceedings-software, 144(1), pp. 26--37, 1997.Google ScholarCross Ref
- N.R. Jennings, M. Wooldridge, "agent-oriented software engineering" in "Multi-agent system engineering", s.l., Springer, pp. 1--7, 1999. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C., Badica, Z., Budimac, H. D. Burkhard, M. Ivanović, "Software agents:languages, tools, platforms", Computer Science and InformationSystems/ComSIS, 8(2), pp. 255--298, 2011.Google ScholarCross Ref
- O'Malley, J.M., Chamot, A.U., and Küpper, L. Listening comprehension strategies in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 10, pp. 418--37,1989.Google ScholarCross Ref
Recommendations
A Scaffolding Design for Pedagogical Agents within the Higher-Education Context
ICETC '19: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Education Technology and ComputersThe use of scaffolding in the design of pedagogical agents has been carried out by many researchers and has a significant impact on online learning. However, how scaffolding by pedagogical agents is applied to individual and group settings is not ...
Towards a Conceptual Framework of GBL Design for Engagement and Learning of Curriculum-based Content
This paper aims to show best practices of GBL design for engagement. It intends to show how teachers can implement GBL in a collaborative, comprehensive and systematic way, in the classrooms, and probably outside the classrooms, based on empirical ...
From e-learning to games-based e-learning: using interactive technologies in teaching an IS course
The e-phenomenon has profoundly changed many aspects of society and, inevitably, has a commensurate impact on higher education. E-learning has now evolved from a marginal form of education to a commonly accepted alternative to traditional face-to-face ...
Comments