skip to main content
10.1145/3170427.3180286acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Mental Models and Home Virtual Assistants (HVAs)

Published:20 April 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

This study examines how users interact with Google Home, which is a type of home virtual assistant (HVA). Users are expected to speak to HVAs in a conversational manner; however, there has been little research looking at users' mental models for what kinds of interactions they think the devices are capable of. To investigate users' mental models, I conducted user study sessions in which I gave novice users several tasks to complete, and asked them to think aloud as they completed those tasks. I elicited two mental models (push, pull) from verbal strategies they use to complete the task. My findings help to better understand why users may be reluctant to use HVAs, and provide design guidance for future conversational interfaces.

References

  1. ERIC ENGE. 2017. Digital Personal Assistants: Which Is Smartest? | Stone Temple. Retrieved December 29, 2017 from https://www.stonetemple.com/digital-personal-assistants-test.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Motahhare Eslami, Karrie Karahalios, Christian Sandvig, et al. 2016. First I "like" it, then I hide it: Folk Theories of Social Feeds. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '16, 2371--2382. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Milica Gašić, Dilek Hakkani-Tür, and Asli Celikyilmaz. 2017. Spoken language understanding and interaction: Machine learning for human-like conversational systems. Computer Speech and Language 0: 5--7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. M. Granger Morgan, Baruch Fischhoff, Ann Bostrom, and Cynthia J. Atman. 2002. Mental Models Interviews. Risk communication. A Mental Models Approach: 63--83.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Natalie a. Jones, Helen Ross, Timothy Lynam, Pascal Perez, and Anne Leitch. 2011. Mental Model an Interdisciplinary Synthesis of Theory and Methods. Ecology and Society 16, 1: 46--46.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Jeonghyun Kim. 2006. Task as a predictable indicator for information seeking behavior on the Web. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/305277561?accountid=14643%5Cnhttp://mlbsfx.sibi.usp.br:3410/sfxlcl41?url_ver=Z39.882004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&genre=dissertations+%26+theses&sid=ProQ:ProQuest+Dissertations+%26+Theses+Global&atit.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Kyung-Sun Kim and Bryce Allen. 2002. Cognitive and task influences on Web searching behavior. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 53, 2: 109--119. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Ewa Luger and Abigail Sellen. 2016. "Like Having a Really Bad PA": The Gulf between User Expectation and Experience of Conversational Agents. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '16: 5286--5297. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Roger K. Moore. 2017. Is spoken language all-or-nothing? Implications for future speech-based human-machine interaction. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, 281--291.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Donald A. Norman. 1983. Some Observations on Mental Models. In Mental Models. 7--14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Donald A. Norman. 2013. The Design of Everyday Things. Revised and expanded edition.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Martin Porcheron, Joel E. Fischer, and Sarah Sharples. 2017. "Do Animals Have Accents?": Talking with Agents in Multi-Party Conversation. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, 207--219. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Stuart Reeves. 2017. Some Conversational Challenges of Talking with Machines. Companion of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing CSCW '17 Companion, 431--436.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Xin Rong, Adam Fourney, Robin N. Brewer, Meredith Ringel Morris, and Paul N. Bennett. 2017. Managing Uncertainty in Time Expressions for Virtual Assistants. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '17, 568--579. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Rick Wash and Emilee Rader. 2011. Influencing mental models of security. Proceedings of the 2011 workshop on New security paradigms workshop NSPW '11, 57. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Mental Models and Home Virtual Assistants (HVAs)

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI EA '18: Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2018
      3155 pages
      ISBN:9781450356213
      DOI:10.1145/3170427

      Copyright © 2018 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 20 April 2018

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • abstract

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI EA '18 Paper Acceptance Rate1,208of3,955submissions,31%Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader