ABSTRACT
This study examines how users interact with Google Home, which is a type of home virtual assistant (HVA). Users are expected to speak to HVAs in a conversational manner; however, there has been little research looking at users' mental models for what kinds of interactions they think the devices are capable of. To investigate users' mental models, I conducted user study sessions in which I gave novice users several tasks to complete, and asked them to think aloud as they completed those tasks. I elicited two mental models (push, pull) from verbal strategies they use to complete the task. My findings help to better understand why users may be reluctant to use HVAs, and provide design guidance for future conversational interfaces.
- ERIC ENGE. 2017. Digital Personal Assistants: Which Is Smartest? | Stone Temple. Retrieved December 29, 2017 from https://www.stonetemple.com/digital-personal-assistants-test.Google Scholar
- Motahhare Eslami, Karrie Karahalios, Christian Sandvig, et al. 2016. First I "like" it, then I hide it: Folk Theories of Social Feeds. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '16, 2371--2382. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Milica Gašić, Dilek Hakkani-Tür, and Asli Celikyilmaz. 2017. Spoken language understanding and interaction: Machine learning for human-like conversational systems. Computer Speech and Language 0: 5--7.Google Scholar
- M. Granger Morgan, Baruch Fischhoff, Ann Bostrom, and Cynthia J. Atman. 2002. Mental Models Interviews. Risk communication. A Mental Models Approach: 63--83.Google Scholar
- Natalie a. Jones, Helen Ross, Timothy Lynam, Pascal Perez, and Anne Leitch. 2011. Mental Model an Interdisciplinary Synthesis of Theory and Methods. Ecology and Society 16, 1: 46--46.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jeonghyun Kim. 2006. Task as a predictable indicator for information seeking behavior on the Web. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/305277561?accountid=14643%5Cnhttp://mlbsfx.sibi.usp.br:3410/sfxlcl41?url_ver=Z39.882004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&genre=dissertations+%26+theses&sid=ProQ:ProQuest+Dissertations+%26+Theses+Global&atit.Google Scholar
- Kyung-Sun Kim and Bryce Allen. 2002. Cognitive and task influences on Web searching behavior. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 53, 2: 109--119. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ewa Luger and Abigail Sellen. 2016. "Like Having a Really Bad PA": The Gulf between User Expectation and Experience of Conversational Agents. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '16: 5286--5297. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Roger K. Moore. 2017. Is spoken language all-or-nothing? Implications for future speech-based human-machine interaction. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, 281--291.Google Scholar
- Donald A. Norman. 1983. Some Observations on Mental Models. In Mental Models. 7--14.Google Scholar
- Donald A. Norman. 2013. The Design of Everyday Things. Revised and expanded edition.Google Scholar
- Martin Porcheron, Joel E. Fischer, and Sarah Sharples. 2017. "Do Animals Have Accents?": Talking with Agents in Multi-Party Conversation. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, 207--219. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Stuart Reeves. 2017. Some Conversational Challenges of Talking with Machines. Companion of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing CSCW '17 Companion, 431--436.Google Scholar
- Xin Rong, Adam Fourney, Robin N. Brewer, Meredith Ringel Morris, and Paul N. Bennett. 2017. Managing Uncertainty in Time Expressions for Virtual Assistants. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '17, 568--579. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rick Wash and Emilee Rader. 2011. Influencing mental models of security. Proceedings of the 2011 workshop on New security paradigms workshop NSPW '11, 57. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Mental Models and Home Virtual Assistants (HVAs)
Recommendations
Mixed-initiative Personal Assistants
SIGCSE '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science EducationSpecification and implementation of flexible human-computer dialogs is challenging because of the complexity involved in rendering the dialog responsive to a vast number of varied paths through which users might desire to complete the dialog. To address ...
Exploring the Opinions of Experts in Conversational Design: A Study on Users’ Mental Models of Voice Assistants
Human-Computer Interaction. User Experience and BehaviorAbstractVoice Assistants (VAs) are growing in popularity, but some barriers to these systems’ usage and adoption still prevail. Such obstacles may be related to users’ mental models, which are unaligned with VAs’ actual capabilities. Considering the ...
Daisy: A Friendly Conversational Agent for Older Adults
CUI '20: Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Conversational User InterfacesWe present Daisy, a voice-controlled conversational agent embodied as a household potted flower. Daisy has been designed for the needs of older adults, providing companionship in times of social isolation by engaging with them in casual conversation, ...
Comments