skip to main content
10.1145/3170427.3186320acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
panel

The Algorithm and the User: How Can HCI Use Lay Understandings of Algorithmic Systems?

Published:20 April 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

In studying the increasing role that opaque, algorithmically-driven systems, such as social media feeds, play in society and people's everyday lives, user folk theories are emerging as one powerful lens with which to examine the relationship between user and algorithmic system. Folk theories allow researchers to better see from users' own perspectives how they understand these systems and how their understanding impacts their behavior. However, this approach is still new. Methods, interpretation, and future directions are up for debate. This panel will be an active discussion of the contribution of folk theories to HCI to date, how to advance a folk theory perspective, and how this perspective can bridge academic and industry study of these systems. Our panel gathers key folk theory HCI researchers from academia and industry to share their perspectives and engage the CHI audience.

References

  1. Michael S. Bernstein, Eytan Bakshy, Moira Burke, and Brian Karrer. 2013. Quantifying the invisible audience in social networks. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 21--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Engin Bozdag. 2013. Bias in algorithmic filtering and personalization. Ethics and Information Technology, 15, 3: 209--227. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Michael A. DeVito, Jeremy Birnholtz, and Jeffrey T. Hancock. 2017. Platforms, People, and Perception: Using Affordances to Understand Self-Presentation on Social Media. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, 740--754. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Michael A. DeVito, Jeremy Birnholtz, Jeffrey T. Hancock, Megan French, and Sunny Liu. 2018. How People Form Folk Theories of Social Media Feeds and What It Means for How We Study SelfPresentation. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Michael A. DeVito, Darren Gergle, and Jeremy Birnholtz. 2017. "Algorithms ruin everything": #RIPTwitter, Folk Theories, and Resistance to Algorithmic Change in Social Media. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 3163--3174. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Motahhare Eslami, Karrie Karahalios, Christian Sandvig, Kristen Vaccaro, Aimee Rickman, Kevin Hamilton, and Alex Kirlik. 2016. First I "like" it, then I hide it: Folk Theories of Social Feeds. In Proceedings of the 34rd Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2371--2382. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Megan French and Jeff T. Hancock. 2017. What's the Folk Theory? Reasoning About Cyber-Social Systems. Paper presented at the 67th Annual Confrence of the International Communication Association (San Diego, CA).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Susan A. Gelman and Cristine H. Legare. 2011. Concepts and folk theories. Annual Review of Anthropology, 40, 1: 379--398.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Tarleton Gillespie. 2014. The Relevance of Algorithms. In Media technologies: Essays on communication, materiality, and society, Tarleton Gillespie, Pablo Boczkowski and Kirsten Foot (ed.). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 167--193.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Frank C. Keil. 2010. The feasibility of folk science. Cognitive science, 34, 5: 826--862.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Frank Pasquale. 2015. The black box society: The secret algorithms that control money and information. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The Algorithm and the User: How Can HCI Use Lay Understandings of Algorithmic Systems?

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI EA '18: Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2018
      3155 pages
      ISBN:9781450356213
      DOI:10.1145/3170427

      Copyright © 2018 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 20 April 2018

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • panel

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI EA '18 Paper Acceptance Rate1,208of3,955submissions,31%Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader