Casey Fiesler
Jeff Hancock
Amy Bruckman
Melissa Densmore
ABSTRACT
An ongoing challenge within the HCI research community is the development of community norms for research ethics in the face of evolving technology and methods. Building upon a successful town hall meeting at CHI 2017, this panel will include members of the SIGCHI Research Ethics Committee, but will be structured to facilitate a roundtable discussion and to collect input about current challenges and processes. The panel will pose open questions and invite audience discussion of best practices focused on issues such as cultural and disciplinary differences in ethical norms. There will also be discussion of how ethical issues are handled in SIGCHI paper submission and reviews, processes for how we might create and disseminate ethics resources, and regulatory issues such as the recent IRB changes for U.S. institutions.
- Tamara Alsheikh, Jennifer A. Rode, and Sian E. Lindley. 2011. (Whose) value-sensitive design: A study of long-distance relationships in the Arabic cultural context. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW), 75--84. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Alissa N. Antle. 2017. The ethics of doing research with vulnerable populations. interactions 24, 6: 74--77. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Barocas and Helen Nissenbaum. 2014. Big data's end run around anonymity and consent. In Privacy, big data, and the public good: Frameworks for engagement, J. Lane, V. Stodden, S. Bender and Helen Nissenbaum (eds.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 44--75.Google Scholar
- Steve Benford, Chris Greenhalgh, Bob Anderson, Rachel Jacobs, Mike Golembewski, Marina Jirotka, Bernd Carsten Stahl, Job Temmermans, Gabriella Giannachi, Matt Adams, Ju Row Farr, Nick Tandavanitj, and Kirsty Jennings. 2015. The Ethical Implications of HCI's Turn to the Cultural. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 24, 1: 24--37. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pernille Bjorn, Casey Fiesler, Michael Muller, Jessica A. Pater, and Pamela Wisniewski. 2018. Research Ethics Town Hall Meeting. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP)2. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Alan Borning and Michael Muller. 2012. Next steps for value sensitive design. Proceedings of the 2012 ACM annual conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '12: 1125--1134. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. C. H. Bromseth. 2002. Public places - public activities? Methodological approaches and ethical dilemmas in research on computer-mediated communication contexts. In Resesarching ICTs in Context, A. Morrison (ed.). University of Oslo, 33-- 61.Google Scholar
- Barry Brown, Alexandra Weilenmann, Donald Mcmillan, and Airi Lampinen. 2016. Five Provocations for Ethical HCI Research. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), 852--863. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Amy S. Bruckman, Casey Fiesler, Jeff Hancock, and Cosmin Munteanu. 2017. CSCW Research Ethics Town Hall: Working Towards Community Norms. In Companion of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW Companion). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mike Conway. 2014. Ethical issues in using twitter for public health surveillance and research: Developing a taxonomy of ethical concepts from the research literature. Journal of Medical Internet Research 16, 12.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Christopher Le Dantec, Erika Shehan Poole, and Susan P. Wyche. 2009. Values as lived experience: Evolving value sensitive design in support of value discovery. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI): 1141--1150. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lynn Dombrowski, Ellie Harmon, and Sarah Fox. 2016. Social Justice-Oriented Interaction Design: Outlining Key Design Strategies and Commitments. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS), 656--671. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Casey Fiesler, Pamela Wisniewski, Jessica Pater, and Nazanin Andalibi. 2016. Ethics and Obligations for Studying Digital Communities. In GROUP '16 Companion. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Casey Fiesler, Alyson Young, Tamara Peyton, Amy S. Bruckman, Mary Gray, Jeff Hancock, and Wayne Lutters. 2015. Ethics for Studying Online Sociotechnical Systems in a Big Data World. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference Companion on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW Companion), 289--292. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Christopher Frauenberger, Amy S. Bruckman, Cosmin Munteanu, Melissa Densmore, and Jenny Waycott. 2017. Research Ethics in HCI: A Town Hall Meeting. Proceedings of the CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Christopher Frauenberger, Marjo Rauhala, and Geraldine Fitzpatrick. 2016. In-Action Ethics. Interacting with Computers 29, 2: 220--236.Google Scholar
- James Grimmelmann. 2015. The Law and Ethics of Experiments on Social Media Users. University of Colorado Technology Law Journal 13: 219--272.Google Scholar
- James M. Hudson and Amy Bruckman. 2004. "Go Away": Participant Objections to Being Studied and the Ethics of Chatroom Research. The Information Society 20, 2: 127--139.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Molly Jackman and Lauri Kanerva. 2016. Evolving the IRB: Building Robust Review for Industry Research. Washington and Lee Law Review 72, 3.Google Scholar
- Sze Yin Kwok, Anya Skatova, Victoria Shipp, and Andy Crabtree. 2015. The Ethical Challenges of Experience Sampling Using Wearable Cameras. 1054--1057. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cosmin Munteanu, Heather Molyneaux, Wendy Moncur, Mario Romero, Susan O'Donnell, and John Vines. 2015. Situational Ethics: Re-thinking Approaches to Formal Ethics Requirements for Human-Computer Interaction. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), 105--114. Google ScholarDigital Library
- N. Nebeker, C., Harlow, J., Giacinto-Espinoza, R., Linares-Orozco, R., Bloss, C., Weibel. 2017. Ethical and regulatory challenges of research using pervasive sensing and other emerging technologies: IRB perspectives. American Journal of Bioethics: Empirical Bioethics 8, 4: 266--276.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Emily Porter, Chris Bopp, Elizabeth Gerber, and Amy Voida. 2017. Reappropriating Hackathons: The Production Work of the CHI4Good Day of Service. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), 810--814. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kristen Vaccaro, Karrie Karahalios, Christian Sandvig, Kevin Hamilton, and Cedric Langbort. 2015. Agree or Cancel? Research and Terms of Service Compliance. In 2015 CSCW Workshop on Ethics for Studying Sociotechnical Systems in a Big Data World.Google Scholar
- Jessica Vitak, Nicholas Proferes, Katie Shilton, and Zahra Ashktorab. 2017. Ethics Regulation in Social Computing Research: Examining the Role of Institutional Review Boards. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 12, 5: 372--382.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jessica Vitak, Katie Shilton, and Z. Ashktorab. 2016. Beyond the Belmont Principles: Ethical Challenges, Practices, and Beliefs in the Online Data Research Community. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW), 941--953. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jenny Waycott, Cosmin Munteanu, Hilary Davis, Anja Thieme, Stacy Branham, Wendy Moncur, Roisin McNaney, and John Vines. 2017. Ethical Encounters in HCI: Implications for Research in Sensitive Settings. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Graham R. Williamson and Sue Prosser. 2002. Action research: Politics, ethics and participation. Journal of Advanced Nursing 40, 5: 587--593.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Pamela J. Wisniewski, Jessica Vitak, Xinru Page, Bart Knijnenburg, Yang Wang, and Casey Fiesler. 2017. In Whose Best Interest? Exploring the Real, Potential, and Imagined Ethical Concerns in Privacy-Focused Agenda. In Companion of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW Companion). Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Research Ethics for HCI: A Roundtable Discussion
Recommendations
Research Ethics and Regulation: An Open Forum
CSCW '18 Companion: Companion of the 2018 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social ComputingAn ongoing challenge within the diverse HCI and social computing research communities is understanding research ethics in the face of evolving technology and methods. Building upon successful town hall meetings at ACM conferences including CSCW, CHI, ...
Research Ethics in HCI: A Town Hall Meeting
CHI EA '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing SystemsAs interactive technologies evolve and reach into every aspect of modern life, research practices in human-computer interaction (HCI) have changed. The methodological and epistemological foundations of the field are shifting to reflect the diversity of ...
Research Ethics in HCI: A SIGCHI Community Discussion
CHI EA '22: Extended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsAn ongoing challenge within the HCI community is coming to a shared understanding of research ethics in the face of our diverse disciplinary traditions, evolving technologies and methods, and multiple geographic and cultural settings. Building upon ...
Comments