skip to main content
10.1145/3171221.3171249acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Bioluminescence-Inspired Human-Robot Interaction: Designing Expressive Lights that Affect Human's Willingness to Interact with a Robot

Authors Info & Claims
Published:26 February 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Bioluminescence is the production and emission of light by a living organism. It, as a means of communication, is of importance for the survival of various creatures. Inspired by bioluminescent light behaviors, we explore the design of expressive lights and evaluate the effect of such expressions on a human»s perception of and attitude toward an appearance-constrained robot. Such robots are in urgent need of finding effective ways to present themselves and communicate their intentions due to a lack of social expressivity. We particularly focus on the expression of attractiveness and hostility because a robot would need to be able to attract or keep away human users in practical human-robot interaction (HRI) scenarios. In this work, we installed an LED lighting system on a Roomba robot and conducted a series of two experiments. We first worked through a structured approach to determine the best light expression designs for the robot to show attractiveness and hostility. This resulted in four recommended light expressions. Further, we performed a verification study to examine the effectiveness of such light expressions in a typical HRI context. On the basis of the findings, we offer design guidelines for expressive lights that HRI researchers and practitioners could readily employ.

References

  1. 2015 (Accessed September 5, 2017). iRobot Create 2 Open Interface (OI): Specification based on the iRobot Roomba 600. https://cdn-shop.adafruit.com/datasheets/ create_2_Open_Interface_Spec.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2017 (Accessed September 5, 2017). iRobot Create 2 Programmable Robot. http: //www.irobot.com/About-iRobot/STEM/Create-2.aspxGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 2017 (Accessed September 5, 2017). Roomba. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ RoombaGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 2017 (Accessed September 5, 2017). What is bioluminescence? https://oceanservice. noaa.gov/facts/biolum.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Widder Edith. A. 2010. Bioluminescence in the Ocean: Origins of Biological, Chemical, and Ecological Diversity. Science 328, 5979 (2010), 704--708. arXiv:http://science.sciencemag.org/content/328/5979/704.full.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Adam Akers, Jo Barton, Rachel Cossey, Patrick Gainsford, Murray Griffin, and Dominic Micklewright. 2012. Visual Colour Perception in Green Exercise: Positive Effects on Mood and Perceived Exertion. Environmental Science and Technology 46, 16 (2012), 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Kim Baraka, Ana Paiva, and Manuela Veloso. 2016. Expressive Lights for Revealing Mobile Service Robot State. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 107--119.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Christoph Bartneck, Rosalia Chioke, Rutger Menges, and Inez Deckers. 2005. Robot Abuse--A Limitation of the Media Equation. In Interact 2005 Workshop on Abuse. Rome.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Cynthia Breazeal. 2002. Designing Sociable Robots. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Drazen Brscić., Hiroyuki Kidokoro, Yoshitaka Suehiro, and Takayuki Kanda. 2015. Escaping from Children's Abuse of Social Robots. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 59--66. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Jessica Rebecca Cauchard, Kevin Y. Zhai, Marco Spadafora, and James A. Landay. 2016. Emotion Encoding in Human-Drone Interaction. In The Eleventh ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction. IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 263--270. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2906831.2906878 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Szafir Daniel, Bilge Mutlu, and Terrence Fong. 2014. Communication of Intent in Assistive Free Flyers. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-robot Interaction. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 358--365. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Johannes Feldmaier, Tamara Marmat, Johannes Kuhn, and Klaus Diepold. 2016. Evaluation of a RGB-LED-based Emotion Display for Affective Agents. CoRR abs/1612.07303 (2016). arXiv:1612.07303 http://arxiv.org/abs/1612.07303Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Thomas Fincannon, Laura Barnes, Murphy Robin R., and Dawn Riddle. 2004. Evidence of the need for social intelligence in rescue robots. In Proceedings of the 14th IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Vol. 2. 1089--1095.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Levillain Florent, Zibetti Elisabetta, and Lefort Sébastien. 2017. Interacting with Non-anthropomorphic Robotic Artworks and Interpreting Their Behaviour. International Journal of Social Robotics 9, 1 (01 Jan 2017), 141--161.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Terrence Fong, Illah Nourbakhsh, and Kerstin Dautenhahn. 2003. A survey of socially interactive robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 42, 3 (2003), 143--166. Socially Interactive Robots.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Gianluigi Guido, Luigi Piper, M. Irene Prete, Antonio Mileti, and Carla M. Trisolini. 2017. Effects of Blue Lighting in Ambient and Mobile Settings on the Intention to Buy Hedonic and Utilitarian Products. Psychology&Marketing 34, 2 (2017), 215--226.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Chris Harrison, John Horstman, Gary Hsieh, and Scott Hudson. 2012. Unlocking the Expressivity of Point Lights. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1683--1692. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Haddock Steven HD, Mark A. Moline, and James F. Case. 2010. Bioluminescence in the Sea. Annual Review of Marine Science 2, 1 (2010), 443--493. PMID: 21141672.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Elliot Andrew J. 2015. Color and psychological functioning: A review of theoretical and empirical work. Frontiers in Psychology 6, APR (2015), 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Elliot Andrew J., Fairchild Mark D., and Franklin Anna. 2015. Handbook of Color Psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Elliot Andrew J. and Markus A. Maier. 2007. Color and psychological functioning. Current Directions in Psychological Science 16, 5 (2007), 250--254.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Elliot Andrew J. and Markus A. Maier. 2014. Color psychology: effects of perceiving color on psychological functioning in humans. Annual review of psychology 65 (2014), 95--120.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Yusuke Kato, Takayuki Kanda, and Hiroshi Ishiguro. 2015. May I Help You?: Design of Human-like Polite Approaching Behavior. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 35--42. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Joseph 'Jofish' Kaye. 2006. I Just Clicked to Say I Love You: Rich Evaluations of Minimal Communication. In CHI '06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 363--368. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Kazuki Kobayashi, Kotaro Funakoshi, Seiji Yamada, Mikio Nakano, Takanori Komatsu, and Yasunori Saito. 2011. Blinking light patterns as artificial subtle expressions in human-robot speech interaction. In Proceedings of the 20th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interaction Communication. IEEE, Atlanta, GA, USA, 181--186.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Steven Komarov, Katharina Reinecke, and Krzysztof Z. Gajos. 2013. Crowdsourcing performance evaluations of user interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13). 207--216. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Bethel Cindy L. 2009. Robots without faces: non-verbal social human-robot interaction. {dissertation/Ph.D.'s thesis}. University of South Florida. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Bethel Cindy L. and Robin R. Murphy. 2006. Affective Expression in Appearance Constrained Robots. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART Conference on Human-robot Interaction. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 327--328. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Bethel Cindy L. and Robin R. Murphy. 2007. Non-facial/Non-verbal Methods of Affective Expression As Applied to Robot-assisted Victim Assessment. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-robot Interaction. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 287--294. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Bethel Cindy L. and Robin R. Murphy. 2008. Survey of Non-facial/Non-verbal Affective Expressions for Appearance-Constrained Robots. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews) 38, 1 (Jan 2008), 83--92. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Eva Lenz, Sarah Diefenbach, and Marc Hassenzahl. 2013. Exploring Relationships Between Interaction Attributes and Experience. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 126--135. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Youn-kyung Lim, Sang-Su Lee, and Da-jung Kim. 2011. Interactivity attributes for expression-oriented interaction design. International Journal of Design 5, 3 (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Saerbeck Martin and Christoph Bartneck. 2010. Perception of affect elicited by robot motion. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 53--60. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Beaven C. Martyn and Johan Ekström. 2013. A Comparison of Blue Light and Caffeine Effects on Cognitive Function and Alertness in Humans. PLOS ONE 8, 10 (10 2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Andrii Matviienko, Vanessa Cobus, Heiko Müller, Jutta Fortmann, Andreas Löcken, Susanne Boll, Maria Rauschenberger, Janko Timmermann, Christoph Trappe, and Wilko Heuten. 2015. Deriving Design Guidelines for Ambient Light Systems. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 267--277. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Bilge Mutlu, Jodi Forlizzi, Illah Nourbakhsh, and Jessica Hodgins. 2006. The Use of Abstraction and Motion in the Design of Social Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 251--260. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Murphy Robin R., Dawn Riddle, and Eric Rasmussen. 2004. Robot-assisted medical reachback: a survey of how medical personnel expect to interact with rescue robots. In Proceedings of the 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. 301--306.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Mehta Ravi and Rui Juliet Zhu. 2009. Blue or Red? Exploring the Effect of Color on Cognitive Task Performances. Science 323, 5918 (2009), 1226--1229. arXiv:http://science.sciencemag.org/content/323/5918/1226.full.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Pericle Salvini, Gaetano Ciaravella, Wantai Yu., Giuseppe Ferri, Alessandro Manzi, Barbara Mazzolai, Cecilia Laschi, Sang-Rok Oh, and Paolo Dario. 2010. How safe are service robots in urban environments? Bullying a robot. 19th International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication (2010), 1--7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Satoru Satake., Takayuki Kanda, Dylan F. Glas, Michita Imai, Hiroshi Ishiguro, and Norihiro Hagita. 2009. How to approach humans--strategies for social robots to initiate interaction. In 2009 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on HumanRobot Interaction (HRI). 109--116. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. David Sirkin, Brian Mok, Stephen Yang, and Wendy Ju. 2015. Mechanical Ottoman: How Robotic Furniture Offers and Withdraws Support. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 11--18. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Daniel Szafir, Bilge Mutlu, and Terry Fong. 2015. Communicating Directionality in Flying Robots. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 19--26. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Kazunori Terada, Atsushi Yamauchi, and Akira Ito. 2012. Artificial emotion expression for a robot by dynamic color change. In Proceedings of the 21st IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. 314-- 321.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. S. N. Woods, M. L. Walters, K. L. Koay, and K. Dautenhahn. 2006. Methodological Issues in HRI: A Comparison of Live and Video-Based Methods in Robot to Human Approach Direction Trials. In Proceedings of the 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. 51--58.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Bioluminescence-Inspired Human-Robot Interaction: Designing Expressive Lights that Affect Human's Willingness to Interact with a Robot

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      HRI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
      February 2018
      468 pages
      ISBN:9781450349536
      DOI:10.1145/3171221

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 February 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      HRI '18 Paper Acceptance Rate49of206submissions,24%Overall Acceptance Rate242of1,000submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader