research-article

Robots And Racism

Authors:

Christoph Bartneck,

Kumar Yogeeswaran,

Graeme Woodward,

Robert Sparrow,

Friederike EysselAuthors Info & Claims

HRI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction

Pages 196 - 204

https://doi.org/10.1145/3171221.3171260

Published: 26 February 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Most robots currently being sold or developed are either stylized with white material or have a metallic appearance. In this research we used the shooter bias paradigm and several questionnaires to investigate if people automatically identify robots as being racialized, such that we might say that some robots are 'White' while others are 'Asian', or 'Black'. To do so, we conducted an extended replication of the classic social psychological shooter bias paradigm using robot stimuli to explore whether effects known from human-human intergroup experiments would generalize to robots that were racialized as Black and White. Reaction-time based measures revealed that participants demonstrated 'shooter-bias' toward both Black people and robot racialized as Black. Participants were also willing to attribute a race to the robots depending on their racialization and demonstrated a high degree of inter-subject agreement when it came to these attributions.

Supplementary Material

ZIP File (fp1135.zip)

Download
25.13 MB

References

[1]

Jasmin Bernotat, Friederike Eyssel, and Janik Sachse. 2017. Shape It -- The Influence of Robot Body Shape on Gender Perception in Robots. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 75--84.

[2]

Jean M Converse and Stanley Presser. 1986. Survey questions: Handcrafting the standardized questionnaire. Vol. 63. Sage, Thousand Oaks, California.

[3]

Joshua Correll, Sean M Hudson, Steffanie Guillermo, and Debbie S Ma. 2014. The police officer's dilemma: A decade of research on racial bias in the decision to shoot. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 8, 5 (2014), 201--213.

[4]

Joshua Correll, Bernadette Park, Charles M. Judd, and Bernd Wittenbrink. 2002. The police officer's dilemma: Using ethnicity to disambiguate potentially threatening individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83, 6 (2002), 1314--1329.

[5]

Joshua Correll, Geoffrey R Urland, and Tiffany A Ito. 2006. Event-related potentials and the decision to shoot: The role of threat perception and cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 42, 1 (2006), 120--128.

[6]

Nilanjana Dasgupta. 2004. Implicit ingroup favoritism, outgroup favoritism, and their behavioral manifestations. Social Justice Research 17, 2 (2004), 143--169.

[7]

Nilanjana Dasgupta and Luis M Rivera. 2006. From automatic antigay prejudice to behavior: the moderating role of conscious beliefs about gender and behavioral control. Journal of personality and social psychology 91, 2 (2006), 268--280.

[8]

Thierry Devos and Debbie S Ma. 2013. How "American" is Barack Obama? The role of national identity in a historic bid for the White House. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 43, 1 (2013), 214--226.

[9]

John F Dovidio, Kerry Kawakami, Craig Johnson, Brenda Johnson, and Adaiah Howard. 1997. On the nature of prejudice: Automatic and controlled processes. Journal of experimental social psychology 33, 5 (1997), 510--540.

[10]

Iniobong Essien, Marleen Stelter, Felix Kalbe, Andreas Koehler, Jana Mangels, and Stefanie Meliß. 2017. The shooter bias: Replicating the classic effect and introducing a novel paradigm. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 70 (2017), 41--47.

[11]

Friederike Eyssel and Frank Hegel. 2012. (S)he's got the look: Gender-stereotyping of social robots. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 42, 9 (2012), 2213--2230.

[12]

Friederike Eyssel and Dieta Kuchenbrandt. 2012. Social categorization of social robots: Anthropomorphism as a function of robot group membership. British Journal of Social Psychology 51 (2012), 724--731.

[13]

Friederike Eyssel and Steve Loughnan. 2013. "It don't matter if you're Black or White?" Effects of robot appearance and user prejudice on evaluations of a newly developed robot companion. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 8239 (2013), 422--431.

Digital Library

[14]

Russell H Fazio, Joni R Jackson, Bridget C Dunton, and Carol J Williams. 1995. Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline- Journal of personality and social psychology 69, 6 (1995), 1013--1027.

[15]

Susan T Fiske. 1998. Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. McGraw Hill, Boston, MA, 357--411.

[16]

Alexander R Green, Dana R Carney, Daniel J Pallin, Long H Ngo, Kristal L Raymond, Lisa I Iezzoni, and Mahzarin R Banaji. 2007. Implicit bias among physicians and its prediction of thrombolysis decisions for black and white patients. Journal of general internal medicine 22, 9 (2007), 1231--1238.

[17]

Anthony G Greenwald and Mahzarin R Banaji. 1995. Implicit social cognition: attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological review 102, 1 (1995), 4--27.

[18]

Anthony G Greenwald, Colin Tucker Smith, N Sriram, Yoav Bar-Anan, and Brian A Nosek. 2009. Implicit race attitudes predicted vote in the 2008 US presidential election. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy 9, 1 (2009), 241-- 253.

[19]

Jerry Kang, Nilanjana Dasgupta, Kumar Yogeeswaran, and Gary Blasi. 2010. Are ideal litigators white? Measuring the myth of colorblindness. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 7, 4 (2010), 886--915.

[20]

N. Mavridis, A. AlDhaheri, L. AlDhaheri, M. Khanii, and N. AlDarmaki. 2011. Transforming IbnSina into an advanced multilingual interactive android robot. In 2011 IEEE GCC Conference and Exhibition (GCC). IEEE, New York, NY, USA, 120--123.

[21]

Yara Mekawi and Konrad Bresin. 2015. Is the evidence from racial bias shooting task studies a smoking gun? Results from a meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 61, November 2015 (2015), 120--130.

[22]

Saul L Miller, Kate Zielaskowski, and E Ashby Plant. 2012. The basis of shooter biases: Beyond cultural stereotypes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 38, 10 (2012), 1358--1366.

[23]

Jahna Otterbacher and Michael Talias. 2017. S/He's Too Warm/Agentic!: The Influence of Gender on Uncanny Reactions to Robots. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 214--223.

Digital Library

[24]

Eyal Peer, Laura Brandimarte, Sonam Samat, and Alessandro Acquisti. 2017. Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 70, May 2017 (2017), 153 -- 163.

[25]

Aaron Powers, Sara Kiesler, Susan Fussell, and Cristen Torrey. 2007. Comparing a computer agent with a humanoid robot. In Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 2007 2nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on. ACM/IEEE, Arlington, USA, 145--152.

Digital Library

[26]

Juliane Reichenbach, Christoph Bartneck, and Julie Carpenter. 2006. Well done, Robot! The importance of praise and presence in human-robot collaboration. In Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2006. ROMAN 2006. The 15th IEEE International Symposium on. IEEE, Hatfield, UK, 86--90.

[27]

Jennifer A Richeson, Abigail A Baird, Heather L Gordon, Todd F Heatherton, Carrie L Wyland, Sophie Trawalter, and J Nicole Shelton. 2003. An fMRI investigation of the impact of interracial contact on executive function. Nature neuroscience 6, 12 (2003), 1323--1328.

[28]

Laurel D Riek and Don Howard. 2014. A code of ethics for the human-robot interaction profession. In Proceedings of We Robot. Social Science Research Network. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2757805

[29]

Michael Root. 2000. How We Divide the World. Philosophy of Science 67 (2000), S628--S639.

[30]

Dan-Olof Rooth. 2010. Automatic associations and discrimination in hiring: Real world evidence. Labour Economics 17, 3 (2010), 523--534.

[31]

Astrid M Rosenthal-von der Pütten, Nicole C Krämer, Laura Hoffmann, Sabrina Sobieraj, and Sabrina C Eimler. 2013. An experimental study on emotional reactions towards a robot. International Journal of Social Robotics 5, 1 (2013), 17--34.

[32]

Timothy P Schofield, Timothy Deckman, Christopher P Garris, C Nathan DeWall, and Thomas F Denson. 2015. Brief report: Evidence of ingroup bias on the shooter task in a Saudi sample. SAGE Open 5, 1 (2015), 1--6.

[33]

M. Siegel, C. Breazeal, and M. I. Norton. 2009. Persuasive Robotics: The influence of robot gender on human behavior. In 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE, New York, 2563--2568.

Digital Library

[34]

Mel Slater, Angus Antley, Adam Davison, David Swapp, Christoph Guger, Chris Barker, Nancy Pistrang, and Maria V Sanchez-Vives. 2006. A virtual reprise of the Stanley Milgram obedience experiments. PloS one 1, 1 (2006), e39.

[35]

Robert Sparrow. 2017. Robots, Rape, and Representation. International Journal of Social Robotics 9, 4 (2017), 465--477.

[36]

Damian A Stanley, Peter Sokol-Hessner, Mahzarin R Banaji, and Elizabeth A Phelps. 2011. Implicit race attitudes predict trustworthiness judgments and economic trust decisions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108, 19 (2011), 7710--7715.

[37]

Paul C Taylor. 2000. Appiah's uncompleted argument: WEB Du Bois and the reality of race. Social Theory and Practice 26, 1 (2000), 103--128.

[38]

Sam Thellman, Annika Silvervarg, Agneta Gulz, and Tom Ziemke. 2016. Physical vs. Virtual Agent Embodiment and Effects on Social Interaction. In Intelligent Virtual Agents: 16th International Conference, IVA 2016. Springer International Publishing, Los Angeles, USA, 412--415.

[39]

Christian Unkelbach, Joseph P. Forgas, and F. Denson, Thomas. 2008. The turban effect: The influence of Muslim headgear and induced affect on aggressive responses in the shooter bias paradigm. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 44 (2008), 1409--1413.

[40]

Astrid Marieke von der Pütten and Nicole C. Krämer. 2012. A Survey on Robot Appearances. In Proceedings of the Seventh Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 267--268.

Digital Library

[41]

Adam Waytz, John Caccioppo, and Nicholas Epley. 2014. Who Sees Human? The Stability and Importance of Individual Differences in Anthropomorphism. Perspectives in Psychological Science 5, 3 (2014), 219--232.

[42]

Ricarda Wullenkord, Marlena R Fraune, Friederike Eyssel, and Selma Sabanović. 2016. Getting in Touch: How imagined, actual, and physical contact affect evaluations of robots. In Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on. IEEE, New York, USA, 980--985.

[43]

Kumar Yogeeswaran and Nilanjana Dasgupta. 2010. Will the 'real' American please stand up? The effect of implicit national prototypes on discriminatory behavior and judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 36, 10 (2010), 1332--1345.

[44]

Kumar Yogeeswaran, Thierry Devos, and Kyle Nash. 2016. Understanding the Nature, Measurement, and Utility of Implicit Intergroup Biases. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 241--266.

Cited By

Elmoudden SWrench J(2024)The Future Is Already HereThe Role of Generative AI in the Communication Classroom10.4018/979-8-3693-0831-8.ch015(316-336)Online publication date: 23-Feb-2024
https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-0831-8.ch015
Barfield J(2024)The Role of Name, Origin, and Voice Accent in a Robot’s Ethnic IdentitySensors10.3390/s2419642124:19(6421)Online publication date: 4-Oct-2024
https://doi.org/10.3390/s24196421
Seaborn KKotani HPennefather P(2024)From “Made In” to Mukokuseki: Exploring the Visual Perception of National Identity in RobotsACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/368178214:1(1-21)Online publication date: 28-Aug-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3681782
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Robots And Racism
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)
    1. Empirical studies in HCI
    2. HCI theory, concepts and models

Recommendations

Robots Can Be More Than Black And White: Examining Racial Bias Towards Robots
AIES '19: Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society

Previous studies showed that using the 'shooter bias' paradigm, people demonstrate a similar racial bias toward dark colored robots over light colored robots (i.e., Black vs. White) as they do toward humans of similar skin tones [3]. However, such an ...
A Preliminary Study of the Effects of Racialization and Humanness on the Verbal Abuse of Female-Gendered Robots
HRI '18: Companion of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction

Recent research has indicated that people engage, and unabashedly so, in the verbal abuse of female-gendered robots. To understand whether this also cuts across racial lines, and furthermore, whether it differs from objectifying treatment of actual ...
Racial microaggressions and perceptions of Internet memes

Although more blatant forms of discrimination have declined, racial prejudice continues to manifest itself in subtle ways. For example, People of Color experience racial microaggressions (i.e., subtle slights or 'put downs') in their face-to-face ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

HRI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction

February 2018

468 pages

ISBN:9781450349536

DOI:10.1145/3171221

General Chairs:
Takayuki Kanda
ATR, Japan
,
Selma Ŝabanović
Indiana University Bloomington, USA
,
Program Chairs:
Guy Hoffman
Cornell University, USA
,
Adriana Tapus
ENSTA-ParisTech, France

Copyright © 2018 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

SIGAI: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
IEEE-RAS: Robotics and Automation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 26 February 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Conference

HRI '18

Sponsor:

SIGAI
SIGCHI
IEEE-RAS

HRI '18: ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction

March 5 - 8, 2018

IL, Chicago, USA

Acceptance Rates

HRI '18 Paper Acceptance Rate 49 of 206 submissions, 24%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 268 of 1,124 submissions, 24%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

75
Total Citations
View Citations
1,794
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)151
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)28

Reflects downloads up to 03 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Elmoudden SWrench J(2024)The Future Is Already HereThe Role of Generative AI in the Communication Classroom10.4018/979-8-3693-0831-8.ch015(316-336)Online publication date: 23-Feb-2024
https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-0831-8.ch015
Barfield J(2024)The Role of Name, Origin, and Voice Accent in a Robot’s Ethnic IdentitySensors10.3390/s2419642124:19(6421)Online publication date: 4-Oct-2024
https://doi.org/10.3390/s24196421
Seaborn KKotani HPennefather P(2024)From “Made In” to Mukokuseki: Exploring the Visual Perception of National Identity in RobotsACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/368178214:1(1-21)Online publication date: 28-Aug-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3681782
Pinhanez CFernandez RGrave MNogima JHoory R(2024)Creating an African American-Sounding TTS: Guidelines, Technical Challenges, and Surprising EvaluationsProceedings of the 29th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces10.1145/3640543.3645165(259-273)Online publication date: 18-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3640543.3645165
Yu XHoggenmüller MTomitsch M(2024)From Agent Autonomy to Casual Collaboration: A Design Investigation on Help-Seeking Urban RobotsProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642389(1-14)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642389
De Haas MHobbelink VSmakman MGrollman DBroadbent EJu WSoh HWilliams T(2024)Inclusive Dialogues: WokeBot Engaging Diversity DilemmasCompanion of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610978.3640650(379-382)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3610978.3640650
Hou YCheon EJung MGrollman DBroadbent EJu WSoh HWilliams T(2024)Power in Human-Robot InteractionProceedings of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610977.3634949(269-282)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3610977.3634949
Yogeeswaran KBartneck C(2024)Racialization and Bias toward HumanoidsThe Cambridge Handbook of the Law, Policy, and Regulation for Human–Robot Interaction10.1017/9781009386708.036(556-572)Online publication date: 7-Dec-2024
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009386708.036
(2024)Ethics, Culture, and Values Impacted by Human–Robot InteractionsThe Cambridge Handbook of the Law, Policy, and Regulation for Human–Robot Interaction10.1017/9781009386708.024(391-604)Online publication date: 7-Dec-2024
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009386708.024
Seaborn K(2024)Bots against BiasThe Cambridge Handbook of the Law, Policy, and Regulation for Human–Robot Interaction10.1017/9781009386708.023(362-390)Online publication date: 7-Dec-2024
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009386708.023
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Figures

Tables

Media

View Table of Conten