research-article

Public Access

Observing Robot Touch in Context: How Does Touch and Attitude Affect Perceptions of a Robot's Social Qualities?

Authors:

Matthias ScheutzAuthors Info & Claims

HRI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction

Pages 352 - 360

https://doi.org/10.1145/3171221.3171263

Published: 26 February 2018 Publication History

Abstract

The complex role of touch is an increasingly appreciated horizon for HRI research. The explicit and implicit registers of touch, both human-to-robot and robot-to-human, have opened up pressing questions in design and HRI ethics about embodiment, communication, care, and human affection. In this paper we present results of an MTurk survey about robot-initiated touch in a social context. We examine how a positive or negative attitude from the robot, as well as whether the robot touches an interactant, affects how a robot is judged as a worker and teammate. Our findings confirm previous empirical support for the idea of touch as enhancing social appraisals of a robot, though the extent of that positive tactile role was complicated and tempered by the survey responses» gender effects.

References

[1]

Mehdi Ammi, Virginie Demulier, Sylvain Caillou, Yoren Gaffary, Yacine Tsalamlal, Jean-Claude Martin, and Adriana Tapus . 2015. Haptic human-robot affective interaction in a handshaking social protocol Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. ACM, 263--270.

Digital Library

[2]

Brenna D Argall and Aude G Billard . 2010. A survey of tactile human--robot interactions. Robotics and autonomous systems Vol. 58, 10 (2010), 1159--1176.

Digital Library

[3]

Thomas Arnold and Matthias Scheutz . 2017 a. Beyond Moral Dilemmas: Exploring the Ethical Landscape in HRI. HRI. 445--452.

Digital Library

[4]

Thomas Arnold and Matthias Scheutz . 2017 b. The Tactile Ethics of Soft Robotics: Designing Wisely for Human--Robot Interaction. Soft Robotics, Vol. 4, 2 (2017), 81--87.

[5]

Christoph Bartneck, Dana Kulić, Elizabeth Croft, and Susana Zoghbi . 2009. Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. International journal of social robotics Vol. 1, 1 (2009), 71--81.

[6]

Aude Billard . 2017. On the mechanical, cognitive and sociable facets of human compliance and their robotic counterparts. Robotics and Autonomous Systems (2017), 157--164.

Digital Library

[7]

Silvia Bonaccio, Jane O'Reilly, Sharon L O'Sullivan, and Franccois Chiocchio . 2016. Nonverbal behavior and communication in the workplace: A review and an agenda for research. Journal of Management Vol. 42, 5 (2016), 1044--1074.

[8]

Agnetha Broos . 2005. Gender and information and communication technologies (ICT) anxiety: Male self-assurance and female hesitation. CyberPsychology & Behavior Vol. 8, 1 (2005), 21--31.

[9]

Judee K Burgoon and Deborah A Newton . 1991. Applying a social meaning model to relational message interpretations of conversational involvement: Comparing observer and participant perspectives. Southern Journal of Communication Vol. 56, 2 (1991), 96--113.

[10]

Julie Carpenter, Joan M Davis, Norah Erwin-Stewart, Tiffany R Lee, John D Bransford, and Nancy Vye . 2009. Gender representation and humanoid robots designed for domestic use. International Journal of Social Robotics Vol. 1, 3 (2009), 261--265.

[11]

Tiffany L Chen, Chih-Hung Aaron King, Andrea L Thomaz, and Charles C Kemp . 2014. An investigation of responses to robot-initiated touch in a nursing context. International Journal of Social Robotics Vol. 6, 1 (2014), 141--161.

[12]

Martin D Cooney, Shuichi Nishio, and Hiroshi Ishiguro . 2015. Importance of touch for conveying affection in a multimodal interaction with a small humanoid robot. International Journal of Humanoid Robotics Vol. 12, 01 (2015), 1550002.

[13]

Henriette Cramer, Nicander Kemper, Alia Amin, and Vanessa Evers . 2009. The effects of robot touch and proactive behaviour on perceptions of human-robot interactions Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 2009 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 275--276.

Digital Library

[14]

Matthew JC Crump, John V McDonnell, and Todd M Gureckis . 2013. Evaluating Amazon's Mechanical Turk as a tool for experimental behavioral research. PloS one, Vol. 8, 3 (2013), e57410.

[15]

Norah E Dunbar and Judee K Burgoon . 2005. Perceptions of power and interactional dominance in interpersonal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, Vol. 22, 2 (2005), 207--233.

[16]

Sinziana Gutiu . 2012. Sex robots and roboticization of consent. In We Robot 2012 conference, Coral Gables, Florida. Retrieved April, Vol. Vol. 15. 2013.

[17]

Takahiro Hirano, Masahiro Shiomi, Takamasa Iio, Mitsuhiko Kimoto, Ivan Tanev, Katsunori Shimohara, and Norihiro Hagita . 2017. How Do Communication Cues Change Impressions of Human--Robot Touch Interaction? International Journal of Social Robotics (2017), 1--11.

[18]

Laura Hoffmann . 2017. That Robot Touch that Means so Much: On the Psychological Effects of Human-Robot Touch. Ph.D. Dissertation. bibinfoschoolUniversity of Duisburg-Essen, Germany.

[19]

Robert A Josephs, Hazel R Markus, and Romin W Tafarodi . 1992. Gender and self-esteem. Journal of personality and social psychology, Vol. 63, 3 (1992), 391.

[20]

Wendy Ju . 2015. The design of implicit interactions. Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics, Vol. 8, 2 (2015), 1--93.

Digital Library

[21]

Dieta Kuchenbrandt, Markus H"aring, Jessica Eichberg, Friederike Eyssel, and Elisabeth André . 2014. Keep an eye on the task! How gender typicality of tasks influence human--robot interactions. International Journal of Social Robotics Vol. 6, 3 (2014), 417--427.

[22]

Dingjun Li, PL Patrick Rau, and Ye Li . 2010. A cross-cultural study: Effect of robot appearance and task. International Journal of Social Robotics Vol. 2, 2 (2010), 175--186.

[23]

Jamy Li, Wendy Ju, and Byron Reeves . 2016. Touching a mechanical body: tactile contact with intimate parts of a humanoid robot is physiologically arousing. In 66th Annual Conference of the International Communication Association. Fukuoka, Japan.

[24]

James C McCroskey and Thomas A McCain . 1974. The measurement of interpersonal attraction. (1974).

[25]

Kayako Nakagawa, Masahiro Shiomi, Kazuhiko Shinozawa, Reo Matsumura, Hiroshi Ishiguro, and Norihiro Hagita . 2011. Effect of robot's active touch on people's motivation Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Human-robot interaction. ACM, 465--472.

Digital Library

[26]

Jiaqi Nie, Michelle Park, Angie Lorena Marin, and S Shyam Sundar . 2012. Can you hold my hand? Physical warmth in human-robot interaction Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 2012 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 201--202.

Digital Library

[27]

KV Petrides and Adrian Furnham . 2000. Gender differences in measured and self-estimated trait emotional intelligence. Sex roles, Vol. 42, 5 (2000), 449--461.

[28]

Kathleen Richardson . 2016. The asymmetrical'relationship': parallels between prostitution and the development of sex robots. ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society Vol. 45, 3 (2016), 290--293.

Digital Library

[29]

Virginia P Richmond and James C McCroskey . 2000. The impact of supervisor and subordinate immediacy on relational and organizational outcomes. Communications Monographs Vol. 67, 1 (2000), 85--95.

[30]

Paul Schermerhorn, Matthias Scheutz, and Charles R Crowell . 2008. Robot social presence and gender: Do females view robots differently than males? Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction. ACM, 263--270.

Digital Library

[31]

Matthias Scheutz and Thomas Arnold . 2016. Are we ready for sex robots?. In The Eleventh ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction. IEEE Press, 351--358.

Digital Library

[32]

Masahiro Shiomi, Kayako Nakagawa, Kazuhiko Shinozawa, Reo Matsumura, Hiroshi Ishiguro, and Norihiro Hagita . 2017. Does A Robot's Touch Encourage Human Effort? International Journal of Social Robotics Vol. 9, 1 (2017), 5--15.

[33]

Neil Stewart, Jesse Chandler, and Gabriele Paolacci . 2017. Crowdsourcing Samples in Cognitive Science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences (2017).

[34]

Deborah S Stier and Judith A Hall . 1984. Gender differences in touch: An empirical and theoretical review. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 47, 2 (1984), 440.

[35]

Megan Strait, Priscilla Briggs, and Matthias Scheutz . 2015. Gender, more so than Age, Modulates Positive Perceptions of Language-Based Human-Robot Interactions. In 4th international symposium on new frontiers in human robot interaction.

[36]

Juulia T Suvilehto, Enrico Glerean, Robin IM Dunbar, Riitta Hari, and Lauri Nummenmaa . 2015. Topography of social touching depends on emotional bonds between humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 112, 45 (2015), 13811--13816.

[37]

Chantal Triscoli, Håkan Olausson, Uta Sailer, Hanna Ignell, and Ilona Croy . 2013. CT-optimized skin stroking delivered by hand or robot is comparable. Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience Vol. 7 (2013).

[38]

Jan BF Van Erp and Alexander Toet . 2013. How to touch humans: Guidelines for social agents and robots that can touch Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII), 2013 Humaine Association Conference on. IEEE, 780--785.

Digital Library

[39]

Kazuyoshi Wada and Takanori Shibata . 2007. Living with seal robots-its sociopsychological and physiological influences on the elderly at a care house. IEEE Transactions on Robotics Vol. 23, 5 (2007), 972--980.

Digital Library

[40]

Ryan Walker and Christoph Bartneck . 2013. The pleasure of receiving a head massage from a robot RO-MAN, 2013 IEEE. IEEE, 807--813.

[41]

Andrea Webb and Joann Peck . 2015. Individual differences in interpersonal touch: On the development, validation, and use of the "comfort with interpersonal touch"(CIT) scale. Journal of consumer psychology Vol. 25, 1 (2015), 60--77.

[42]

Steve Yohanan and Karon E MacLean . 2012. The role of affective touch in human-robot interaction: Human intent and expectations in touching the haptic creature. International Journal of Social Robotics Vol. 4, 2 (2012), 163--180.

Cited By

Buono RNygren MBianchi-Berthouze N(2025)Touch, communication and affect: a systematic review on the use of touch in healthcare professionsSystematic Reviews10.1186/s13643-025-02769-414:1Online publication date: 14-Feb-2025
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-025-02769-4
Paterson M(2025)Affective Touching10.1017/9781009484404Online publication date: 20-Feb-2025
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009484404
Seifi HBhatia AHornbæk K(2024)Charting User Experience in Physical Human–Robot InteractionACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/365905813:2(1-29)Online publication date: 28-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3659058
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Observing Robot Touch in Context: How Does Touch and Attitude Affect Perceptions of a Robot's Social Qualities?
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)
    1. HCI design and evaluation methods
      1. Laboratory experiments

Recommendations

Communication Cues in a Human-Robot Touch Interaction
HAI '16: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Human Agent Interaction

Haptic interaction is a key capability for social robots that closely interact with people in daily environments. Such human communication cues as gaze behaviors make haptic interaction look natural. Since the purpose of this study is to increase human-...
Touch from Robots Loses to Chatting via Text: A Comparative Study of Sympathy Demonstrated Using Text, Robot Arm, and Qoobo
HRI '24: Companion of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction

Social touch is helpful for improving social connection, and it is one potential method to improve online communication with people at a distance. Although prior work examined if social touch from robot is effective for communicating sympathy compared to ...
Showing Sympathy via Embodied Affective Robot Touch, GIFs, and Texts: People are Indifferent
HRI '23: Companion of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction

Social touch is important for improving social connection, and it is one method that may improve online communication with people at a distance. In the study, we examined the use of social touch from a robot to convey sympathy, in comparison to merely ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

HRI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction

February 2018

468 pages

ISBN:9781450349536

DOI:10.1145/3171221

General Chairs:
Takayuki Kanda
ATR, Japan
,
Selma Ŝabanović
Indiana University Bloomington, USA
,
Program Chairs:
Guy Hoffman
Cornell University, USA
,
Adriana Tapus
ENSTA-ParisTech, France

Copyright © 2018 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

SIGAI: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
IEEE-RAS: Robotics and Automation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 26 February 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Funding Sources

Office of Naval Research

Conference

HRI '18

Sponsor:

SIGAI
SIGCHI
IEEE-RAS

HRI '18: ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction

March 5 - 8, 2018

IL, Chicago, USA

Acceptance Rates

HRI '18 Paper Acceptance Rate 49 of 206 submissions, 24%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 268 of 1,124 submissions, 24%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

36
Total Citations
View Citations
932
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)162
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)19

Reflects downloads up to 03 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Buono RNygren MBianchi-Berthouze N(2025)Touch, communication and affect: a systematic review on the use of touch in healthcare professionsSystematic Reviews10.1186/s13643-025-02769-414:1Online publication date: 14-Feb-2025
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-025-02769-4
Paterson M(2025)Affective Touching10.1017/9781009484404Online publication date: 20-Feb-2025
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009484404
Seifi HBhatia AHornbæk K(2024)Charting User Experience in Physical Human–Robot InteractionACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/365905813:2(1-29)Online publication date: 28-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3659058
De Cet MCvajner MTorre IObaid M(2024)Do Your Expectations Match? A Mixed-Methods Study on the Association Between a Robot's Voice and AppearanceProceedings of the 6th ACM Conference on Conversational User Interfaces10.1145/3640794.3665551(1-11)Online publication date: 8-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3640794.3665551
Claure HCandon KClark OVázquez MGrollman DBroadbent EJu WSoh HWilliams T(2024)Multiplayer Space Invaders: A Platform for Studying Evolving Fairness Perceptions in Human-Robot InteractionCompanion of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610978.3640687(347-350)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3610978.3640687
Valori IFan YJung MFairhurst M(2024)Propensity to trust shapes perceptions of comforting touch between trustworthy human and robot partnersScientific Reports10.1038/s41598-024-57582-114:1Online publication date: 21-Mar-2024
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-57582-1
Valori IJung MFairhurst M(2024)Social touch to build trustComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2023.108121153:COnline publication date: 12-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.chb.2023.108121
Gujran SJung M(2023)Multimodal prompts effectively elicit robot-initiated social touch interactionsCompanion Publication of the 25th International Conference on Multimodal Interaction10.1145/3610661.3617642(159-163)Online publication date: 9-Oct-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3610661.3617642
Winkle KLagerstedt ETorre IOffenwanger A(2023)15 Years of (Who)man Robot Interaction: Reviewing the H in Human-Robot InteractionACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/357171812:3(1-28)Online publication date: 14-Apr-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3571718
Wilson-Small NGoedicke DPetersen KAzenkot SCastellano GRiek LCakmak MLeite I(2023)A Drone TeacherProceedings of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3568162.3576985(311-320)Online publication date: 13-Mar-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3568162.3576985
Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

Figures

Tables

Media

View Table of Conten