skip to main content
10.1145/3173574.3173961acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Honorable Mention

ConceptScape: Collaborative Concept Mapping for Video Learning

Authors Info & Claims
Published:21 April 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

While video has become a widely adopted medium for online learning, existing video players provide limited support for navigation and learning. It is difficult to locate parts of the video that are linked to specific concepts. Also, most video players afford passive watching, thus making it difficult for learners with limited metacognitive skills to deeply engage with the content and reflect on their understanding. To support concept-driven navigation and comprehension of lecture videos, we present ConceptScape, a system that generates and presents a concept map for lecture videos. ConceptScape engages crowd workers to collaboratively generate a concept map by prompting them to externalize reflections on the video. We present two studies to show that (1) interactive concept maps can be useful tools for concept-based video navigation and comprehension, and (2) with ConceptScape, novice crowd workers can collaboratively generate complex concept maps that match the quality of those by experts.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

pn3331-file5.mp4

mp4

4.5 MB

References

  1. MeaningCloud: Text Analyze API. https://www.meaningcloud.com/developer/apis. (Accessed Aug. 2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Mohamed Ally. 2004. Foundations of educational theory for online learning. Theory and practice of online learning 2 (2004), 15--44.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Michael S Bernstein, Greg Little, Robert C Miller, Bj¨ orn Hartmann, Mark S Ackerman, David R Karger, David Crowell, and Katrina Panovich. 2015. Soylent: a word processor with a crowd inside. Commun. ACM 58, 8 (2015), 85--94. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. K.E. Chang, Y.T. Sung, and S.F. Chen. 2001. Learning through computer-based concept mapping with scaffolding aid. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 17, 1 (2001), 21--33.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Konstantinos Chorianopoulos and Michail N Giannakos. 2013. Usability design for video lectures. In Proceedings of the 11th european conference on Interactive TV and video. ACM, 163--164. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. D Randy Garrison and Martha Cleveland-Innes. 2005. Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: Interaction is not enough. The American journal of distance education 19, 3 (2005), 133--148.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Michail N. Giannakos, Konstantinos Chorianopoulos, Marco Ronchetti, Peter Szegedi, and Stephanie D. Teasley. 2013. Analytics on Video-based Learning. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 283--284. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Elena L. Glassman, Aaron Lin, Carrie J. Cai, and Robert C. Miller. 2016. Learnersourcing Personalized Hints. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1626--1636. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Katsuhiro Ikeda, Kozo Sugiyama, Isamu Watanabe, and Kazuo Misue. 2006. Generation of Relevance Maps and Navigation in a Digital Book. In Proceedings of the 2006 Asia-Pacific Symposium on Information Visualisation Volume 60 (APVis '06). Australian Computer Society, Inc., Darlinghurst, Australia, Australia, 49--58. http: //dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1151903.1151911 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Heather Kanuka and Terry Anderson. 2007. Online social interchange, discord, and knowledge construction. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education 13, 1 (2007), 57--74.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Juho Kim. 2013. Toolscape: enhancing the learning experience of how-to videos. In CHI'13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2707--2712. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Juho Kim, Elena L. Glassman, Andr´ es Monroy-Hern´ andez, and Meredith Ringel Morris. 2015. RIMES: Embedding Interactive Multimedia Exercises in Lecture Videos. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1535--1544. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Juho Kim, Philip J. Guo, Carrie J. Cai, Shang-Wen (Daniel) Li, Krzysztof Z. Gajos, and Robert C. Miller. 2014a. Data-driven Interaction Techniques for Improving Navigation of Educational Videos. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 563--572. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Juho Kim, Phu Tran Nguyen, Sarah Weir, Philip J Guo, Robert C Miller, and Krzysztof Z Gajos. 2014b. Crowdsourcing step-by-step information extraction to enhance existing how-to videos. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 4017--4026. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Geza Kovacs. 2016. Effects of In-Video Quizzes on MOOC Lecture Viewing. In Proceedings of the Third (2016) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale (L@S '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 31--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. So Young Kwon and Lauren Cifuentes. 2009. The comparative effect of individually-constructed vs. collaboratively-constructed computer-based concept maps. Computers & Education 52, 2 (2009), 365--375. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Justin Matejka, Tovi Grossman, and George Fitzmaurice. 2013. Swifter: Improved Online Video Scrubbing. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1159--1168. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. John R McClure, Brian Sonak, and Hoi K Suen. 1999. Concept map assessment of classroom learning: Reliability, validity, and logistical practicality. Journal of research in science teaching 36, 4 (1999), 475--492.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Toni-Jan Keith Palma Monserrat, Shengdong Zhao, Kevin McGee, and Anshul Vikram Pandey. 2013. NoteVideo: Facilitating Navigation of Blackboard-style Lecture Videos. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1139--1148. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Joseph D Novak and Alberto J Cañ nas. 2008. The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct and use them. (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Roni Reingold, Rikki Rimor, and Anat Kalay. 2008. Instructor's scaffolding in support of student's metacognition through a teacher education online course: a case study. Journal of interactive online learning 7, 2 (2008), 139--151.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Wolff-Michael Roth and Anita Roychoudhury. 1993. The concept map as a tool for the collaborative construction of knowledge: A microanalysis of high school physics students. Journal of research in science teaching 30, 5 (1993), 503--534.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. M. Schwab, H. Strobelt, J. Tompkin, C. Fredericks, C. Huff, D. Higgins, A. Strezhnev, M. Komisarchik, G. King, and H. Pfister. 2017. booc.io: An Education System with Hierarchical Concept Maps. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics PP, 99 (Jan 2017 2017), 1--1. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Ruey-Shiang Shaw. 2010. A study of learning performance of e-learning materials design with knowledge maps. Computers & Education 54, 1 (2010), 253--264. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Chao Boon Teo and Robert Kheng Leng Gay. 2006. A Knowledge-driven Model to Personalize e-Learning. J. Educ. Resour. Comput. 6, 1, Article 3 (March 2006). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Minhong Wang, Jun Peng, Bo Cheng, Hance Zhou, and Jie Liu. 2011. Knowledge visualization for self-regulated learning. Educational Technology & Society 14, 3 (2011), 28--42.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Sarah Weir, Juho Kim, Krzysztof Z Gajos, and Robert C Miller. 2015. Learnersourcing subgoal labels for how-to videos. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. ACM, 405--416. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Jacob Whitehill and Margo Seltzer. 2017. A Crowdsourcing Approach to Collecting Tutorial Videos--Toward Personalized Learning-at-Scale. In Proceedings of the Fourth (2017) ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale. ACM, 157--160. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Joseph Jay Williams, Juho Kim, Anna Rafferty, Samuel Maldonado, Krzysztof Z. Gajos, Walter S. Lasecki, and Neil Heffernan. 2016. AXIS: Generating Explanations at Scale with Learnersourcing and Machine Learning. In Proceedings of the Third (2016) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale (L@S '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 379--388. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Han Zhang. 2017. Smart Jump: Automated Navigation Suggestion for Videos in MOOCs. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion (WWW '17 Companion). International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland, 1183--1184. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Barry J Zimmerman and Dale H Schunk. 2001. Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Krunoslav Zubrinic, Damir Kalpic, and Mario Milicevic. 2012. The automatic creation of concept maps from documents written using morphologically rich languages. Expert systems with applications 39, 16 (2012), 12709--12718. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. ConceptScape: Collaborative Concept Mapping for Video Learning

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2018
      8489 pages
      ISBN:9781450356206
      DOI:10.1145/3173574

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 21 April 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '18 Paper Acceptance Rate666of2,590submissions,26%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader