skip to main content
10.1145/3173574.3174210acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Honorable Mention

Complex Mediation in the Formation of Political Opinions

Published:21 April 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

The Internet plays an important role in the formation of political opinions by supporting citizens in discovering diverse political information and opinions. However, the echo chamber effect has become of increasing concern, referring to the tendency for people to encounter opinions and information similar to their own online. It remains poorly understood how ordinary citizens use the Internet in the formation of political opinions. To answer this question, we conducted an interview study with 32 Chinese citizens. We found that participants used complex strategies to coordinate personal networks and technologies in specific ways to better understand political events. To analyze this phenomenon, we draw on Bødker and Andersen's model of complex mediation which describes how multiple mediators including people and artifacts work together to mediate an activity. We discuss how complex mediation supported participants in informing their political opinions. We derive design implications for supporting people to form political opinions.

References

  1. Lada A. Adamic and Natalie Glance. 2005. The political blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. election. Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on Link discovery - LinkKDD '05, ACM Press, 36--43. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Roya Akhavan-Majid. 2004. Mass Media Reform in China: Toward a New Analytical Framework. International Communication Gazette 66, 6: 553--565.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Ashley Lutz. 2012. These 6 Corporations Control 90% Of The Media In America. Business Insider. Retrieved from http://www.businessinsider.com/these-6corporations-control-90-of-the-media-in-america-2012-Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Eytan Bakshy, Solomon Messing, and Lada A. Adamic. 2015. Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science 348, 6239: 1130--1132.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Eytan Bakshy, Itamar Rosenn, Cameron Marlow, and Lada Adamic. 2012. The role of social networks in information diffusion. Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web WWW '12, ACM Press, 519--528. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Jeffrey Bardzell and Shaowen Bardzell. 2013. What is "critical" about critical design? Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '13, ACM Press, 3297--3306. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Jiao Bei. 2013. How Chinese Journalists use Weibo microblogging for investigative reporting. Retrieved from http://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/publication/howchinese-journalists-use-weibo-microblogginginvestigative-reportingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Yochai Benkler, Hal Roberts, Robert Faris, Alicia Solow-Niederman, and Bruce Etling. 2013. Social Mobilization and the Networked Public Sphere: Mapping the SOPA-PIPA Debate. SSRN Electronic Journal.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Bruce Bimber. 2000. The Study of Information Technology and Civic Engagement. Political Communication 17, 4: 329--333.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Susanne Bødker. 1996. Applying activity theory to video analysis: how to make sense of video data in human-computer interaction. In Context and consciousness: activity theory and human-computer interactiond consciousness. MIT Press, 147--174. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Susanne Bødker and Peter Bøgh Andersen. 2005. Complex Mediation. Human-Computer Interaction 20: 353--402. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 2: 77--101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Mike Budd, Steve Craig, and Clayton M. Steinman. 1999. Consuming Environments: Television and Commercial Culture. Rutgers University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Jörg Cassens. 2005. User Aspects of Explanation Aware CBR Systems. IFIP Conference on HumanComputer Interaction - INTERACT 2005, 1087--1090. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. CERN. 2001. Evolution of Internet in China. Retrieved from http://www.edu.cn/introduction_1378/20060323/t2006 0323_4285.shtmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Andrew. Chadwick. 2017. The hybrid media system: politics and power. Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Thomas Chase. 2012. An internet-mediated political public sphere in China and South Korea.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Cindy Chiu, Davis Lin, and Ari Silverman. 2012. China's social media boom.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Munmun De Choudhury, Andrés Monroy-Hernández, and Gloria Mark. 2014. "Narco" emotions: affect and desensitization in social media during the mexican drug war. Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '14, ACM Press, 3563--3572. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Torkil Clemmensen, Victor Kaptelinin, and Bonnie Nardi. 2016. Making HCI theory work: an analysis of the use of activity theory in HCI research. Behaviour & Information Technology 35, 8: 608--627. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. CNNIC. 2015. The 35th China Internet Development Statistics Report. Retrieved from https://www.cnnic.net.cn/hlwfzyj/hlwxzbg/hlwtjbg/201 502/t20150203_51634.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Elanor Colleoni, Alessandro Rozza, and Adam Arvidsson. 2014. Echo Chamber or Public Sphere? Predicting Political Orientation and Measuring Political Homophily in Twitter Using Big Data. Journal of Communication 64, 2: 317--332.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Kelley Cotter, Janghee Cho, and Emilee Rader. 2017. Explaining the News Feed Algorithm: An Analysis of the "News Feed FYI" Blog. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI EA '17, ACM Press, 1553--1560. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Nick Couldry and James Curran. 2003. Contesting media power: alternative media in a networked world. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Clara Crivellaro, Rob Comber, John Bowers, Peter C. Wright, and Patrick Olivier. 2014. A pool of dreams: facebook, politics and the emergence of a social movement. Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems CHI '14, ACM Press, 3573--3582. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Lincoln Dahlberg. 2001. The Internet and Democratic Discourse: Exploring The Prospects of Online Deliberative Forums Extending the Public Sphere. Information, Communication & Society 4, 4: 615--633.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Peter Dahlgren. 2002. In Search of the Talkative Public: Media, Deliberative Democracy and Civic Culture. Javnost - The Public 9, 3: 5--25.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Peter Dahlgren. 2005. The Internet, Public Spheres, and Political Communication: Dispersion and Deliberation. Political Communication 22, 2: 147--162.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Kevin M. DeLuca, Sean Lawson, and Ye Sun. 2012. Occupy Wall Street on the Public Screens of Social Media: The Many Framings of the Birth of a Protest Movement. Communication, Culture & Critique 5, 4: 483--509.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Ganlin Ding. 2002.(China Press Development). Higher Education Press, Beijing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Abraham Doris-Down, Husayn Versee, and Eric Gilbert. 2013. Political blend: an application designed to bring people together based on political differences. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Communities and Technologies - C&T '13, ACM Press, 120--130. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Sara Douglas, Roxanne B. Raine, Misa Maruyama, Bryan Semaan, and Scott P. Robertson. 2015. Community matters: How young adults use Facebook to evaluate political candidates. Information Polity 20, 2,3: 135--150.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Hamid Ekbia and Bonnie Nardi. 2016. Social Inequality and HCI: The View from Political Economy. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '16, ACM Press, 4997--5002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Hamid Ekbia and Bonnie Nardi. 2017. Heteromation, and Other Stories of Computing and Capitalism. MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Mostafa M. El-Bermaway. 2016. Your Echo Chamber is Destroying Democracy. Wired Magazine. Retrieved from https://www.wired.com/2016/11/filter-bubbledestroying-democracy/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Robert Entman. 1993. Framing Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication 43, 4: 51--58.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Robert Entman. 2007. Framing Bias: Media in the Distribution of Power. Journal of Communication 57, 1: 163--173.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Motahhare Eslami, Karrie Karahalios, Christian Sandvig, et al. 2016. First I "like" it, then I hide it: Folk Theories of Social Feeds. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '16, ACM Press, 2371--2382. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Hanqi Fang. 2002. China Journalism and Communication History). Renmin University of China Press, Beijing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Marcus Franda. 2002. Launching into Cyberspace: Internet Development and Politics in Five World Regions. Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc., Boulder. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. R. Kelly Garrett. 2009. Echo chambers online?: Politically motivated selective exposure among Internet news users. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 14, 2: 265--285.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. R. Kelly Garrett. 2009. Politically Motivated Reinforcement Seeking: Reframing the Selective Exposure Debate. Journal of Communication 59, 4: 676--699.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Margo Gee. 1985. The 1980 Olympic boycott: media bias in Canada and Great Britain. The 1980 Olympic boycott: media bias in Canada and Great Britain.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Eric Gilbert, Tony Bergstrom, and Karrie Karahalios. 2009. Blogs are Echo Chambers: Blogs are Echo Chambers. 2009 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE, 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Jennifer Golbeck and Derek Hansen. 2011. Computing political preference among twitter followers. Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '11, ACM Press, 1105--1108. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Merle Goldman. 1994. The Role of The Press In PostMao Political Struggles. In China's Media, Media's China, Chin-Chuan Lee (ed.). Westview Press, Inc., Boulder, Colorado, 23--35.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Catherine Grevet, Loren G. Terveen, and Eric Gilbert. 2014. Managing political differences in social media. Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing CSCW '14, ACM Press, 1400--1408. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Marlowe Hood. 1994. the Use and Abuse of Mass Media by Chinese Leaders During the 1980s. In China's Media, Media's China, Chin-Chuan Lee (ed.). Westview Press, Inc., Boulder, Colorado, 37--57.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Christopher Hooton. 2016. Social media echo chambers gifted Donald Trump the presidency. the Independent. Retrieved from http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/donald-trumppresident-social-media-echo-chamberhypernormalisation-adam-curtis-protests-blamea7409481.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Robert Huckfeldt and John Sprague. 1987. Networks in Context: The Social Flow of Political Information. The American Political Science Review 81, 4: 1197--1216.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Victor Kaptelinin. 1996. Activity Theory: Implications for Human-Computer Interaction. In Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-computer Interaction. MIT Press, 103--116. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Victor Kaptelinin and Bonnie A. Nardi. 2006. Acting with Technology: Activity Theory and Interaction Design. The MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Lu Keng. 1994. Press Control in "New China" and "Old China." In China's Media, Media's China, ChinChuan Lee (ed.). Westview Press, Inc., Boulder, Colorado, 147--161.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Valdimer Orlando Key and Milton C. Cummings. 1966. The responsible electorate: rationality in presidential voting, 1936--1960, Volume 1966. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Gary King, Jennifer Pan, and Margaret Roberts. 2013. How Censorship in China Allows Government Criticism but Silences Collective Expression. American Political Science Review 107, 2: 326--343.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Yubo Kou, Yong Ming Kow, and Xinning Gui. 2017. Resisting the Censorship Infrastructure in China. 2017 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2332--2340.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Yubo Kou, Yong Ming Kow, Xinning Gui, and Waikuen Cheng. 2017. One Social Movement, Two Social Media Sites: A Comparative Study of Public Discourses. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 26, 4--6: 807--836. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Yubo Kou, Bryan Semaan, and Bonnie Nardi. 2017. A Confucian Look at Internet Censorship in China. IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction INTERACT 2017, Springer, Cham, 377--398.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Yong Ming Kow, Yubo Kou, Bryan Semaan, and Waikuen Cheng. 2016. Mediating the Undercurrents: Using Social Media to Sustain a Social Movement. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '16, ACM Press, 3883--3894. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Juhi Kulshrestha, Motahhare Eslami, Johnnatan Messias, et al. 2017. Quantifying Search Bias: Investigating Sources of Bias for Political Searches in Social Media. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing - CSCW '17, ACM Press, 417-- 432. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Chin-Chuan Lee. 1994. Ambiguities and Contradictions: Issues in China's Changing Political Communication. In China's Media, Media's China, Chin-Chuan Lee (ed.). Westview Press, Inc., Boulder, Colorado, 3--20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Jayeon Lee. 2014. Are Some People Less Influenced by Others' Opinions? The Role of Internal Political Self-Efficacy and Need for Cognition in Impression Formation on Social Networking Sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 17, 9: 571--577.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. Alexei Leont'ev. 1978. Activity, Consciousness, and Personality. Prentice-Hall.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Zhan Li. 2004. Will the Internet Form the Public Sphere in China? Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics 2, 2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Bin Liang and Hong Lu. 2010. Internet Development, Censorship, and Cyber Crimes in China. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice 26, 1: 103--120.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. Helena Lindgren and Ingeborg Nilsson. 2009. Designing Systems for Health Promotion and Autonomy in Older Adults. IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction -- INTERACT 2009, 700--703. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Qing Liu and Barrett McCormick. 2011. The Media and the Public Sphere in Contemporary China. boundary 2 38, 1: 101--134.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Gilad Lotan, Erhardt Graeff, Mike Ananny, Devin Gaffney, Ian Pearce, and danah boyd. 2011. The Arab Spring| The Revolutions Were Tweeted: Information Flows during the 2011 Tunisian and Egyptian Revolutions. International Journal of Communication 5, 31.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. Arthur Lupia. 1994. Shortcuts Versus Encyclopedias: Information and Voting Behavior in California Insurance Reform Elections. American Political Science Review 88, 1: 63--76.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  70. Ringo Ma. 2008. Spread of SARS and War-Related Rumors through New Media in China. Communication Quarterly 56, 4: 376--391.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  71. Rebecca MacKinnon. 2011. China's "Networked Authoritarianism." Journal of Democracy 22, 32--46.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  72. Gloria Mark, Mossaab Bagdouri, Leysia Palen, James Martin, Ban Al-Ani, and Kenneth Anderson. 2012. Blogs as a collective war diary. Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work - CSCW '12, ACM Press, 37--46. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  73. Marshall McLuhan and Lewis H. Lapham. 1994. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. The MIT Press. Retrieved from http://www.amazon.com/dp/0262631598Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. Mary Milliken, Kerri Gibson, and Susan O'Donnell. 2008. User-generated video and the online public sphere: Will YouTube facilitate digital freedom of expression in Atlantic Canada. American Communication Journal 10, 3: 1--14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. Andrés Monroy-Hernández, Danah Boyd, Emre Kiciman, Munmun De Choudhury, and Scott Counts. 2013. The new war correspondents: the rise of civic media curation in urban warfare. Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work - CSCW '13, ACM Press, 1443--1452. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  76. Yi Mou, Kevin Wu, and David Atkin. 2014. Understanding the use of circumvention tools to bypass online censorship. New Media & Society 18, 5: 837-- 856.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  77. Michael J. Muller and Sarah Kuhn. 1993. Participatory design. Communications of the ACM 36, 6: 24--28. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  78. Sean A. Munson and Paul Resnick. 2011. The Prevalence of Political Discourse in Non-Political Blogs. Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. Bonnie A Nardi. 1996. Activity Theory and Humancomputer Interaction. In Context and consciousness: activity theory and human-computer interaction. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  80. Natalie Pang. 2013. Civic Action and Media Perceptions within the Wall: The (Re) Negotiation of Power in China. JeDEM - eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government 5, 1: 1--15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  81. Zizi Papacharissi. 2002. The virtual sphere: The internet as a public sphere. New Media & Society 4, 1: 9--27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  82. Eli Pariser. 2011. The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. Penguin UK. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  83. Nathaniel Poor. 2006. Mechanisms of an Online Public Sphere: The Website Slashdot. Journal of ComputerMediated Communication 10, 2: 00--00.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  84. Bei Qin, David Stromberg, and Yanhui Wu. 2016. Media Bias in China.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  85. Margaret Roberts. 2015. Experiencing Censorship Emboldens Internet Users and Decreases Government Support in China.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  86. Sarita Yardi Schoenebeck. 2014. Giving up Twitter for Lent: how and why we take breaks from social media. Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '14, ACM Press, 773--782. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  87. Bryan Semaan, Heather Faucett, Scott P. Robertson, Misa Maruyama, and Sara Douglas. 2015. Designing Political Deliberation Environments to Support Interactions in the Public Sphere. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '15, ACM Press, 3167--3176. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  88. Bryan Semaan, Scott Robertson, Sara Douglas, and Misa Maruyama. 2014. Social media supporting political deliberation across multiple public spheres: towards depolarization. Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing - CSCW '14, ACM Press, 1409-- 1421. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  89. Maqsood Ahmad Shaheen. 2008. Use of social networks and information seeking behavior of students during political crises in Pakistan: A case study. The International Information & Library Review 40, 3: 142--147.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  90. Clay Shirky. 2011. Political Power of Social Media Technology, the Public Sphere Sphere, and Political Change, The. Foreign Affairs 90.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  91. Olivia Solon. 2016. Facebook's failure: did fake news and polarized politics get Trump elected? the Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/nov/10/ facebook-fake-news-election-conspiracy-theoriesGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  92. Nick Srnicek. Platform capitalism. John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  93. Kate Starbird and Leysia Palen. 2012. (How) will the revolution be retweeted?: information diffusion and the 2011 Egyptian uprising. Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work - CSCW '12, ACM Press, 7--16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  94. Daniela Stockmann and Mary E. Gallagher. 2011. Remote Control: How the Media Sustain Authoritarian Rule in China. Comparative Political Studies 44, 4: 436--467.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  95. Jennifer Stromer-Galley. 2006. Diversity of Political Conversation on the Internet: Users' Perspectives. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 8, 3: 0--0.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  96. Miklos Sukosd and King-wa Fu. 2013. How Chinese Netizens Discuss Environmental Conflicts? Framing and Functions on Sina Weibo. SSRN Electronic Journal.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  97. Cass R. Sunstein. 2009. Republic. Com 2. 0. Princeton University Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  98. Borislav Tadic, Markus Rohde, Volker Wulf, and David Randall. 2016. ICT Use by Prominent Activists in Republika Srpska. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI '16, ACM Press, 3364--3377. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  99. Zixue Tai. 2006. The Internet in China. Cyberspace and Civil Society. Routledge Tayloy & Francis Group, LLC. Retrieved from http://www.taylorandfrancis.com Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  100. Zeynep Tufekci and Christopher Wilson. 2012. Social Media and the Decision to Participate in Political Protest: Observations From Tahrir Square. Journal of Communication 62, 2: 363--379.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  101. Lev Vygotsky. 1978. Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  102. Cara Wallis. 2011. New Media Practices in China: Youth Patterns, Processes, and Politics. International Journal of Communication 5, 31.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  103. Yiran Wang and Gloria Mark. 2013. Trust in Online News: Comparing Social Media and Official Media Use by Chinese Citizens. Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work, ACM, 599--610. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  104. Yiran Wang and Gloria Mark. 2017. Engaging with Political and Social Issues on Facebook in College Life. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing - CSCW '17, ACM Press, 433--445. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  105. Ran Wei and Zhongdang Pan. 1999. Mass Media and Consumerist Values in the People's Republic of China. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 11, 1: 75--96.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  106. Data Center Weibo. 2014. 2014 Weibo User Development Report. Retrieved from http://data.weibo.com/report/reportDetail?id=215Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  107. Mike Westling. 2007. Expanding the Public Sphere: The Impact of Facebook on Political Communication. Society 28, May: 835--860. Retrieved from http://www.thenewvernacular.com/projects/facebook_a nd_political_communication.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  108. Volker Wulf, Konstantin Aal, Ibrahim Abu Kteish, et al. 2013. Fighting against the wall: social media use by political activists in a Palestinian village. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '13, ACM Press, 1979--1988. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  109. Volker Wulf, Kaoru Misaki, Meryem Atam, David Randall, and Markus Rohde. 2013. "On the ground" in Sidi Bouzid: investigating social media use during the tunisian revolution. Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work CSCW '13, ACM Press, 1409--1418. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  110. Sarita Yardi and Danah Boyd. 2010. Dynamic Debates: An Analysis of Group Polarization Over Time on Twitter. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 30, 5: 316--327.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  111. Lee Chyen Yee and Paul Carsten. 2013. China to invest $323 bln to expand broadband to all-minister. Reuters. Retrieved from http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/09/18/chinabroadband-idUSL3N0HE0O720130918Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  112. Haiqing Yu. 2006. From Active Audience to Media Citizenship: The Case of Post-Mao China. Social Semiotics 16, 2: 303--326.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  113. Haiqing Yu. 2007. Talking, Linking, Clicking: The Politics of AIDS and SARS in Urban China. positions: east asia cultures critique 15, 1: 35--63.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  114. X. Zhou. 2009. The political blogosphere in China: A content analysis of the blogs regarding the dismissal of Shanghai leader Chen Liangyu. New Media & Society 11, 6: 1003--1022.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Complex Mediation in the Formation of Political Opinions

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2018
      8489 pages
      ISBN:9781450356206
      DOI:10.1145/3173574

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 21 April 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '18 Paper Acceptance Rate666of2,590submissions,26%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader