skip to main content
10.1145/3173574.3174233acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Let's Play!: Digital and Analog Play between Preschoolers and Parents

Published:21 April 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Play is an enjoyable and developmentally useful part of early childhood, and parent-child play is a highly productive mechanism by which children learn to participate in the world. We conducted an observational lab study to examine how 15 parent-child pairs (children age 4-6) respond to and play with tablet apps as compared to analog toys. We found that parents and children were less likely to engage with each other or to respond to each other's bids for attention during play sessions with tab-lets versus play sessions with toys. We also observed that specific design features of tablet devices and children's apps-such as one-sided interfaces, game paradigms that demand continual attention, and lack of support for parallel interaction-are the primary mechanism shaping these differences. We provide guidance suggesting how children's apps might be re-designed to preserve the ad-vantages of digital play experiences while also evolving to build in the advantages of traditional toys.

References

  1. Zhen Bai, Alan F. Blackwell, and George Coulouris. 2015. Exploring Expressive Augmented Reality. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '15, 1035-- 1044. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Rafael Ballagas, Thérèse E. Dugan, Glenda Revelle, Koichi Mori, Maria Sandberg, Janet Go, Emily Reardon, and Mirjana Spasojevic. 2013. Electric agents: fostering sibling joint media engagement through interactive television and augmented reality. Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work: 225--236. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Rachel Barr. 2013. Memory Constraints on Infant Learning From Picture Books, Television, and Touchscreens. Child Development Perspectives 7, 4: 205--210.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Laura E Berk and Adam Winsler. 1995. Scaffolding Children's Learning: Vygotsky and Early Childhood Education. NAEYC Research into Practice Series. Volume 7. ERIC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Maryjane Blasi, Sally C. Hurwitz, and Sally C. Hurwitz. 2012. For Parents Particularly: To Be Successful-Let Them Play!Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Mindy Brooks, Ashley Fenwick-Naditch, and Erica Branch-Ridley. 2011. Electric Racer: An intergenerational gaming experience designed to promote literacy. The New Coviewing: Designing for Learning through Joint Media: 30--33.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Benjamin Burroughs. 2017. YouTube Kids: The App Economy and Mobile Parenting. Social Media + Society 3, 2: 205630511770718.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Drew Cingel and Anne Marie Piper. 2017. How Parents Engage Children in Tablet-Based Reading Experiences. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing - CSCW '17, 505--510. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Maayan Cohen, Kody R. Dillman, Haley MacLeod, Seth Hunter, Anthony Tang, Maayan Cohen, Kody R. Dillman, Haley MacLeod, Seth Hunter, and Anthony Tang. 2014. OneSpace. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '14, 2177--2180. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Juliet Corbin and Anselm Strauss. 2008. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Allison DiBianca Fasoli. 2014. To Play or Not to Play: Diverse Motives for Latino and Euro-American ParentChild Play in a Children's Museum. Infant and Child Development 23, 6: 605--621.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Ralph J Erickson. 1985. Play contributes to the full emotional development of the child. Education 105, 3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Doris Pronin Fromberg and Doris Bergen. 2006. Play from birth to twelve: Contexts, perspectives, and meanings. Taylor & Francis.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Frances Gardner. 2000. Methodological Issues in the Direct Observation of Parent-Child Interaction: Do Observational Findings Reflect the Natural Behavior of Participants? Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review 3, 3: 185--198.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Kenneth R Ginsburg. 2007. The importance of play in promoting healthy child development and maintaining strong parent-hild bonds. Pediatrics 119, 1: 182--191.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Alexis Hiniker, Hyewon Suh, Sabina Cao, and Julie A. Kientz. 2016. Screen time tantrums: how families manage screen media experiences for young children. In CHI 2016, 648--660. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Carollee Howes and Catherine C. Matheson. 1992. Sequences in the development of competent play with peers: Social and social pretend play. Developmental Psychology 28, 5: 961--974.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Susan M. Hoyle. 1994. Children's use of discourse markers in the creation of imaginary participation frameworks. Discourse Processes 17, 3: 447--464.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Seth E Hunter, Pattie Maes, Anthony Tang, Kori M Inkpen, and Susan M Hessey. 2014. WaaZam!: supporting creative play at a distance in customized video environments. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems, 1197--1206. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Marina Krcmar and Drew P. Cingel. 2014. Parent-Child Joint Reading in Traditional and Electronic Formats. Media Psychology 17, 3: 262--281.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Alexis R. Lauricella, Rachel Barr, and Sandra L. Calvert. 2014. Parent-child interactions during traditional and computer storybook reading for children's comprehension: Implications for electronic storybook design. International Journal of ChildComputer Interaction 2, 1: 17--25. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Eric W. Lindsey and Jacquelyn Mize. 2000. ParentChild Physical and Pretense Play: Links to Children' Social Competence. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 46, 565-- 591.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Deborah L. Linebarger, Rachel Barr, Matthew A. Lapierre, and Jessica T. Piotrowski. 2014. Associations Between Parenting, Media Use, Cumulative Risk, and Children's Executive Functioning. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics 35, 6: 367--377.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Sonia Livingstone and Ellen J. Helsper. 2008. Parental Mediation of Children's Internet Use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 52, 4: 581--599.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Shannon Lockhart. 2010. Play: An important tool for cognitive development. Extensions Curriculum Newsletter from HighScope 24, 3: 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Kevin B MacDonald. 1993. Parent-child play: Descriptions and implications. SUNY Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Kevin MacDonald and Ross D. Parke. 1984. Bridging the Gap: Parent-Child Play Interaction and Peer Interactive Competence. Child Development 55, 4: 1265.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Melissa Mazmanian and Simone Lanette. 2017. "Okay, One More Episode" In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing - CSCW '17, 2273--2286. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Jennifer L. Miller, Amanda Lossia, Catalina SuarezRivera, and Julie Gros-Louis. 2017. Toys that squeak: Toy type impacts quality and quantity of parent-child interactions. First Language 37, 6: 630--647.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Julia Parish-Morris, Neha Mahajan, Kathy Hirsh-Pasek, Roberta Michnick Golinkoff, and Molly Fuller Collins. 2013. Once upon a time: Parent-child dialogue and storybook reading in the electronic era. Mind, Brain, and Education 7, 3: 200--211.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Thomas G. Power. 1995. Parent-child Play: Evolutionary and Cultural Perspectives. Psyccritiques 40, 2: 149--151.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Jenny S. Radesky, Elizabeth Peacock-Chambers, Barry Zuckerman, and Michael Silverstein. 2016. Use of Mobile Technology to Calm Upset Children. JAMA Pediatrics 170, 4: 397.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Hayes Raffle, Mirjana Spasojevic, Rafael Ballagas, Glenda Revelle, Hiroshi Horii, Sean Follmer, Janet Go, Emily Reardon, Koichi Mori, and Joseph Kaye. 2010. Family story play. In Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '10, 1583.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Eric E Rasmussen, Autumn Shafer, Malinda J. Colwell, Shawna White, Narissra Punyanunt-Carter, Rebecca L. Densley, and Holly Wright. 2016. Relation between active mediation, exposure to Daniel Tiger's Neighborhood, and US preschoolers' social and emotional development. Journal of Children and Media 10, 4: 443--461.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Victoria Rideout. 2014. Learning at Home: Families' Educational Media Use in America. Joan Ganz Cooney Center. Retrieved September 19, 2017 from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED555586Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Kimiko Ryokai, Hayes Raffle, and Robert Kowalski. 2012. Storyfaces: Pretend-play with ebooks to support social-emotional storytelling. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, 125--133. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Herman Saksono, Ashwini Ranade, Geeta Kamarthi, Carmen Castaneda-Sceppa, Jessica A. Hoffman, Cathy Wirth, and Andrea G. Parker. 2015. Spaceship Launch: Designing a Collaborative Exergame for Families. Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing: 1776--1787. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Gavriel Salomon. 1977. Effects of Encouraging Israeli Mothers to Co-Observe "Sesame Street" with Their Five-Year-Olds. Child Development 48, 3: 1146.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Kiley Sobel, Arpita Bhattacharya, Alexis Hiniker, Jin Ha Lee, Julie A. Kientz, and Jason C. Yip. 2017. It was't really about the Pokémon. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '17, 1483--1496. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Anna V. Sosa. 2016. Association of the Type of Toy Used During Play With the Quantity and Quality of Parent-Infant Communication. JAMA Pediatrics 170, 2: 132.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Reed Stevens and William R Penuel. 2010. Studying and fostering learning through joint media engagement. In Principal Investigators Meeting of the National Science Foundation's Science of Learning Centers, October, Arlington, VA, 1--75.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Lori Takeuchi, Reed Stevens, and others. 2011. The new coviewing: Designing for learning through joint media engagement. In New York, NY: The Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda, Jacqueline D. Shannon, Natasha J. Cabrera, and Michael E. Lamb. 2004. Fathers and mothers at play with their 2- and 3-year-olds: Contributions to language and cognitive development. Child Development 75, 6: 1806--1820.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Elizabeth A Vandewater, David S Bickham, and June H Lee. 2006. Time well spent? Relating television use to children's free-time activities. Pediatrics 117, 2: e18191.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Amy Voida and Saul Greenberg. 2009. Wii all play: the console game as a computational meeting place. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: 1559--1568. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Svetlana Yarosh. 2008. Supporting parent-child interaction in divorced families. Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Interaction design and children: 33--36. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Svetlana Yarosh, Anthony Tang, Sanika Mokashi, and Gregory D. Abowd. 2013. almost touching: parent-child remote communication using the sharetable system. Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work: 181--192. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Lise M. Youngblade and Judy Dunn. 1995. Individual Differences in Young Children's Pretend Play with Mother and Sibling: Links to Relationships and Understanding of Other People's Feelings and Beliefs. Child Development 66, 5: 1472--1492.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Nicola Yuill and Alex F Martin. 2016. Curling Up With a Good E-Book: Mother-Child Shared Story Reading on Screen or Paper Affects Embodied Interaction and Warmth. Frontiers in psychology 7: 1951.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Good Toys for Young Children by Age and Stage. National Association for the Education of Young Children. Retrieved from https://www.naeyc.org/toysGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. 1989. Convention on the Rights of the Child. General Assembly Resolution 44/25 of 20. Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. Retrieved June 22, 2006 from www.unhchr.ch/html/menu3/b/k2crc.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Let's Play!: Digital and Analog Play between Preschoolers and Parents

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2018
      8489 pages
      ISBN:9781450356206
      DOI:10.1145/3173574

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 21 April 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '18 Paper Acceptance Rate666of2,590submissions,26%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader