ABSTRACT
Popular messaging platforms such as Slack have given rise to hundreds of chatbots that users can engage with individually or as a group. We present a Wizard of Oz study on the use of searchbots (i.e., chatbots that perform specific types of searches) during collaborative information-seeking tasks. Specifically, we study searchbots that intervene dynamically and compare between two intervention types: (1) the searchbot presents questions to users to gather the information it needs to produce results, and (2) the searchbot monitors the conversation among the collaborators, infers the necessary information, and then displays search results with no additional input from the users. We investigate three research questions: (RQ1) What is the effect of a searchbot (and its intervention type) on participants» collaborative experience' (RQ2) What is the effect of a searchbot»s intervention type on participants» perceptions about the searchbot and level of engagement with the searchbot' and (RQ3) What are participants» impressions of a dynamic searchbot? Our results suggest that dynamic searchbots can enhance users» collaborative experience and that the intervention type does not greatly affect users» perceptions and level of engagement. Participants» impressions of the searchbot suggest unique opportunities and challenges for future work.
- Piotr D. Adamczyk and Brian P. Bailey . 2004. If Not Now, when?: The Effects of Interruption at Different Moments Within Task Execution CHI. ACM, 271--278. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Brian P. Bailey and Joseph A. Konstan . 2006. On the need for attention-aware systems: Measuring effects of interruption on task performance, error rate, and affective state. Computers in Human Behavior Vol. 22, 4 (2006), 685--708.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Robert Capra, Jaime Arguello, Anita Crescenzi, and Emily Vardell . 2015. Differences in the Use of Search Assistance for Tasks of Varying Complexity SIGIR. ACM, 23--32. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Robert Capra, Annie Chen, Katie Hawthorne, Jaime Arguello, Lee Shaw, and Gary Marchionini . 2012. Design and Evaluation of a System to Support Collaborative Search ASIST. Wiley.Google Scholar
- Robert Capra, Gary Marchionini, Javier Velasco-Martin, and Katrina Muller . 2010. Tools-at-hand and Learning in Multi-session, Collaborative Search CHI. ACM, 951--960. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Robert Capra, Javier Velasco-Martin, and Beth Sams . 2011. Collaborative Information Seeking by the Numbers. Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Collaborative Information Retrieval. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mary Czerwinski, Ed Cutrell, and Eric Horvitz . 2000. Instant Messaging: Effects of Relevance and Timing HCI, Vol. Vol. 2. 71--76.Google Scholar
- Garett Dworman and Stephanie Rosenbaum . 2004. Helping Users to Use Help: Improving Interaction with Help Systems CHI. ACM, 1717--1718. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Miles Efron and Megan Winget . 2010. Questions are content: A taxonomy of questions in a microblogging environment. ASIST, Vol. 47, 1 (2010), 1--10. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lia Emanuel, Joel Fischer, Wendy Ju, and Saiph Savage . 2016. Innovations in Autonomous Systems: Challenges and Opportunities for Human-agent Collaboration CSCW. ACM, 193--196. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Brynn M. Evans and Ed H. Chi . 2008. Towards a Model of Understanding Social Search. In CSCW. ACM, 485--494. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gene Golovchinsky, Jeremy Pickens, and Abdigani Diriye . 2011. Designing for Collaboration in Information Seeking HCIR.Google Scholar
- Ralitza Gueorguieva and John H Krystal . 2004. Move over anova: Progress in analyzing repeated-measures data and its reflection in papers published in the archives of general psychiatry. Archives of general psychiatry (2004).Google Scholar
- Marti A. Hearst . 2014. What's Missing from Collaborative Search? Computer, Vol. 47, 3 (2014). Google ScholarDigital Library
- B. Hecht, J. Teevan, M.R. Morris, and D. Liebling . 2012. SearchBuddies: Bringing Search Engines into the Conversation ICWSM. AAAI, 138--145.Google Scholar
- Shamsi T. Iqbal and Brian P. Bailey . 2006. Leveraging Characteristics of Task Structure to Predict the Cost of Interruption CHI. ACM, 741--750. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Shamsi T. Iqbal and Brian P. Bailey . 2008. Effects of Intelligent Notification Management on Users and Their Tasks CHI. ACM, 93--102. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bernard J. Jansen and Michael D. McNeese . 2005. Evaluating the effectiveness of and patterns of interactions with automated searching assistance. JASIST, Vol. 56, 14 (2005), 1480--1503. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Malte F. Jung, Selma vSabanoviç, Friederike Eyssel, and Marlena Fraune . 2017. Robots in Groups and Teams. In CSCW. ACM, 401--407. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ryan Kelly and Stephen J. Payne . 2014. Collaborative Web Search in Context: A Study of Tool Use in Everyday Tasks CSCW. ACM, 807--819. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. R. Landis and G. G. Koch . 1977. The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data. Biometrics, Vol. 33, 1 (1977), 159--174.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Simon Y W Li, Farah Magrabi, and Enrico Coiera . 2012. A systematic review of the psychological literature on interruption and its patient safety implications. JAMIA (2012).Google Scholar
- Daniel McFarlane . 1999. Coordinating the interruptions of people in human-computer interaction HCI-INTERACT. IOS Press, 295--303.Google Scholar
- Meredith Ringel Morris . 2008. A Survey of Collaborative Web Search Practices. In CHI. ACM, 1657--1660. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Meredith Ringel Morris . 2013. Collaborative Search Revisited. In CSCW. ACM, 1181--1192. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Meredith Ringel Morris and Eric Horvitz . 2007. SearchTogether: An Interface for Collaborative Web Search UIST. ACM, 3--12. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Meredith Ringel Morris, Jaime Teevan, and Katrina Panovich . 2010. What Do People Ask Their Social Networks, and Why?: A Survey Study of Status Message Q&a Behavior. In CHI. ACM, 1739--1748. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sharoda A. Paul and Meredith Ringel Morris . 2009. CoSense: Enhancing Sensemaking for Collaborative Web Search CHI. ACM, 2007--2012. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nia Peters, Griffin Romigh, George Bradley, and Bhiksha Raj . 2016. When to Interrupt: A Comparative Analysis of Interruption Timings Within Collaborative Communication Tasks. In Proceedings of the AHFE 2016 International Conference on Human Factors and System Interactions. Springer.Google Scholar
- Jeremy Pickens, Gene Golovchinsky, Chirag Shah, Pernilla Qvarfordt, and Maribeth Back . 2008. Algorithmic Mediation for Collaborative Exploratory Search SIGIR. ACM, 315--322. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Martin Porcheron, Joel E. Fischer, Moira McGregor, Barry Brown, Ewa Luger, Heloisa Candello, and Kenton O'Hara . 2017. Talking with Conversational Agents in Collaborative Action CSCW. ACM, 431--436. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chirag Shah . 2010. Coagmento-a collaborative information seeking, synthesis and sense-making framework CSCW. ACM, 6--11.Google Scholar
- Chirag Shah . 2013. Effects of awareness on coordination in collaborative information seeking. JASIST, Vol. 64, 6 (2013).Google Scholar
- Chirag Shah, Madhu Reddy, and Michael Twidale . 2010. Collaborative Information Seeking (CIS): Toward New Theories and Applications GROUP. ACM, 321--326.Google Scholar
- Chirag Shah and Jennifer Sonne . 2015. Seeking Information in Online Environments: Where, Who, and Why? iConference.Google Scholar
- Iris Xie and Colleen Cool . 2009. Understanding help seeking within the context of searching digital libraries. JASIST Vol. 60 (2009), 477--494. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Zhen Yue, Shuguang Han, and Daqing He . 2012. An investigation of search processes in collaborative exploratory web search ASIST. Wiley.Google Scholar
- Z. Yue, S. Han, D. He, and J. Jiang . 2014. Influences on Query Reformulation in Collaborative Web Search. Computer, Vol. 47, 3 (2014). Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- SearchBots: User Engagement with ChatBots during Collaborative Search
Recommendations
Searchbots: Using Chatbots in Collaborative Information-seeking Tasks
SIGIR '17: Proceedings of the 40th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information RetrievalThe popularity of messaging platforms such as Slack has given rise to thousands of different chatbots that users can engage with individually or as a group. The proposed dissertation research will investigate the use of searchbots (i.e., chatbots that ...
The Effects of System Initiative during Conversational Collaborative Search
CSCW1Our research in this paper lies at the intersection of collaborative and conversational search. We report on a Wizard of Oz lab study in which 27 pairs of participants collaborated on search tasks over the Slack messaging platform. To complete tasks, ...
Embedding Search into a Conversational Platform to Support Collaborative Search
CHIIR '19: Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Human Information Interaction and RetrievalPopular messaging platforms such as Slack have given rise to thousands of applications (or bots) that users can engage with individually or as a group. In this paper, we study the use of searchbots (i.e., bots that perform specific types of searches) ...
Comments