skip to main content
10.1145/3176349.3176874acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Predicting Zika Prevention Techniques Discussed on Twitter: An Exploratory Study

Published:01 March 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Social media platforms are widely seen as a valuable medium to spread a wide range of information including charitable causes and health awareness. But given the flexibility provided by the social media platforms, it is important to ensure that the right kind of information is delivered to the right audience when needed. The pilot study presented in this paper considered a sample of Zika related tweets that were classified into different prevention techniques. The classification categories were drawn from the guidelines by CDC. Training a logistic regression model on the annotated data we found the accuracy to be 72%. The findings are significant in studying the effectiveness of social media platforms in spreading the right kind of information in time. This in turn can be useful in informing health care officials to take necessary steps with the help of real-time communication for such unfortunate events in future.

References

  1. S. Asur and B. A. Huberman. Predicting the future with social media. In Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (WI-IAT), 2010 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on, volume 1, pages 492--499. IEEE, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. K.-Y. Chen, L. R. Fine, and B. A. Huberman. Predicting the future. Information Systems Frontiers, 5(1):47--61, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. T. Dos Santos, A. Rodriguez, M. Almiron, A. Sanhueza, P. Ramon, W. K. de Oliveira, G. E. Coelho, R. Badaró, J. Cortez, M. Ospina, et al. Zika virus and the guillain-- barré syndrome--case series from seven countries. New England Journal of Medicine, 375(16):1598--1601, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. M. Dredze, D. A. Broniatowski, and K. M. Hilyard. Zika vaccine misconceptions: A social media analysis. Vaccine, 34(30):3441, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. E. M. Glowacki, A. J. Lazard, G. B. Wilcox, M. Mackert, and J. M. Bernhardt. Identifying the public's concerns and the centers for disease control and prevention's reactions during a health crisis: An analysis of a zika live twitter chat. American journal of infection control, 44(12):1709--1711, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. G. Holmes, A. Donkin, and I. H. Witten. Weka: A machine learning workbench. In Intelligent Information Systems, 1994. Proceedings of the 1994 Second Australian and New Zealand Conference on, pages 357--361. IEEE, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. A. M. Kaplan and M. Haenlein. Users of the world, unite! the challenges and opportunities of social media. Business horizons, 53(1):59--68, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. A. Kilgarriff. Wordnet: An electronic lexical database, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. C. Manning, P. Raghavan, and H. Schütze. Introduction to information retrieval/christopher d, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. M. Miller, D. Banerjee, R. Muppalla, D. Romine, D. Sheth, et al. What are people tweeting about zika' an exploratory study concerning symptoms, treatment, transmission, and prevention. arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.07490, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. S. O. Oyeyemi, E. Gabarron, and R. Wynn. Ebola, twitter, and misinformation: a dangerous combination' Bmj, 349:g6178, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. J. Pennington, R. Socher, and C. D. Manning. Glove: Global vectors for word representation. In Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 1532--1543, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. A. Perrin. Social media usage. Pew Research Center, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. S. A. Rasmussen, D. J. Jamieson, M. A. Honein, and L. R. Petersen. Zika virus and birth defects--reviewing the evidence for causality. N Engl J Med, 2016(374):1981-- 1987, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. A. Sadilek, H. A. Kautz, and V. Silenzio. Modeling spread of disease from social interactions. In ICWSM, pages 322--329, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Predicting Zika Prevention Techniques Discussed on Twitter: An Exploratory Study

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            CHIIR '18: Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Human Information Interaction & Retrieval
            March 2018
            402 pages
            ISBN:9781450349253
            DOI:10.1145/3176349

            Copyright © 2018 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 1 March 2018

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • short-paper

            Acceptance Rates

            CHIIR '18 Paper Acceptance Rate22of57submissions,39%Overall Acceptance Rate55of163submissions,34%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader