skip to main content
10.1145/3183519.3183553acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Helping SMEs to better develop software: experience report and challenges ahead

Published:27 May 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) play a key role in the worldwide economy and are increasingly dependent on software as part of their products/services or to support their operation (e.g. e-commerce, smart manufacturing). Over the past 15 years, as a research and technology transfer centre, CETIC has been busy helping Belgian SMEs to increase their maturity in software development. We have also contributed specific methods and tools for the SME target, including the OWPL framework and now the ISO29110 standard. This talk aims at sharing what we learned from different types of SMEs (from startups to grownups, both IT and non IT) about common problems gathered in a long term survey. We then focus on key issues like requirements, technical debt, test/release and (agile/lean) project management. Finally, we share our thoughts on new challenges ahead raised by the ever increasing connectivity like cybersecurity and privacy regulation (GDPR).

References

  1. S. Alexandre, A. Renault, and N. Habra. 2006. OWPL: A Gradual Approach for Software Process Improvement In SMEs. In 32nd EUROMICRO Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (EUROMICRO'06). 328--335. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. CETIC. 2001. Centre d'Excellence en Technologies de l'Information et de la Communication. https:\www.cetic.be. (2001).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Jean-Christophe Deprez, Christophe Ponsard, and Dimitri Durieux. 2014. Improving Small-to-Medium sized Enterprise Maturity in Software Development through the Use of ISO 29110. ERCIM News 2014, 99 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Digital Attraxion. 2016. First Hainaut Accelerator for Digital Startups. http://www.digital-attraxion.com. (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. European Commission. 2016. General Data Protection Regulation 2016/679. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32016R0679. (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Gartner. 2012. Survey Shows Why Projects Fail. (June 2012). http://thisiswhatgoodlookslike.com/2012/06/10Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Abby Ghobadian and David Gallear. 1997. TQM and organization size. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 17, 2 (1997), 121--163.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. ISO/IEC. 2011. 29110:2011, Software Engineering - Lifecycle Profiles for Very Small Entities (VSEs). http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/index.html. (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Marco Kuhrmann, Philipp Diebold, and JÃijrgen MÃijnch. 2016. Software process improvement: a systematic mapping study on the state of the art. PeerJ Computer Science 2 (May 2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Claude Y. Laporte. 2015. ISO29110 Software Basic Profiles Processes, CC BY-SA 4.0. https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=45486918. (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Annick Majchrowski, Christophe Ponsard, Sanae Saadaoui, Jacques Flamand, and Jean-Christophe Deprez. 2016. Software development practices in small entities: an ISO29110-based survey. Journal of Software: Evolution and Process 28, 11 (2016), 990--999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Patrice Muller and others. 2015. Annual Report on European SMEs 2014/2015 - SMEs start hiring again. European Commission. (Nov 2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Christophe Ponsard, Nicolas Devos, Dimitri Durieux, and Félix Bregadze. 2013. Managing Technical Debt in IT Startups: an Industrial Survey. In Proc. of the 25th Int. Conf. on Software and System Engineering and their Applications (ICSSEA), Telecom Paris-Tech, Paris, November 4-6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Chris Sauer and Christine Cuthbertson. 2003. The State of IT Project Management in the UK 2002-2003. Technical Report. Templeton College, University of Oxford.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Standish Group. 2015. CHAOS Report. (2015). http://www.standishgroup.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. WSL. 2000. Wallonia Space Logistics Incubator. http://www.wsl.be. (2000).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Helping SMEs to better develop software: experience report and challenges ahead

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          ICSE-SEIP '18: Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice
          May 2018
          336 pages
          ISBN:9781450356596
          DOI:10.1145/3183519

          Copyright © 2018 Owner/Author

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 27 May 2018

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • abstract

          Upcoming Conference

          ICSE 2025

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader