skip to main content
10.1145/3183713.3183719acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmodConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Efficient Exploration of Linked Data

Published: 27 May 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Harnessing the potential of the Semantic Web for building knowledgeable machines entails the ability to understand RDF graphs and integrate them with applications. Analyzing the vast information using common tools requires skill and time. Towards that we develop ELinda - an explorer for linked data. ELinda enables the understanding of the rich content stored in an RDF graph, via a visual query language for interactive exploration. The focus is on rich and open-domain datasets where it is especially challenging to detect the precise value to the application at hand. In essence, the model is based on the concept of a bar chart that depicts the distribution of a focus set of nodes (URIs), and each bar can be expanded to a new bar chart for further exploration. Three types of expansions are supported: subclass, property, and object. Under the hood, our visual query language is compiled into SPARQL. Yet, these queries require prohibitively long execution times on a standard SPARQL engine. To address this challenge, we develop a specialized query engine that is based on the concept of a worst-case-optimal join algorithm. The novel query engine provides a speedup of 1-2 orders of magnitude compared to standard SPARQL engines, and thereby facilitates the practical implementation of ELinda.

References

[1]
Openlink virtuoso. https://virtuoso.openlinksw.com/.
[2]
A. Atserias, M. Grohe, and D. Marx. Size bounds and query plans for relational joins. SIAM J. Comput., 42(4):1737--1767, 2013.
[3]
C. Bizer, J. Lehmann, G. Kobilarov, S. Auer, C. Becker, R. Cyganiak, and S. Hellmann. DBpedia - a crystallization point for the web of data. Web Semant., 7(3):154--165, Sept. 2009.
[4]
BSBM. Berlin sparql benchmark. http://wifo5-03.informatik.uni-mannheim.de/ bizer/berlinsparqlbenchmark/.
[5]
A.-S. Dadzie and M. Rowe. Approaches to visualising linked data: A survey. Semantic Web, 2(2):89--124, 2011.
[6]
S. M. Falconer, C. Callendar, and M.-A. D. Storey. A visualization service for the semantic web. In EKAW, volume 6317 of LNCS, pages 554--564. Springer, 2010.
[7]
W. Hop, S. de Ridder, F. Frasincar, and F. Hogenboom. Using hierarchical edge bundles to visualize complex ontologies in GLOW. In SAC, pages 304--311, 2012.
[8]
O. Kalinsky, Y. Etsion, and B. Kimelfeld. Flexible caching in trie joins. In EDBT, pages 282--293, 2017.
[9]
O. Mishali, T. Yahav, O. Kalinsky, and B. Kimelfeld. elinda: Explorer for linked data. CoRR, abs/1707.07623, 2017.
[10]
H. Q. Ngo, D. T. Nguyen, C. Ré, and A. Rudra. Beyond worst-case analysis for joins with minesweeper. In PODS, pages 234--245, 2014.
[11]
H. Q. Ngo, C. Ré, and A. Rudra. Skew strikes back: new developments in the theory of join algorithms. SIGMOD Record, 42(4):5--16, 2013.
[12]
B. Shneiderman. The eyes have it: A task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations. In VL, pages 336--343, 1996.
[13]
G. Tummarello, R. Cyganiak, M. Catasta, S. Danielczyk, R. Delbru, and S. Decker. Sig.ma: Live views on the web of data. J. Web Sem, 8(4):355--364, 2010.
[14]
T. L. Veldhuizen. Triejoin: A simple, worst-case optimal join algorithm. In ICDT, pages 96--106, 2014.
[15]
M.Weise, S. Lohmann, and F. Haag. LD-VOWL: extracting and visualizing schema information for linked data endpoints. In VOILA, volume 1704 of CEUR-WS, pages 120--127. CEUR-WS.org, 2016.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
SIGMOD '18: Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Management of Data
May 2018
1874 pages
ISBN:9781450347037
DOI:10.1145/3183713
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 27 May 2018

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Abstract

Funding Sources

  • Hasso Plattner Institute (HPI)

Conference

SIGMOD/PODS '18
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

SIGMOD '18 Paper Acceptance Rate 90 of 461 submissions, 20%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 785 of 4,003 submissions, 20%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 154
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)5
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media