skip to main content
research-article

Toward Personalized Activity Level Prediction in Community Question Answering Websites

Published:25 April 2018Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Community Question Answering (CQA) websites have become valuable knowledge repositories. Millions of internet users resort to CQA websites to seek answers to their encountered questions. CQA websites provide information far beyond a search on a site such as Google due to (1) the plethora of high-quality answers, and (2) the capabilities to post new questions toward the communities of domain experts. While most research efforts have been made to identify experts or to preliminarily detect potential experts of CQA websites, there has been a remarkable shift toward investigating how to keep the engagement of experts. Experts are usually the major contributors of high-quality answers and questions of CQA websites. Consequently, keeping the expert communities active is vital to improving the lifespan of these websites. In this article, we present an algorithm termed PALP to predict the activity level of expert users of CQA websites. To the best of our knowledge, PALP is the first approach to address a personalized activity level prediction model for CQA websites. Furthermore, it takes into consideration user behavior change over time and focuses specifically on expert users. Extensive experiments on the Stack Overflow website demonstrate the competitiveness of PALP over existing methods.

References

  1. Ashton Anderson, Daniel P. Huttenlocher, Jon M. Kleinberg, and Jure Leskovec. 2012. Discovering value from community activity on focused question answering sites: A case study of stack overflow. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD’12). 850--858. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Muhammad Asaduzzaman, Ahmed Shah Mashiyat, Chanchal K. Roy, and Kevin A. Schneider. 2013. Answering questions about unanswered questions of stack overflow. In Proceedings of the 10th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories. 97--100. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Francois Belletti, Daniel Haziza, Gabriel Gomes, and Alexandre M. Bayen. 2017. Expert level control of ramp metering based on multi-task deep reinforcement learning. CoRR abs/1701.08832.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Olivier Chapelle, Pannagadatta K. Shivaswamy, Srinivas Vadrevu, Kilian Q. Weinberger, Ya Zhang, and Belle L. Tseng. 2011. Boosted multi-task learning. Machine Learning 85, 1--2 (2011), 149--173. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Daniel Hasan Dalip, Marco Cristo, and Pavel Calado. 2013. Exploiting user feedback to learn to rank answers in Q8A forums: A case study with stack overflow. In Proceedings of SIGIR 13. 543--552. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Koustuv Dasgupta, Rahul Singh, Balaji Viswanathan, Dipanjan Chakraborty, Sougata Mukherjea, Amit A. Nanavati, and Anupam Joshi. 2008. Social ties and their relevance to churn in mobile telecom networks. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Extending Database Technology: Advances in Database Technology. 668--677. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Gideon Dror, Dan Pelleg, Oleg Rokhlenko, and Idan Szpektor. 2012. Churn prediction in new users of Yahoo! answers. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference Companion on World Wide Web. 829--834. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Scott Grant and Buddy Betts. 2013. Encouraging user behaviour with achievements: An empirical study. In Proceedings of the 10th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR’13). 65--68. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Isabelle Guyon, Vincent Lemaire, Marc Boullé, Gideon Dror, and David Vogel. 2009. Analysis of the KDD cup 2009: Fast scoring on a large orange customer database. In KDD Cup. 1--22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Jaya Kawale, Aditya Pal, and Jaideep Srivastava. 2009. Churn prediction in MMORPGs: A social influence based approach. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering (CSE’09). 423--428. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Cliff Lampe and Erik Johnston. 2005. Follow the (slash) dot: Effects of feedback on new members in an online community. In Proceedings of the 2005 International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work. 11--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Dun Liu, Tianrui Li, and Decui Liang. 2014. Incorporating logistic regression to decision-theoretic rough sets for classifications. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 55, 1 (2014), 197--210. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Duen Ren Liu, Yu Hsuan Chen, Wei Chen Kao, and Hsiu-Wen Wang. 2013. Integrating expert profile, reputation and link analysis for expert finding in question-answering websites. Information Processing & Management 49, 1 (2013), 312--329. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Xueliang Liu and Benoit Huet. 2016. Event-based cross media question answering. Multimedia Tools and Applications 75, 3 (2016), 1495--1508. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Dana Movshovitz-Attias, Yair Movshovitz-Attias, Peter Steenkiste, and Christos Faloutsos. 2013. Analysis of the reputation system and user contributions on a question answering website: Stackoverflow. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM’13). 886--893. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Liqiang Nie, Meng Wang, Luming Zhang, Shuicheng Yan, Bo Zhang, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2015. Disease inference from health-related questions via sparse deep learning. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 27, 8 (2015), 2107--2119.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Aditya Pal. 2015. Discovering experts across multiple domains. In Proceedings of the 38th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 923--926. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Aditya Pal, Shuo Chang, and Joseph A. Konstan. 2012. Evolution of experts in question answering communities. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. 274--281.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Aditya Pal, Rosta Farzan, Joseph A. Konstan, and Robert E. Kraut. 2011. Early detection of potential experts in question answering communities. In Proceedings of the 19th Conference on User Modeling, Adaption and Personalization. 231--242. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Lei Pang and Chong-Wah Ngo. 2016. Opinion question answering by sentiment clip localization. TOMCCAP 12, 2 (2016), 31:1--31:19. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Jagat Sastry Pudipeddi, Leman Akoglu, and Hanghang Tong. 2014. User churn in focused question answering sites: Characterizations and prediction. In Proceedings of the 23rd International World Wide Web Conference (WWW’14), Companion Volume. 469--474. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Fatemeh Riahi, Zainab Zolaktaf, Mahdi Shafiei, and Evangelos Milios. 2012. Finding expert users in community question answering. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web. 791--798. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Chirag Shah and Jefferey Pomerantz. 2010. Discovering value from community activity on focused question answering sites: A case study of stack overflow. In Proceedings of SIGIR’10. 411--418.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Qiongjie Tian, Peng Zhang, and Baoxin Li. 2013. Towards predicting the best answers in community-based question-answering services. In Proceedings of ICWSM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Wei Wang, Yan Yan, Luming Zhang, Richang Hong, and Nicu Sebe. 2016b. Collaborative sparse coding for multi-view action recognition. IEEE Multimedia Magazine 23, 4 (2016), 80--87. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Yaozheng Wang, Dawei Feng, Dongsheng Li, Xinyuan Chen, Yunxiang Zhao, and Xin Niu. 2016a. A mobile recommendation system based on logistic regression and gradient boosting decision trees. In Proceedings of the 2016 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN’16). 1896--1902.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Ming-Ju Wu and Jyh-Shing Roger Jang. 2015. Combining acoustic and multilevel visual features for music genre classification. TOMCCAP 12, 1 (2015), 10:1--10:17. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Jiang Yang, Xiao Wei, Mark S. Ackerman, and Lada A. Adamic. 2010. Activity lifespan: An analysis of user survival patterns in online knowledge sharing communities. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM’10).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Cheng Yue, Royce, Richard Hsu, and Nicholas Stevens. 2012. Discovering elite users in question and answering communities. CS (2012), 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhou Zhao, Xiaofei He Lijun Zhang, and Wilfred Ng. 2015. Expert finding for question answering via graph regularized matrix completion. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 27, 4 (2015), 1--12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Yin Zhu, ErHeng Zhong, Sinno Jialin Pan, Xiao Wang, Minzhe Zhou, and Qiang Yang. 2013. Predicting user activity level in social networks. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM’13). 159--168. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Toward Personalized Activity Level Prediction in Community Question Answering Websites

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications
      ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications  Volume 14, Issue 2s
      April 2018
      287 pages
      ISSN:1551-6857
      EISSN:1551-6865
      DOI:10.1145/3210485
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 25 April 2018
      • Accepted: 1 April 2017
      • Revised: 1 February 2017
      • Received: 1 October 2016
      Published in tomm Volume 14, Issue 2s

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader