skip to main content
10.1145/3188745.3188804acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesstocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Towards a proof of the 2-to-1 games conjecture?

Published:20 June 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present a polynomial time reduction from gap-3LIN to label cover with 2-to-1 constraints. In the “yes” case the fraction of satisfied constraints is at least 1 −ε, and in the “no” case we show that this fraction is at most ε, assuming a certain (new) combinatorial hypothesis on the Grassmann graph. In other words, we describe a combinatorial hypothesis that implies the 2-to-1 conjecture with imperfect completeness. The companion submitted paper [Dinur, Khot, Kindler, Minzer and Safra, STOC 2018] makes some progress towards proving this hypothesis.

Our work builds on earlier work by a subset of the authors [Khot, Minzer and Safra, STOC 2017] where a slightly different hypothesis was used to obtain hardness of approximating vertex cover to within factor of √2−ε.

The most important implication of this work is (assuming the hypothesis) an NP-hardness gap of 1/2−ε vs. ε for unique games. In addition, we derive optimal NP-hardness for approximating the max-cut-gain problem, NP-hardness of coloring an almost 4-colorable graph with any constant number of colors, and the same √2−ε NP-hardness for approximate vertex cover that was already obtained based on a slightly different hypothesis.

Recent progress towards proving our hypothesis [Barak, Kothari and Steurer, ECCC TR18-077], [Dinur, Khot, Kindler, Minzer and Safra, STOC 2018] directly implies some new unconditional NP-hardness results. These include new points of NP-hardness for unique games and for 2-to-1 and 2-to-2 games. More recently, the full version of our hypothesis was proven [Khot, Minzer and Safra, ECCC TR18-006].

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

3c-3.mp4

mp4

32.2 MB

References

  1. Sanjeev Arora, László Babai, Jacques Stern, and Z. Sweedyk. 1997. The Hardness of Approximate Optima in Lattices, Codes, and Systems of Linear Equations. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 54, 2 (1997), 317–331. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Sanjeev Arora, Boaz Barak, and David Steurer. 2015. Subexponential Algorithms for Unique Games and Related Problems. J. ACM 62, 5 (2015), 42. org/10.1145/2775105 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Sanjeev Arora, Carsten Lund, Rajeev Motwani, Madhu Sudan, and Mario Szegedy. 1998. Proof Verification and the Hardness of Approximation Problems. J. ACM 45, 3 (1998), 501–555. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Sanjeev Arora and Shmuel Safra. 1998. Probabilistic Checking of Proofs: A New Characterization of NP. J. ACM 45, 1 (1998), 70–122. 273865.273901 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Sanjeev Arora and Madhu Sudan. 2003. Improved Low-Degree Testing and its Applications. Combinatorica 23, 3 (2003), 365–426. s00493- 003- 0025- 0Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Boaz Barak, Pravesh Kothari, and David Steurer. 2018. Small-Set Expansion in Shortcode Graph and the 2-to-1 Conjecture. (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Personal communication.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Boaz Barak, Prasad Raghavendra, and David Steurer. 2011. Rounding Semidefinite Programming Hierarchies via Global Correlation. In IEEE 52nd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS. 472–481. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Mihir Bellare, Oded Goldreich, and Madhu Sudan. 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Free Bits, PCPs, and Nonapproximability – Towards Tight Results. SIAM J. Comput. 27, 3 (1998), 804–915. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Irit Dinur and Elazar Goldenberg. 2008. Locally testing direct products in the low error range. In FOCS. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Irit Dinur, Subhash Khot, Guy Kindler, Dor Minzer, and Muli Safra. 2016. Towards a Proof of the 2-to-1 Games Conjecture? Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity (ECCC) 23 (2016), 198. http://eccc.hpiweb.de/report/2016/198 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Irit Dinur, Subhash Khot, Guy Kindler, Dor Minzer, and Muli Safra. 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. On Non-Optimally Expanding Sets in Grassmann Graphs. Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity (ECCC) 24 (2017), 94. https://eccc.weizmann.ac.il/ report/2017/094Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Irit Dinur, Subhash Khot, Will Perkins, and Muli Safra. 2010. Hardness of Finding Independent Sets in Almost 3-Colorable Graphs. In 51th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS 2010, October 23-26, 2010, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA. 212–221. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Irit Dinur and Omer Reingold. 2006. Assignment Testers: Towards combinatorial proofs of the PCP theorem. SIAM J. Comput. 36, 4 (2006), 975–1024. Special issue on Randomness and Computation. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Irit Dinur and Samuel Safra. 2005. On the Hardness of Approximating Minimum Vertex Cover. Annals of Mathematics 162, 1 (2005), 439–485. http://www.jstor. org/stable/3597377Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Irit Dinur and David Steurer. 2014. Analytical approach to parallel repetition. In Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC 2014, New York, NY, USA, May 31 - June 03, 2014. 624–633. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Uriel Feige, Shafi Goldwasser, Laszlo Lovász, Shmuel Safra, and Mario Szegedy. 1996. Interactive Proofs and the Hardness of Approximating Cliques. J. ACM 43, 2 (March 1996), 268–292. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Venkatesan Guruswami, Johan Håstad, and Madhu Sudan. 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Hardness of Approximate Hypergraph Coloring. SIAM J. Comput. 31, 6 (2002), 1663–1686. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Venkatesan Guruswami and Ali Kemal Sinop. 2011. Lasserre Hierarchy, Higher Eigenvalues, and Approximation Schemes for Graph Partitioning and Quadratic Integer Programming with PSD Objectives. In IEEE 52nd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS 2011. 482–491. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Johan Håstad. 1996. Clique is Hard to Approximate Within n 1 − ε. In 37th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS ’96, Burlington, Vermont, USA, 14-16 October, 1996. 627–636. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Johan Håstad. 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Some Optimal Inapproximability Results. J. ACM 48, 4 (2001), 798–859. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Russell Impagliazzo, Valentine Kabanets, and Avi Wigderson. 2012. New Direct-Product Testers and 2-Query PCPs. SIAM J. Comput. 41, 6 (2012), 1722–1768.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Subhash Khot. 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. On the Power of Unique 2-Prover 1-Round Games. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity, Montréal, Québec, Canada, May 21-24, 2002. 25. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. 1004334Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Subhash Khot. 2010. Inapproximability of NP-complete problems, discrete fourier analysis, and geometry. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians 2010. 2676–2697.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Subhash Khot. 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. On the Unique Games Conjecture. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity, CCC 2010, Cambridge, Massachusetts, June 9-12, 2010. 99–121.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Subhash Khot, Dor Minzer, and Muli Safra. 2017. On independent sets, 2-to-2 games, and Grassmann graphs. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC 2017, Montreal, QC, Canada, June 19-23, 2017. 576–589. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Subhash Khot, Dor Minzer, and Muli Safra. 2018. Pseudorandom Sets in Grassmann Graph have Near-Perfect Expansion. Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity (ECCC) 25 (2018), 6. https://eccc.weizmann.ac.il/report/2018/ 006Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Subhash Khot and Dana Moshkovitz. 2016. Candidate Hard Unique Game. In Proceedings of the 48th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC 2016, Cambridge, MA, USA, June 18-21, 2016. 63–76. 1145/2897518.2897531 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Subhash Khot and Ryan O’Donnell. 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. SDP Gaps and UGC-hardness for Max-Cut-Gain. Theory of Computing 5, 1 (2009), 83–117. toc.2009.v005a004Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Ran Raz. 1998. A Parallel Repetition Theorem. SIAM J. Comput. 27, 3 (June 1998), 763–803. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. R. Raz and S. Safra. 1997. A Sub-Constant Error-Probability Low-Degree Test, and a Sub-Constant Error-Probability PCP Characterization of NP. 475–484. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Ran Raz and Shmuel Safra. 1997. A Sub-Constant Error-Probability Low-Degree Test, and a Sub-Constant Error-Probability PCP Characterization of NP. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computing, El Paso, Texas, USA, May 4-6, 1997. 475–484. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Ronitt Rubinfeld and Madhu Sudan. 1996. Robust Characterizations of Polynomials with Applications to Program Testing. SIAM J. Comput. 25, 2 (Feb. 1996), 252–271. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. D. Steurer. 2011. Subexponential algorithms for d-to-1 two-prover games and for certifying almost perfect expansion. (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Towards a proof of the 2-to-1 games conjecture?

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      STOC 2018: Proceedings of the 50th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing
      June 2018
      1332 pages
      ISBN:9781450355599
      DOI:10.1145/3188745

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 20 June 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,469of4,586submissions,32%

      Upcoming Conference

      STOC '24
      56th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 2024)
      June 24 - 28, 2024
      Vancouver , BC , Canada

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader