Abstract
The field of information retrieval (IR) is typically defined, in a variety of different wordings, as concerned with retrieval of documents that satisfy an information need. In this essay, I argue that these definitions are inaccurate, fail to capture major threads of activity in IR research, and in particular are flawed because they omit the element of human participation in the retrieval process. After outlining some perspectives to consider in formulating better definitions, I offer an option, as an illustration of how the field might be presented; this option is centred on the purpose of IR, namely, support of cognition. There is an obvious need for a clear statement of the purpose of the discipline: information access is recognized as a human right and IR is the basis of a critical technology for providing that access -- one that is deeply intertwined with daily life and is changing human psychology. Well-grounded descriptions can encourage IR researchers to embrace a view of the field that enables richer connection with other disciplines, and should embody a vision of what IR research can accomplish.
- Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948. United Nations General Assembly Resolution 217A.Google Scholar
- R. Baeza-Yates and B. Ribeiro-Neto. Modern Information Retrieval. AddisonWesley, second edition, 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- N. Belkin. Anomalous states of knowledge as a basis for information retrieval. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 5, 1980.Google Scholar
- N. Belkin. The cognitive viewpoint in information science. Journal of Information Science, 16, 1990. Google ScholarDigital Library
- N. Belkin. People, interacting with information. SIGIR Forum, 49(2), 2015. Salton Award lecture. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. S. Brown. Growing up digital: How the Web changes work, education, and the ways people learn. Change, 32(2), 2000.Google Scholar
- S. Buettcher, C. Clarke, and G. Cormack. Information Retrieval: Implementing and Evaluating Search Engines. MIT Press, 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- B. Croft, D. Metzler, and T. Strohman. Search Engines: Information Retrieval in Practice. Pearson, 2010. Updated as a free online edition by the authors in 2015. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Grimmelmann. What to do about Google? Communications of the ACM, 56(9), 2013. Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. Ingwerson and K. Järvelin. The Turn: Integration of information seeking and retrieval in context. Springer, 2005. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. D. Manning, P. Raghavan, and H. Schütze. Introduction to Information Retrieval. Cambridge University Press, 2008. Google ScholarCross Ref
- C. T. Meadow, B. R. Boyce, and D. H. Kraft. Text Information Retrieval Systems. Academic Press, second edition, 2000. Google ScholarDigital Library
- G. Salton. Automatic Information Organization and Retrieval. McGraw-Hill, 1968. Google ScholarDigital Library
- G. Salton and M. J. McGill. Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval. McGraw-Hill, 1983. Google ScholarDigital Library
- G. W. Small, T. D. Moody, P. Siddarth, and S. Y. Bookheimer. Your brain on Google: Patterns of cerebral activation during Internet searching. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 17(2), 2008.Google Scholar
- B. Sparrow, J. Liu, and D. M.Wegner. Google effects on memory: Cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips. Science, 333, 2011.Google Scholar
- A. Spink and C. Cole, editors. New Directions in Cognitive Information Retrieval. Springer, 2005. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. F. Ward. Supernormal: How the Internet is changing our minds and our memories. Psychological Inquiry, 24, 2013.Google Scholar
Recommendations
Information Retrieval eXperience (IRX): Towards a Human-Centered Personalized Model of Relevance
WI-IAT '10: Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology - Volume 03We approach Information Retrieval (IR) from a User eXperience (UX) perspective. Through introducing a model for Information Retrieval eXperience (IRX), this paper operationalizes a perspective on IR that reaches beyond topicality. Based on a document's ...
Evaluating scalability in information retrieval with multigraded relevance
AIRS'06: Proceedings of the Third Asia conference on Information Retrieval TechnologyFor the user’s point of view, in large environments, it can be desirable to have Information Retrieval Systems (IRS) that retrieve documents according to their relevance levels. Relevance levels have been studied in some previous Information Retrieval (...
Comments