skip to main content
research-article

Finding the Sweet Spot(s): Understanding Context to Support Physical Activity Plans

Authors Info & Claims
Published:26 March 2018Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Creating actionable plans has been shown to be helpful in promoting physical activity. However, little rèsearch has been done on how best to support the creation and execution of plans. In this paper, we interviewed 16 participants to study the role that context plays in the formulation and execution of plans for physical activity. Our findings highlight nuanced ways that contextual factors interact with each other and with individual differences to impact planning. We propose the notion of sweet spots to encapsulate how particular contextual factors converge to create optimal states for performing physical activities. The concept of sweet spots helped us to better understand the creation and execution of plans made by our participants. We present design guidelines to show how sweet spots can help support physical activity planning and guide the design of context-based tools for planning support.

References

  1. Mark Ackerman. 2000. The Intellectual Challenge of CSCW: The Gap Between Social Requirements and Technical Feasibility. Human-Computer Interaction 15, 2 (September 2000), 179--203. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Elena Agapie, Lucas Colusso, Sean A. Munson, and Gary Hsieh. 2016. PlanSourcing: Generating Behavior Change Plans with Friends and Crowds. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work 8 Social Computing (CSCW '16), 119--133. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Icek Ajzen. 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes 50, 2 (1991), 179--211.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Albert Bandura. 2002. Social foundations of thought and action. The health psychology reader (2002), 94--106.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Nikola Banovic, Tofi Buzali, Fanny Chevalier, Jennifer Mankoff, and Anind K. Dey. 2016. Modeling and Understanding Human Routine Behavior. 248--260. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Jared S. Bauer, Mark W. Newman, and Julie A. Kientz. 2014. What designers talk about when they talk about context. Human-Computer Interaction 29, 5--6 (2014), 420--450.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Frank Bentley, Konrad Tollmar, Peter Stephenson, Laura Levy, Brian Jones, Scott Robertson, Ed Price, Richard Catrambone, and Jeff Wilson. 2013. Health Mashups: Presenting Statistical Patterns Between Wellbeing Data and Context in Natural Language to Promote Behavior Change. A CM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 20, 5 (November 2013), 30:1--30:27. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Lisa F. Berkman. 1995. The role of social relations in health promotion. Psychosomatic medicine 57, 3 (1995), 245--254.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Natasha Carraro and Patrick Gaudreau. 2013. Spontaneous and experimentally induced action planning and coping planning for physical activity: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Sport and Exercise 14, 2 (2013), 228--248.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Jaesung Choi, Miyoung Lee, Jong-koo Lee, Daehee Kang, and Ji-Yeob Choi. 2017. Correlates associated with participation in physical activity among adults: a systematic review of reviews and update. BMC Public Health 17, (April 2017).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Sunny Consolvo, Katherine Everitt, Ian Smith, and James A. Landay. 2006. Design requirements for technologies that encourage physical activity. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '06), 457--466. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. John W. Creswell. 2013. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Scott Davidoff, Brian D. Ziebart, John Zimmerman, and Anind K. Dey. 2011. Learning Patterns of Pick-ups and Drop-offs to Support Busy Family Coordination. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11), 1175--1184. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Scott Davidoff, John Zimmerman, and Anind K. Dey. 2010. How routine learners can support family coordination. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2461--2470. Retrieved September 15, 2016 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1753699 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Stephan U. Dombrowski, Falko F. Sniehotta, Alison Avenell, Marie Johnston, Graeme MacLennan, and Vera Araújo-Soares. 2012. Identifying active ingredients in complex behavioural interventions for obese adults with obesity-related co-morbidities or additional risk factors for co-morbidities: a systematic review. Health Psychology Review 6, 1 (March 2012), 7--32.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Paul Dourish. 2004. What we talk about when we talk about context. Personal Technologies 8, 1 (February 2004), 19--30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Genevieve Fridlund Dunton and Audie A. Atienza. 2009. The Need for Time-Intensive Information in Healthful Eating and Physical Activity Research: A Timely Topic. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 109, 1 (January 2009), 30--35.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Genevieve Fridlund Dunton, Audie A. Atienza, Cynthia M. Castro, and Abby C. King. 2009. Using Ecological Momentary Assessment to Examine Antecedents and Correlates of Physical Activity Bouts in Adults Age 50+ Years: A Pilot Study. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 38, 3 (December 2009), 249--255.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Genevieve Fridlund Dunton, Yue Liao, Stephen Intille, Jimi Huh, and Adam Leventhal. 2015. Momentary assessment of contextual influences on affective response during physical activity. Health Psychology 34, 12 (2015), 1145--1153.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Daniel A. Epstein, An Ping, James Fogarty, and Sean A. Munson. 2015. A Lived Informatics Model of Personal Informatics. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp '15), 731--742. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Lise Gauvin, W. Jack Rejeski, and Beth A. Reboussin. 2000. Contributions of acute bouts of vigorous physical activity to explaining diurnal variations in feeling states in active, middle-aged women. Health Psychology 19, 4 (2000), 365.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Peter M. Gollwitzer. 1999. Implementation intentions: strong effects of simple plans. American psychologist 54, 7 (1999), 493.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Peter M. Gollwitzer and Paschal Sheeran. 2006. Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes. Advances in experimental social psychology 38, (2006), 69--119.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Google. 2016. Find time for your goals with Google Calendar. Retrieved May 15, 2017 from http://blog.google:443/products/calendar/find-time-goals-google-calendar/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Eric B. Hekler, Matthew P. Buman, David Ahn, Genevieve Dunton, Audie A. Atienza, and Abby C. King. 2012. Are daily fluctuations in perceived environment associated with walking? Psychology 8 Health 27, 9 (September 2012), 1009--1020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Eric B. Hekler, Susan Michie, Misha Pavel, Daniel E. Rivera, Linda M. Collins, Holly B. Jimison, Claire Garnett, Skye Parral, and Donna Spruijt-Metz. 2016. Advancing Models and Theories for Digital Behavior Change Interventions. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 51, 5 (November 2016), 825--832.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. C. Hoffman, D. Rice, and H. Y. Sung. 1996. Persons with chronic conditions. Their prevalence and costs. JAMA 276, 18 (November 1996), 1473--1479.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Jennifer L. Huberty, Diane Ehlers, Jason Coleman, Yong Gao, and Steriani Elavsky. 2013. Women bound to be active: differences in long-term physical activity between completers and noncompleters of a book club intervention. Journal of Physical Activity and Health (2013). Retrieved September 14, 2016 from http://scholarworks.boisestate.edu/kinesiology_facpubs/111/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Nancy Humpel, Neville Owen, and Eva Leslie. 2002. Environmental factors associated with adults' participation in physical activity: a review. American journal of preventive medicine 22, 3 (2002), 188--199.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Robert Hurling, Michael Catt, Marco De Boni, Bruce William Fairley, Tina Hurst, Peter Murray, Alannah Richardson, and Jaspreet Singh Sodhi. 2007. Using Internet and Mobile Phone Technology to Deliver an Automated Physical Activity Program: Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research 9, 2 (April 2007), e7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Predrag Klasnja and Wanda Pratt. 2012. Healthcare in the pocket: Mapping the space of mobile-phone health interventions. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 45, 1 (February 2012), 184--198. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Dominika Kwasnicka, Justin Presseau, Martin White, and Falko F. Sniehotta. 2013. Does planning how to cope with anticipated barriers facilitate health-related behaviour change? A systematic review. Health psychology review 7, 2 (2013), 129--145.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. James T. Lamiell. 2003. Beyond individual and group differences: Human individuality, scientific psychology, and William Stern's critical personalism. Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Gary P Latham and Edwin A Locke. 1991. Self-regulation through goal setting. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50, 2 (December 1991), 212--247.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Sophie Lewis, Samantha L. Thomas, R. Warwick Blood, David Castle, Jim Hyde, and Paul A. Komesaroff. 2011. "I'm searching for solutions": why are obese individuals turning to the Internet for help and support with "being fat"? Health Expect 14, 4 (December 2011), 339--350.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Ian Li, Anind K. Dey, and Jodi Forlizzi. 2012. Using Context to Reveal Factors That Affect Physical Activity. ACM Trans. Comput.- Hum. Interact. 19, 1 (May 2012), 7:1--7:21. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Yue Liao, Eleanor T. Shonkoff, and Genevieve F. Dunton. 2015. The Acute Relationships Between Affect, Physical Feeling States, and Physical Activity in Daily Life: A Review of Current Evidence. Front Psychol 6, (December 2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Aleksandra Luszczynska. 2006. An implementation intentions intervention, the use of a planning strategy, and physical activity after myocardial infarction. Social Science 8 Medicine 62, 4 (February 2006), 900--908.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Emily L. Mailey and Edward McAuley. 2014. Impact of a brief intervention on physical activity and social cognitive determinants among working mothers: a randomized trial. Journal of behavioral medicine 37, 2 (2014), 343--355.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. C.A. Martin, D.E. Rivera, W.T. Riley, E.B. Hekler, M.P. Buman, M.A. Adams, and A.C. King. 2014. A dynamical systems model of Social Cognitive Theory. In American Control Conference (ACC), 2014, 2407--2412.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Chetan D. Mistry, Shane N. Sweet, Ryan E. Rhodes, and Amy E. Latimer-Cheung. 2015. Text2Plan: Exploring changes in the quantity and quality of action plans and physical activity in a text messaging intervention. Psychol Health 30, 7 (2015), 839--856.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Peter CM Molenaar. 2004. A manifesto on psychology as idiographic science: Bringing the person back into scientific psychology, this time forever. Measurement 2, 4 (2004), 201--218.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Jeni Paay, Jesper Kjeldskov, Mikael B. Skov, Lars Lichon, and Stephan Rasmussen. 2015. Understanding Individual Differences for Tailored Smoking Cessation Apps. In Proceedings of the 3 3rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15), 1699--1708. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Andrew Prestwich, Marco Perugini, and Robert Hurling. 2010. Can implementation intentions and text messages promote brisk walking? A randomized trial. Health Psychology 29, 1 (2010), 40--49.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Mashfiqui Rabbi, Angela Pfammatter, Mi Zhang, Bonnie Spring, and Tanzeem Choudhury. 2015. Automated Personalized Feedback for Physical Activity and Dietary Behavior Change With Mobile Phones: A Randomized Controlled Trial on Adults. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 3, 2 (May 2015), e42.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Milagros C Rosal, Cara B Ebbeling, Ingrid Lofgren, Judith K Ockene, Ira S Ockene, and James R Hebert. 2001. Facilitating Dietary Change: The Patient-Centered Counseling Model. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 101, 3 (March 2001), 332--341.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Johnny Saldaña. 2015. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Sarah-Jeanne Salvy, Julie Wojslawowicz Bowker, James N. Roemmich, Natalie Romero, Elizabeth Kieffer, Rocco Paluch, and Leonard H. Epstein. 2007. Peer influence on children's physical activity: an experience sampling study. Journal of pediatric psychology 33, 1 (2007), 39--49.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Sarah-Jeanne Salvy, James N. Roemmich, Julie C. Bowker, Natalie D. Romero, Phillip J. Stadler, and Leonard H. Epstein. 2008. Effect of peers and friends on youth physical activity and motivation to be physically active. Journal of pediatric psychology 34, 2 (2008), 217--225.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. S. L. Saperstein, N. L. Atkinson, and R. S. Gold. 2007. The impact of Internet use for weight loss. Obes Rev 8, 5 (September 2007), 459--465.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Paschal Sheeran. 2002. Intention---behavior relations: A conceptual and empirical review. European review of social psychology 12, 1 (2002), 1--36.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Donna Spruijt-Metz, Eric Hekler, Niilo Saranummi, Stephen Intille, Ilkka Korhonen, Wendy Nilsen, Daniel E. Rivera, Bonnie Spring, Susan Michie, David A. Asch, Alberto Sanna, Vicente Traver Salcedo, Rita Kukakfa, and Misha Pavel. 2015. Building new computational models to support health behavior change and maintenance: new opportunities in behavioral research. Behav. Med. Pract. Policy Res. 5, 3 (September 2015), 335--346.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Shane N. Sweet, Lawrence R. Brawley, Alexandra Hatchell, Heather L. Gainforth, and Amy E. Latimer-Cheung. 2014. Can persuasive messages encourage individuals to create action plans for physical activity? Journal of sport 8 exercise psychology 36, 4 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Richard P. Troiano, David Berrigan, Kevin W. Dodd, Louise C. Masse, Timothy Tilert, Margaret McDowell, and others. 2008. Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. Medicine and science in sports and exercise 40, 1 (2008), 181.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Stewart G. Trost, Neville Owen, Adrian E. Bauman, James F. Sallis, and Wendy Brown. 2002. Correlates of adults' participation in physical activity: review and update. Medicine 8 Science in Sports 8 Exercise 34, 12 (2002), 1996--2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Emely de Vet, Anke Oenema, and Johannes Brug. 2011. More or better: Do the number and specificity of implementation intentions matter in increasing physical activity? Psychology of Sport and Exercise 12, 4 (2011), 471--477.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Emely De Vet, Anke Oenema, Paschal Sheeran, and Johannes Brug. 2009. Should implementation intentions interventions be implemented in obesity prevention: the impact of if-then plans on daily physical activity in Dutch adults. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 6, 1 (March 2009), 11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Wikipedia. 2017. Affinity diagram. Retrieved November 12, 2017 from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Affinity_diagram8oldid=772829913Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Wikipedia. 2017. Automated planning and scheduling. Retrieved May 13, 2017 from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Automated_planning_and_scheduling8oldid=779693832Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Jochen P. Ziegelmann, Sonia Lippke, and Ralf Schwarzer. 2006. Adoption and maintenance of physical activity: Planning interventions in young, middle-aged, and older adults. Psychology 8 Health 21,2 (2006), 145--163.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. May 2016 National Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates. Retrieved May 10, 2017 from https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_nat.htm#00-0000Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Overcoming Barriers to Physical Activity | Basics | Physical Activity | DNPAO | CDC. Retrieved November 20, 2015 from http://www.cdc.gov/physicalactivity/basics/adding-pa/barriers.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Finding the Sweet Spot(s): Understanding Context to Support Physical Activity Plans

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
      Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies  Volume 2, Issue 1
      March 2018
      1370 pages
      EISSN:2474-9567
      DOI:10.1145/3200905
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 March 2018
      • Accepted: 1 January 2018
      • Revised: 1 November 2017
      • Received: 1 May 2017
      Published in imwut Volume 2, Issue 1

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader