skip to main content
10.1145/3193025.3193059acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicdspConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Research on SIFT Image Matching Based on MLESAC Algorithm

Authors Info & Claims
Published:25 February 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

The difference of sensor devices and the camera position offset will lead the geometric differences of the matching images. The traditional SIFT image matching algorithm has a large number of incorrect matching point pairs and the matching accuracy is low during the process of image matching. In order to solve this problem, a SIFT image matching based on Maximum Likelihood Estimation Sample Consensus (MLESAC) algorithm is proposed. Compared with the traditional SIFT feature matching algorithm, SURF feature matching algorithm and RANSAC feature matching algorithm, the proposed algorithm can effectively remove the false matching feature point pairs during the image matching process. Experimental results show that the proposed algorithm has higher matching accuracy and faster matching efficiency.

References

  1. Moravec H P., 1981. Rover Visual Obstacle Avoidance. IJCAI, Vancouver, British Columbia?(Nov.1981), 785--790. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Harris, Chris, and Mike Stephens. 1988. A combined corner and edge detector. Alvey vision conference. Vol. 15. No. 50.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Lowe, David G. 2004. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. International journal of computer vision 60.2,(Nov. 2004) 91--110. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Ke, Yan, and Rahul Sukthankar. 2004. PCA-SIFT: A more distinctive representation for local image descriptors. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2004. Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Computer Society Conference on. Vol. 2. IEEE, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Abdel-Hakim, Alaa E., and Aly A. Farag. 2006. CSIFT: A SIFT descriptor with color invariant characteristics. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on. Vol. 2. IEEE. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Ismail, Boukli Hacene, and A. Bessaid. 2014. Gray Scale and Color Medical Image Compression by Lifting Wavelet; Bandelet and Quincunx Wavelets Transforms: A Comparison Study.Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Boroş, Emanuela, George Roşca, and Adrian Iftene. 2009. Using sift method for global topological localization for indoor environments. Workshop of the Cross-Language Evaluation Forum for European Languages. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Suzuki, Taro, Yoshiharu Amano, and Takumi Hashizume. 2010. Vision based localization of a small UAV for generating a large mosaic image. SICE Annual Conference 2010, Proceedings of. IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Bay, Herbert, Tinne Tuytelaars, and Luc Van Gool. 2006. Surf: Speeded up robust features. Computer vision--ECCV (2006): 404--417. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Wei, Wang, Hong Jun, and Tang Yiping. 2008. Image matching for geomorphic measurement based on SIFT and RANSAC methods. Computer Science and Software Engineering, 2008 International Conference on. Vol. 2. IEEE. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Fuiorea, D., Gui, V., Pescaru, D., & Toma, C. 2009. Kernel based image registration versus MLESAC: A comparative study. In Applied Computational Intelligence and Informatics, 2009. SACI'09. 5th International Symposium on (pp. 255--260). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Research on SIFT Image Matching Based on MLESAC Algorithm

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICDSP '18: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Digital Signal Processing
      February 2018
      198 pages
      ISBN:9781450364027
      DOI:10.1145/3193025

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 25 February 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader