skip to main content
10.1145/3195570.3195582acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Software testing conferences and women

Published: 28 May 2018 Publication History

Abstract

The question of gender equality is an increasing concern in all aspects of life these days. ICT has its peculiarities in this respect, as it is often regarded as a "male" discipline. Among the many different subfields of ICT, in this work we concentrate on software testing, an area in which a significant portion of all ICT professionals is engaged. Testing is an interesting field because according to certain views more women work in this area compared to other ICT fields. Since testing itself still covers a large topic involving education, research and industry, we further limit our analysis to software testing conferences and the rate of women participation in important roles at these venues. We looked at keynote speakers and chairs in different roles and program committees, but not the participants themselves as reliable data was available only for the former. We investigated if gender distribution was similar to or different from the reported data for ICT as a whole. We also compared the different types of conferences, academic and industrial, from this aspect. We have found, among other things, that gender ratio at software testing conferences is similar to other fields, but in more important roles such as keynotes, equality is more significantly maintained.

References

[1]
David N. Beede, Tiffany A. Julian, David Langdon, George McKittrick, Beethika Khan, and Mark E. Doms. 2011. Women in STEM: A Gender Gap to Innovation. Economics and Statistics Administration Issue (aug 2011), 04-11.
[2]
Árpád Beszédes and László Vidács. 2016. Academic and Industrial Software Testing Conferences: Survey and Synergies. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation Workshops: 11th Workshop on Testing: Academia-Industry Collaboration, Practice and Research Techniques (TAIC PART'16). 240--249.
[3]
Chris Brooks, Evelyn M. Fenton, and James T. Walker. 2014. Gender and the evaluation of research. Research Policy 43, 6 (2014), 990--1001.
[4]
Catalyst. 2018. Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM). http://www.catalyst.org/knowledge/women-science-technology-engineering-and-mathematics-stem. (2018). webpage.
[5]
Catalyst. 2018. Women in the Sciences. http://www.catalyst.org/knowledge/women-sciences. (2018). webpage.
[6]
Colin Cherry. 2018. Does Gender Equality Exist within Software Testing? https://itesting.com.au/2013/05/24/does-gender-equality-exist-within-software-testing/. (2018). web blog.
[7]
Paul A. David and Joseph S. Shapiro. 2008. Community-based production of open-source software: What do we know about the developers who participate? Information Economics and Policy 20, 4 (2008), 364 -- 398. Empirical Issues in Open Source Software.
[8]
Eurostat. 2018. ICT specialists in employment. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/ICT_specialists_in_employment. (2018). webpage.
[9]
Katrina Falkner, Claudia Szabo, Dee Michell, Anna Szorenyi, and Shantel Thyer. 2015. Gender Gap in Academia: Perceptions of Female Computer Science Academics. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 111--116.
[10]
Association for Computing Machinery Women. 2018. https://women.acm.org/. (2018).
[11]
Women in Global Science & Technology. 2018. http://wisat.org/who-we-are/organization/. (2018).
[12]
Women in Science International Trust. 2018. http://womeninscience.rasit.org/. (2018).
[13]
Girls in Tech. 2018. http://girlsintech.org. (2018).
[14]
Women in Technology International. 2018. Women in Technology International webpage. (2018). http://www.witi.com/about
[15]
Global Women Inventors and Innovators network. 2018. http://www.gwiin.com/page.php?pid=2&menu=main. (2018).
[16]
LinuxChix. 2018. http://www.linuxchix.org/. (2018).
[17]
National Science Foundation. 2017. National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. 2017. Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2017. www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd. (2017). Accessed (January 13, 2018).
[18]
Global Telecom Women's Networ. 2018. http://www.gtwn.org. (2018).
[19]
The International Network of Women Engineers and Scientists. 2018. http://www.inwes.org. (2018).
[20]
PHPWomen. 2018. http://phpwomen.org. (2018).
[21]
Rosie Sherry. 2014. On Women, In Testing. https://www.ministryoftesting.com/2014/12/women-testing/. (12 2014).
[22]
Johan Steyn. 2018. The Female Touch: Women in Software Testing. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/female-touch-women-software-testing-johan-steyn/. (2018). webpage.
[23]
Valentina Tartari and Ammon Salter. 2015. The engagement gap: Exploring gender differences in University - Industry collaboration activities. Research Policy 44, 6 (2015), 1176--1191.
[24]
TechWomen. 2018. http://www.techwomen.org/. (2018).
[25]
Josh Terrell, Andrew Kofink, Justin Middleton, Clarissa Rainear, Emerson Murphy-Hill, Chris Parnin, and Jon Stallings. 2017. Gender differences and bias in open source: pull request acceptance of women versus men. PeerJ Computer Science 3 (May 2017), e111.
[26]
Eileen M. Trauth, Jeria L. Quesenberry, and Allison J. Morgan. 2004. Understanding the Under Representation of Women in IT: Toward a Theory of Individual Differences. In Proceedings of the 2004 SIGMIS Conference on Computer Personnel Research: Careers, Culture, and Ethics in a Networked Environment (SIGMIS CPR '04). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 114--119.
[27]
United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). 2018. Employed persons by detailed occupation, sex, race, and Hispanic or Latino ethnicity. <https://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat11.htm>. (2018). Accessed (January 13, 2018).
[28]
B. Vasilescu, A. Capiluppi, and A. Serebrenik. 2012. Gender, Representation and Online Participation: A Quantitative Study of StackOverflow. In 2012 International Conference on Social Informatics. 332--338.
[29]
Apache Women. 2018. Women Wiki webpage. (2018). https://wiki.apache.org/Women/FrontPag
[30]
Information Age Education Women and ICT. 2018. http://iae-pedia.org/Women_and_ICT. (2018).
[31]
Ubuntu Women. 2018. http://wiki.ubuntu-women.org/Home. (2018).

Index Terms

  1. Software testing conferences and women

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    GE '18: Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Gender Equality in Software Engineering
    May 2018
    62 pages
    ISBN:9781450357388
    DOI:10.1145/3195570
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 28 May 2018

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. academia-industry collaboration
    2. gender equality
    3. software testing conferences
    4. women in ICT
    5. women in testing

    Qualifiers

    • Short-paper

    Funding Sources

    • European Social Fund

    Conference

    ICSE '18
    Sponsor:

    Upcoming Conference

    ICSE 2025

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 122
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)13
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 20 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media