skip to main content
10.1145/3196709.3196788acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Your Place and Mine: Designing a Shared VR Experience for Remotely Located Users

Authors Info & Claims
Published:08 June 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Virtual reality can help realize mediated social experiences where distance disappears and we interact as richly with those around the world as we do with those in the same room. The design of social virtual experiences presents a challenge for remotely located users with room-scale setups like those afforded by recent commodity virtual reality devices. Since users inhabit different physical spaces that may not be the same size, a mapping to a shared virtual space is needed for creating experiences that allow everyone to use real walking for locomotion. We designed three mapping techniques that enable users from diverse room-scale setups to interact together in virtual reality. Results from our user study (N = 26) show that our mapping techniques positively influence the perceived degree of togetherness and copresence while the size of each user's tracked space influences individual presence.

References

  1. Jeremy N. Bailenson, Jim Blascovich, Andrew C. Beall, and Jack M. Loomis. 2001. Equilibrium Theory Revisited: Mutual Gaze and Personal Space in Virtual Environments. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 10, 6 (Dec. 2001), 583--598. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Jeremy N. Bailenson, Jim Blascovich, Andrew C. Beall, and Jack M. Loomis. 2003. Interpersonal distance in immersive virtual environments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 29, 7 (2003), 819--833.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Cagatay Basdogan, Chih-Hao Ho, Mandayam A. Srinivasan, and Mel Slater. 2000. An Experimental Study on the Role of Touch in Shared Virtual Environments. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 7, 4 (Dec. 2000), 443--460. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Steve Benford, John Bowers, Lennart E. Fahlén, Chris Greenhalgh, and Dave Snowdon. 1995. User Embodiment in Collaborative Virtual Environments. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '95). ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., New York, NY, USA, 242--249. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Frank Biocca and Chad Harms. 2002. Defining and Measuring Social Presence: Contribution to the Networked Minds Theory and Measure. Proceedings of PRESENCE 2002 (2002), 7--36.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Chuck Blanchard, Scott Burgess, Young Harvill, Jaron Lanier, Ann Lasko, Mark Oberman, and Mike Teitel. 1990. Reality Built for Two: A Virtual Reality Tool. SIGGRAPH Comput. Graph. 24, 2 (Feb. 1990), 35--36. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Frederick P. Brooks, Jr. 1987. Walkthrough-a Dynamic Graphics System for Simulating Virtual Buildings. In Proceedings of the 1986 Workshop on Interactive 3D Graphics (I3D '86). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 9--21. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Jacky C. P. Chan, Howard Leung, Jeff K. T. Tang, and Taku Komura. 2011. A Virtual Reality Dance Training System Using Motion Capture Technology. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 4, 2 (April 2011), 187--195. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Robert R. Christensen, John M. Hollerbach, Yangming Xu, and Sanford G. Meek. 2000. Inertial-Force Feedback for the Treadport Locomotion Interface. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 9, 1 (2000), 1--14. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. E. F. Churchill and D. Snowdon. 1998. Collaborative Virtual Environments: An Introductory Review of Issues and Systems. Virtual Real. 3, 1 (March 1998), 3--15. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Paul Dourish, Annette Adler, Victoria Bellotti, and Austin Henderson. 1996. Your Place or Mine? Learning from Long-term Use of Audio-video Communication. Comput. Supported Coop. Work 5, 1 (Sept. 1996), 33--62. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Nat Durlach and Mel Slater. 2000. Presence in Shared Virtual Environments and Virtual Togetherness. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 9, 2 (April 2000), 214--217. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Emmanuel Frécon and Mårten Stenius. 1998. DIVE: A Scaleable Network Architecture for Distributed Virtual Environments. Distributed Systems Engineering 5, 3 (1998), 91.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Erving Goffman. 2008. Behavior in Public Places. Free Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Chris Greenhalgh and Steven Benford. 1995. MASSIVE: A Collaborative Virtual Environment for Teleconferencing. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 2, 3 (Sept. 1995), 239--261. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Jan Gugenheimer, Evgeny Stemasov, Julian Frommel, and Enrico Rukzio. 2017. ShareVR: Enabling Co-Located Experiences for Virtual Reality Between HMD and Non-HMD Users. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 4021--4033. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. A. Guye-Vuillème, T. K. Capin, S. Pandzic, N. Magnenat Thalmann, and D. Thalmann. 1999. Nonverbal Communication Interface for Collaborative Virtual Environments. Virtual Reality 4, 1 (01 Mar 1999), 49--59. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Koaburo Hachimura, Hiromu Kato, and Hideyuki Tamura. 2004. A Prototype Dance Training Support System with Motion Capture and Mixed Reality Technologies. In 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. IEEE, 217--222.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Edward Twitchell Hall. 1966. The Hidden Dimension. (1966).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. D. Henry and T. Furness. 1993. Spatial Perception in Virtual Environments: Evaluating an Architectural Application. In Proceedings of the 1993 IEEE Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium (VRAIS '93). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 33--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. W. A. Ijsselsteijn, Y. A. W. de Kort, and K. Poels. 2013. The Game Experience Questionnaire. (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Hiroo Iwata. 1999. Walking About Virtual Environments on an Infinite Floor. In Proceedings of the IEEE Virtual Reality (VR '99). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 286--. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=554230.835685 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Hiroo Iwata, Hiroaki Yano, and Fumitaka Nakaizumi. 2001. Gait Master: A Versatile Locomotion Interface for Uneven Virtual Terrain. In Proceedings of the Virtual Reality 2001 Conference (VR'01) (VR '01). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 131--. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=580521.835815 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Mikkel R. Jakobsen and Kasper Hornbæk. 2016. Negotiating for Space?: Collaborative Work Using a Wall Display with Mouse and Touch Input. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2050--2061. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. David Kirsh. 2013. Embodied Cognition and the Magical Future of Interaction Design. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 20, 1, Article 3 (April 2013), 30 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Joan Llobera, Bernhard Spanlang, Giulio Ruffini, and Mel Slater. 2010. Proxemics with Multiple Dynamic Characters in an Immersive Virtual Environment. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept. 8, 1, Article 3 (Nov. 2010), 12 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Michael Meehan. 2001. Physiological Reaction as an Objective Measure of Presence in Virtual Environments. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of North Carolina. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Maurice Merleau-Ponty. 1996. Phenomenology of Perception. Motilal Banarsidass Publishe.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Teresa Monahan, Gavin McArdle, and Michela Bertolotto. 2008. Virtual reality for collaborative e-learning. Computers & Education 50, 4 (2008), 1339--1353. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Jauvane C. Oliveira, Xiaojun Shen, and Nicolas D Georganas. 2000. Collaborative virtual environment for industrial training and e-commerce. IEEE VRTS 288 (2000).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Clare Regan. 1995. An Investigation into Nausea and Other Side-effects of Head-coupled Immersive Virtual Reality. Virtual Reality 1, 1 (01 Jun 1995), 17--31. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Roy A. Ruddle and Simon Lessels. 2009. The Benefits of Using a Walking Interface to Navigate Virtual Environments. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 16, 1, Article 5 (April 2009), 18 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Maria V Sanchez-Vives and Mel Slater. 2005. From presence to consciousness through virtual reality. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 6, 4 (2005), 332--339.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Ralph Schroeder. 2002. Copresence and Interaction in Virtual Environments: An Overview of the Range of Issues. In Presence 2002: Fifth international workshop. 274--295.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. J. Short, E. Williams, and B. Christie. 1976. The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. Wiley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Mel Slater. 2009. Place Illusion and Plausibility can Lead to Realistic Behaviour in Immersive Virtual Environments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 364, 1535 (2009), 3549--3557.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Mel Slater and Maria V. Sanchez-Vives. 2016. Enhancing Our Lives with Immersive Virtual Reality. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 3 (2016), 74.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Mel Slater and Martin Usoh. 1993. Representations Systems, Perceptual Position, and Presence in Immersive Virtual Environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 2, 3 (1993), 221--233. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Mel Slater and Martin Usoh. 1994. Body Centred Interaction in Immersive Virtual environments. Artificial life and virtual reality 1, 1994 (1994), 125--148.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Mel Slater, Martin Usoh, and Anthony Steed. 1994. Depth of Presence in Virtual Environments. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 3, 2 (Jan. 1994), 130--144. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Mel Slater, Martin Usoh, and Anthony Steed. 1995. Taking Steps: The Influence of a Walking Technique on Presence in Virtual Reality. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 2, 3 (Sept. 1995), 201--219. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Mel Slater and Sylvia Wilbur. 1997. A Framework for Immersive Virtual Environments Five: Speculations on the Role of Presence in Virtual Environments. 6, 6 (Dec. 1997), 603--616. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Misha Sra, Sergio Garrido-Jurado, Chris Schmandt, and Pattie Maes. 2016a. Procedurally Generated Virtual Reality from 3D Reconstructed Physical Space. In Proceedings of the 22Nd ACM Conference on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (VRST '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 191--200. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Misha Sra, Dhruv Jain, Arthur Pitzer Caetano, Andres Calvo, Erwin Hilton, and Chris Schmandt. 2016b. Resolving Spatial Variation And Allowing Spectator Participation In Multiplayer VR. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '16 Adjunct). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 221--222. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Misha Sra and Chris Schmandt. 2015. MetaSpace: Full-body Tracking for Immersive Multiperson Virtual Reality. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software & Technology (UIST '15 Adjunct). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 47--48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. STEAM. 2017. Steam Hardware & Software Survey: July 2017. http://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey. (2017). {Accessed 01-August-2017}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Frank Steinicke, Gerd Bruder, Jason Jerald, Harald Frenz, and Markus Lappe. 2010. Estimation of detection thresholds for redirected walking techniques. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 16, 1 (2010), 17--27. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Jonathan Steuer. 1992. Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. Journal of communication 42, 4 (1992), 73--93.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Haruo Takemura and Fumio Kishino. 1992. Cooperative Work Environment Using Virtual Workspace. In Proceedings of the 1992 ACM Conference on Computer-supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '92). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 226--232. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Martin Usoh, Kevin Arthur, Mary C. Whitton, Rui Bastos, Anthony Steed, Mel Slater, and Frederick P. Brooks, Jr. 1999. Walking > Walking-in-place > Flying, in Virtual Environments. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH '99). ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., New York, NY, USA, 359--364. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Mark Ward, Ronald Azuma, Robert Bennett, Stefan Gottschalk, and Henry Fuchs. 1992. A Demonstrated Optical Tracker with Scalable Work Area for Head-mounted Display Systems. In Proceedings of the 1992 Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics (I3D '92). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 43--52. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Laurie M. Wilcox, Robert S. Allison, Samuel Elfassy, and Cynthia Grelik. 2006. Personal Space in Virtual Reality. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept. 3, 4 (Oct. 2006), 412--428. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Catherine A. Zanbaka, Benjamin C. Lok, Sabarish V. Babu, Amy C. Ulinski, and Larry F. Hodges. 2005. Comparison of Path Visualizations and Cognitive Measures Relative to Travel Technique in a Virtual Environment. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 11, 6 (Nov. 2005), 694--705. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Shanyang Zhao. 2003. Toward a Taxonomy of Copresence. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 12, 5 (Oct. 2003), 445--455. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Your Place and Mine: Designing a Shared VR Experience for Remotely Located Users

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      DIS '18: Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference
      June 2018
      1418 pages
      ISBN:9781450351980
      DOI:10.1145/3196709

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 8 June 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      DIS '18 Paper Acceptance Rate107of487submissions,22%Overall Acceptance Rate1,158of4,684submissions,25%

      Upcoming Conference

      DIS '24
      Designing Interactive Systems Conference
      July 1 - 5, 2024
      IT University of Copenhagen , Denmark

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader