skip to main content
10.1145/3197391.3205441acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

transFORM - A Cyber-Physical Environment Increasing Social Interaction and Place Attachment in Underused, Public Spaces

Published:30 May 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

The emergence of social networks and apps has reduced the importance of physical space as a locus for social interaction. In response, we introduce transFORM, a cyber-physical environment installed in under-used, outdoor, public spaces. transFORM embodies our understanding of how a responsive, cyber-physical architecture can augment social relationship and increase place attachment. In this paper we critically examine the social interaction problem in the context of our increasingly digital society, present our ambition, and introduce our prototype which we will iteratively design and test. Cyber-physical interventions at large scale in public spaces are an inevitable future, and this paper serves to establish the fundamental terms of this frontier.

References

  1. A. Morrison, C. Maresa-Yee, W. Jensen, N. Eshraghi. 2016. The Humming Wall: Vibrotactile and Vibroacustic Interactions in an Urben Environment. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference, Brisbane, Australia, 818--822. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. C. Ardito, P. Buono, M. Costabile, G. Desolda. 2015. Interaction with Large Displays: A Survey. In ACM Comput. Surv. 47, 3: 46:1--46:38. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. C. Fortin, K. Hennessy, H. Sweeney. 2014. Roles of an Interactive Media Façade in a Digital Agora. In Proceedings of The International Symposium on Pervasive Displays, (June 2014), 7--12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. D. Vogel, R. Balakrishnan. 2004. Interactive public ambient displays: Transitioning from implicit to explicit, public to personal, interaction with multiple users. In Proceedings of the 17th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology (Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA, October 24 - 27, 2004.). UIST '04. ACM, New York, NY, 137--146. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. D. Williams, J. Roggenbuck. 1989. Measuring Place Attachment: Some Preliminary Results. In Abstracts of the 1989 Leisure Research Symposium. 20--24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. E. Grönvall, S. Kinch, M. G. Petersen, M. K. Rasmussen. 2014. Causing commotion with a shape-changing bench: experiencing shapechanging interfaces in use. In Proceedings of SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (May, 2014), 2559--2568. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. G. Dublon, E. Portocarrero. 2014. Listentree: Audio-Haptic Display in the Natural Environment. In Proceedings 20th International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD--2014)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. G. Pask. 1969. The Architectural Relevance Of Cybernetics. Architectural Design 39.9: 494--496. Trivedi, Deepak, et al. "Soft robotics: Biological inspiration, state of the art, and future research." Applied Bionics and Biomechanics 5.3 (2008): 99117. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. K. Easterling. 2011. The Action Is The Form. In Sentient City: Ubiquitous computing, architecture, and the future of urban space. Edited by Mark Shepard. The Architect League of New York, The MIT Press, 154--158.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. K. Grønbæk, K. Kortbek, C. Møller, J. Nielsen, L. Stenfeldt. 2012. Designing Playful Interactive Installations for Urban Environments -- The SwingScape Experience. In Advances in Computer Entertainment SE - 16, Anton Nijholt, Teresa Romão and Dennis Reidsma (eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 230--245. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. K. Oungrinis. 2006. Transformations: Paradigms for Designing Transformable Spaces. Harvard Design School, Cambridge, MA, 7--16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. L. Cuba, M. D. Hummon. 1993. A Place to Call Home: Identification with Dwellings, Community, and Region. In Sociological Quartely, 34, 111--131.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. L. Scannel, R. Gifford. 2010. Defining Place Attachment: A Tripartite Organizing Framework. In Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. L. Winner. 1999. Do artifacts have politics? In The Social Shaping of Technology (2nd. ed.), Donald MacKenzie and Judy Wajcman (Eds.). Open University Press, Buckingham, UK, 28--40.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. M. Fullilove. 1996. Psychiatric Implications of Displacement: Contributions from the Psychology of Place. In American Journal of Psychiatry, 153, 1516--1523.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. M. McLuhan.1994. Understanding Media. The MIT press, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. N. Memarovic, M. Langheinrich, F. Alt, I. Eihart, S. Hosio and E. Rubegni. 2012. Using public displays to stimulate passive engagement, active engagement, and discovery in public spaces. In Proceedings of the 4thMedia Architecture Biennale Conference, (November, 2012), 55--64. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. P. Fisher, F. Gerlach, J. Acuna, D. Pollack, I. Schäfer, J. Trautmann, E. Hornecker. 2014. Movable, Kick-/Flickable Light Fragments Eliciting Ad-hoc Interaction in Public Space. In Proceedings of The International Symposium on Pervasive Displays, (June, 2014), 50--55. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. P. Peltonen, E. Kurvinen, A. Salovaara, et al. 2008. It's Mine, Don'T Touch!: Interactions at a Large Multi-touch Display in a City Centre. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 1285--1294. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. R. Anderson. 1992. Social impacts of computing: Codes of professional ethics. Soc Sci Comput Rev 10, 2: 453--469.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. S. Sassen. 2011. Unsettling Topographic Representation. In Sentient City: Ubiquitous computing, architecture, and the future of urban space. Edited by Mark Shepard. The Architect League of New York, The MIT Press, 192--198.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. S. Schroeter, M. Foth, S. Satchell. 2012. People, content, location: sweet spotting urban screens for situated engagement. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Newcastle, England, June 11 - 15, 2012). DIS '12. ACM, New York, NY, 146--155. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. W. Mitchell. 1999. E-topia: 'Urban life, Jim -- but not as we know it'. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. W. Whyte. 1980. The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces. Project for Public Spaces. New York, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. transFORM - A Cyber-Physical Environment Increasing Social Interaction and Place Attachment in Underused, Public Spaces

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        DIS '18 Companion: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems
        May 2018
        436 pages
        ISBN:9781450356312
        DOI:10.1145/3197391

        Copyright © 2018 Owner/Author

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 30 May 2018

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • abstract

        Acceptance Rates

        DIS '18 Companion Paper Acceptance Rate107of487submissions,22%Overall Acceptance Rate1,158of4,684submissions,25%

        Upcoming Conference

        DIS '24
        Designing Interactive Systems Conference
        July 1 - 5, 2024
        IT University of Copenhagen , Denmark

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader