ABSTRACT
The emergence of social networks and apps has reduced the importance of physical space as a locus for social interaction. In response, we introduce transFORM, a cyber-physical environment installed in under-used, outdoor, public spaces. transFORM embodies our understanding of how a responsive, cyber-physical architecture can augment social relationship and increase place attachment. In this paper we critically examine the social interaction problem in the context of our increasingly digital society, present our ambition, and introduce our prototype which we will iteratively design and test. Cyber-physical interventions at large scale in public spaces are an inevitable future, and this paper serves to establish the fundamental terms of this frontier.
- A. Morrison, C. Maresa-Yee, W. Jensen, N. Eshraghi. 2016. The Humming Wall: Vibrotactile and Vibroacustic Interactions in an Urben Environment. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference, Brisbane, Australia, 818--822. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Ardito, P. Buono, M. Costabile, G. Desolda. 2015. Interaction with Large Displays: A Survey. In ACM Comput. Surv. 47, 3: 46:1--46:38. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Fortin, K. Hennessy, H. Sweeney. 2014. Roles of an Interactive Media Façade in a Digital Agora. In Proceedings of The International Symposium on Pervasive Displays, (June 2014), 7--12. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Vogel, R. Balakrishnan. 2004. Interactive public ambient displays: Transitioning from implicit to explicit, public to personal, interaction with multiple users. In Proceedings of the 17th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology (Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA, October 24 - 27, 2004.). UIST '04. ACM, New York, NY, 137--146. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Williams, J. Roggenbuck. 1989. Measuring Place Attachment: Some Preliminary Results. In Abstracts of the 1989 Leisure Research Symposium. 20--24.Google Scholar
- E. Grönvall, S. Kinch, M. G. Petersen, M. K. Rasmussen. 2014. Causing commotion with a shape-changing bench: experiencing shapechanging interfaces in use. In Proceedings of SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (May, 2014), 2559--2568. Google ScholarDigital Library
- G. Dublon, E. Portocarrero. 2014. Listentree: Audio-Haptic Display in the Natural Environment. In Proceedings 20th International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD--2014)Google Scholar
- G. Pask. 1969. The Architectural Relevance Of Cybernetics. Architectural Design 39.9: 494--496. Trivedi, Deepak, et al. "Soft robotics: Biological inspiration, state of the art, and future research." Applied Bionics and Biomechanics 5.3 (2008): 99117. Google ScholarDigital Library
- K. Easterling. 2011. The Action Is The Form. In Sentient City: Ubiquitous computing, architecture, and the future of urban space. Edited by Mark Shepard. The Architect League of New York, The MIT Press, 154--158.Google Scholar
- K. Grønbæk, K. Kortbek, C. Møller, J. Nielsen, L. Stenfeldt. 2012. Designing Playful Interactive Installations for Urban Environments -- The SwingScape Experience. In Advances in Computer Entertainment SE - 16, Anton Nijholt, Teresa Romão and Dennis Reidsma (eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 230--245. Google ScholarDigital Library
- K. Oungrinis. 2006. Transformations: Paradigms for Designing Transformable Spaces. Harvard Design School, Cambridge, MA, 7--16.Google Scholar
- L. Cuba, M. D. Hummon. 1993. A Place to Call Home: Identification with Dwellings, Community, and Region. In Sociological Quartely, 34, 111--131.Google Scholar
- L. Scannel, R. Gifford. 2010. Defining Place Attachment: A Tripartite Organizing Framework. In Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 1--10.Google ScholarCross Ref
- L. Winner. 1999. Do artifacts have politics? In The Social Shaping of Technology (2nd. ed.), Donald MacKenzie and Judy Wajcman (Eds.). Open University Press, Buckingham, UK, 28--40.Google Scholar
- M. Fullilove. 1996. Psychiatric Implications of Displacement: Contributions from the Psychology of Place. In American Journal of Psychiatry, 153, 1516--1523.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. McLuhan.1994. Understanding Media. The MIT press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- N. Memarovic, M. Langheinrich, F. Alt, I. Eihart, S. Hosio and E. Rubegni. 2012. Using public displays to stimulate passive engagement, active engagement, and discovery in public spaces. In Proceedings of the 4thMedia Architecture Biennale Conference, (November, 2012), 55--64. Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. Fisher, F. Gerlach, J. Acuna, D. Pollack, I. Schäfer, J. Trautmann, E. Hornecker. 2014. Movable, Kick-/Flickable Light Fragments Eliciting Ad-hoc Interaction in Public Space. In Proceedings of The International Symposium on Pervasive Displays, (June, 2014), 50--55. Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. Peltonen, E. Kurvinen, A. Salovaara, et al. 2008. It's Mine, Don'T Touch!: Interactions at a Large Multi-touch Display in a City Centre. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 1285--1294. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. Anderson. 1992. Social impacts of computing: Codes of professional ethics. Soc Sci Comput Rev 10, 2: 453--469.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Sassen. 2011. Unsettling Topographic Representation. In Sentient City: Ubiquitous computing, architecture, and the future of urban space. Edited by Mark Shepard. The Architect League of New York, The MIT Press, 192--198.Google Scholar
- S. Schroeter, M. Foth, S. Satchell. 2012. People, content, location: sweet spotting urban screens for situated engagement. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Newcastle, England, June 11 - 15, 2012). DIS '12. ACM, New York, NY, 146--155. Google ScholarDigital Library
- W. Mitchell. 1999. E-topia: 'Urban life, Jim -- but not as we know it'. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2--8. Google ScholarDigital Library
- W. Whyte. 1980. The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces. Project for Public Spaces. New York, New York.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- transFORM - A Cyber-Physical Environment Increasing Social Interaction and Place Attachment in Underused, Public Spaces
Recommendations
transFORM - A Cyber-Physical Artefact Augmenting Social Interaction in Residual Public Spaces
TEI '19: Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied InteractionThe emergence of social networks and apps has reduced the importance of physical space as a locus for social interaction. In response, we introduce transFORM, a cyber-physical environment installed in under-used, outdoor, public spaces. transFORM ...
Non-public eParticipation in Social Media Spaces
SMSociety '16: Proceedings of the 7th 2016 International Conference on Social Media & SocietyThis paper focuses on the importance of non-public social media spaces in contemporary democratic participation at the grassroots level, based on case studies of citizen-led, community and activist groups. The research pilots the concept of ...
Cyber Physical Society
SKG '10: Proceedings of the 2010 Sixth International Conference on Semantics, Knowledge and GridsNatural physical space provides material basis for the birth and evolution of human beings and civilization. The progress of human society has created the cyber space. With the rapid development of information technology, the cyber space is connecting ...
Comments