skip to main content
10.1145/3197768.3201530acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespetraConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Tactile sheets: using engraved paper overlays to facilitate access to a digital document's layout and logical structure

Published:26 June 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Touchscreen devices (e.g., smartphones, tablets) are a major means of accessing digital resources. However, touchscreen accessibility remains a challenge for users with visual impairments. Mainstream solutions implicitly favor a sequential navigation of digital information. This precludes users from enjoying the advantages of well laid-out, visually-structured documents, especially for certain tasks (e.g., text navigation). In this paper, we introduce tactile sheets---engraved paper sheets that represent the layout of a specific page and that are used as an overlay on a capacitive touchscreen device. Via engraved tactile patterns and textures, users can locate and discriminate different content areas, navigate the spatially-distributed content non-sequentially and access speech feedback with gestures. We report a comparative study with nine visually-impaired users that investigates the technical feasibility and the usability of this approach. Specifically, we compared a mainstream screen reader and two different types of tactile sheets. A similar level of usability is achieved between conditions. Also, participants' qualitative feedback provides strong arguments for the use of tactile pattern overlays. Finally, we introduce a processing pipeline for automatically create tactile sheets based on an existing e-book.

References

  1. John Brooke et al. 1996. SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability evaluation in industry 189, 194 (1996), 4--7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Yasmine N El-Glaly, Francis Quek, Tonya Smith-Jackson, and Gurjot Dhillon. 2013. Touch-screens are not tangible: Fusing tangible interaction with touch glass in readers for the blind. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction. ACM, 245--253. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Epilog. 2014. Zing Laser Series. https://www.epiloglaser.com/products/radius-tech-specs.htm. (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. FromTextToSpeech.com. 2017. From Text To Speech - Free online TTS service. http://www.fromtexttospeech.com/. (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Maria Giulia Cataldo and Jane Oakhill. 2000. Why are poor comprehenders inefficient searchers? An investigation into the effects of text representation and spatial memory on the ability to locate information in text. Journal of educational psychology 92, 4 (2000), 791.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Timo Götzelmann. 2016. LucentMaps: 3D printed audiovisual tactile maps for blind and visually impaired people. In Proceedings of the 18th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. ACM, 81--90. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Anhong Guo, Jeeeun Kim, Xiang'Anthony' Chen, Tom Yeh, Scott E Hudson, Jennifer Mankoff, and Jeffrey P Bigham. 2017. Facade: Auto-generating tactile interfaces to appliances. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 5826--5838. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Liang He, Zijian Wan, Leah Findlater, and Jon E Froehlich. 2017. TacTILE: A Preliminary Toolchain for Creating Accessible Graphics with 3D-Printed Overlays and Auditory Annotations. In Proceedings of the 19th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. ACM, 397--398. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Shaun K Kane, Meredith Ringel Morris, and Jacob O Wobbrock. 2013. Touchplates: low-cost tactile overlays for visually impaired touch screen users. In Proceedings of the 15th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. ACM, 22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Anne Mangen, Bente R Walgermo, and Kolbjørn Brønnick. 2013. Reading linear texts on paper versus computer screen: Effects on reading comprehension. International journal of educational research 58 (2013), 61--68.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. David McGookin, Stephen Brewster, and WeiWei Jiang. 2008. Investigating touchscreen accessibility for people with visual impairments. In Proceedings of the 5th Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction: building bridges. ACM, 298--307. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Annie Piolat, Jean-Yves Roussey, and Olivier Thunin. 1997. Effects of screen presentation on text reading and revising. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 47, 4 (1997), 565--589. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Denise Prescher, Jens Bornschein, and Gerhard Weber. 2017. Consistency of a Tactile Pattern Set. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing (TACCESS) 10, 2 (2017), 7. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Tactile sheets: using engraved paper overlays to facilitate access to a digital document's layout and logical structure

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        PETRA '18: Proceedings of the 11th PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments Conference
        June 2018
        591 pages
        ISBN:9781450363907
        DOI:10.1145/3197768

        Copyright © 2018 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 26 June 2018

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader