skip to main content
10.1145/3205230.3205240acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesasia-ccsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Systematic Market Control of Cryptocurrency Inflations

Published:22 May 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Most cryptocurrency systems mint new coins according to a predetermined rate, which contributes to inflation instead of solely by the actual demand. On the other hand, the blockchain, or whatever distributed consensus protocol underlying the cryptocurrency, can only process a limited number of transactions in a given time interval. To address both of these two issues, we propose a methodology that connects the coin minting with the prosperity of a cryptocurrency. Specifically, when there are fewer transactions, any cryptocurrency adopting our methodology will introduce a greater inflation to motivate transactions. Moreover, this methodology provides deflations and turns the currency towards a reserve of value when the network burden is too heavy.

References

  1. Iddo Bentov, Ariel Gabizon, and Alex Mizrahi. 2016. Cryptocurrencies Without Proof of Work. In 3rd Workshop on Bitcoin and Blockchain Research, in conjunction with Financial Cryptography and Data Security. Springer, 142--157.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Iddo Bentov, Charles Lee, Alex Mizrahi, and Meni Rosenfeld. 2014. Proof of Activity: Extending Bitcoin's Proof of Work via Proof of Stake {Extended Abstract}. SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review Vol. 42, 3 (2014), 34--37. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Ittay Eyal, Adem Efe Gencer, Emin Gün Sirer, and Robbert van Renesse. 2016. Bitcoin-NG: A Scalable Blockchain Protocol. In Networked Systems Design and Implementation, (NSDI). USENIX Association, 45--59. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Markus Jakobsson and Ari Juels. 1999. Proofs of Work and Bread Pudding Protocols. In IFIP Communications and Multimedia Security (CMS). Kluwer, 258--272. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Zhiqiang Liu, Shuyang Tang, Sherman S. M. Chow, Zhen Liu, and Yu Long. 2017. Fork-Free Hybrid Consensus with Flexible Proof-of-Activity. Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2017/367. (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Satoshi Nakamoto. 2008. Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System. (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. William Vickrey. 1961. Counterspeculation, Auctions, and Competitive Sealed Tenders. The Journal of Finance Vol. 16, 1 (1961), 8--37.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Systematic Market Control of Cryptocurrency Inflations

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        BCC '18: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Workshop on Blockchains, Cryptocurrencies, and Contracts
        May 2018
        69 pages
        ISBN:9781450357586
        DOI:10.1145/3205230

        Copyright © 2018 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 22 May 2018

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        BCC '18 Paper Acceptance Rate5of21submissions,24%Overall Acceptance Rate18of40submissions,45%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader