ABSTRACT
Multiprocessor supercomputers and distributed systems share many common properties in a logical sense. The physical implementation of these systems may be quite different, particularly with respect to timing considerations. Some of the recent work on supercomputer hardware and software may be of use in the distributed processing community. We discuss some aspects of how to relate program and data structures to architectural models.
- CeFe78.L. M. Censier and P. Feautrier, "A New Solution to Coherence Problems in Multicaehe Systems , " IEEE Transactions on Computers, Vol. C-27, No. 12, December 1978.]]Google Scholar
- FoOt84.G. C. Fox and S. W. Otto, "Parallel Architectures for Computer Systems, " Physics Today, Vol 37, No 5, pp. 53-66, May 1984.]]Google Scholar
- GaPK81.D. D. Gajski, D. A. Padua, D. J. Kuck, "Dependence Driven Computation", Proc. of the COMPCON 81 Spring Computer Conf., San Francisco, CA, pp. 168-172, Feb. 1981.]]Google Scholar
- GGKM83.A. Gottlieb, R. Grishman, C. Kruskal, K. McAuliffe, L. Rudolph, and M. Snir, "The NYU Uitracomputer--Designing an MIMD Shared Memory Parallel Computer" IEEE Transactions on Computers, Vol C-32, No. 2, February 1983.]]Google Scholar
- GKLS83.D Gajski, D Kuck, D. Lawrie, A. Sameh, "CEDAR--A Large Scale Multiprocessor, " Proc. of the 1983 Int'l Conf on Parallel Processing, Bellaire, MI, pp. 524-529, Aug. 1983. (Eds. H. J. Siegel & Leah Siegel)]]Google Scholar
- KKPL81.D. J. Kuck, R. H. Kuhn, D. A. Padua, B. Leasure, and M. Wolfe, "Dependence Graphs and Compiler Optimizations", Proc. of the 8th ACM Syrup. on Principles of Programming Languages" (POPL), Williamsburg, VA, pp. 207-218, Jan. 1981.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- KLCS83.D. Kuck, D. Lawrie, R. Cytron, A. Sameh, D. Gajski, "The Architecture and Programming of the Cedar System," Invited paper, Proc. of the 1983 LASL Workshop on Vector and Parallel Processing, Los Alamos, NM, Aug. 12, 1983.]]Google Scholar
- Kuck81.D~ J. Kuck, "Automatic Program Restructuring for High-Speed Computation", Invited paper, Proc. of CONPAR 81, Conf. on Analyzing Problem-Classes and Programming for Parallel Computing, Nurnberg, F o R. Germany, ed. by W. Handler, pp. 66-84, June 1981 (Springer-Verlag).]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kuck78.D. J. Kuck, The Structure of Computers and Computations, Vol. I, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., NY, 1978.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- KuGa83.D. Kuck, D. Gajski, arailel Processing of Sparse Structures, Proc. of the NATO Advanced Research Workshop on High-Speed Computation, JuliC~--FF R Cermany, pp. 229-244, June 20-22, 1983, ed. by J. S. Kowalik (Springer-Verlag) --( Series F" Computer and Systems Sciences, Vol. 7).]]Google Scholar
- ZhYe84.Chuan-Qi Zhu and Pen-Chung Yew, "A Scheme to Enforce Data Dependence on Large Multiprocessor Systems" July 17 1984 Sub. for publ. to IEEE Trans. on Software Engineering.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Supercomputers and distributed computing
Recommendations
Performance evaluation of supercomputers using HPCC and IMB benchmarks
IPDPS'06: Proceedings of the 20th international conference on Parallel and distributed processingThe HPC Challenge (HPCC) benchmark suite and the Intel MPI Benchmark (IMB) are used to compare and evaluate the combined performance of processor, memory subsystem and interconnect fabric of five leading supercomputers - SGI Altix BX2, Cray X1, Cray ...
Performance evaluation of supercomputers using HPCC and IMB Benchmarks
The HPC Challenge (HPCC) Benchmark suite and the Intel MPI Benchmark (IMB) are used to compare and evaluate the combined performance of processor, memory subsystem and interconnect fabric of five leading supercomputers-SGI Altix BX2, Cray X1, Cray ...
Comments