skip to main content
10.1145/3206129.3239419acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicemtConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Teachers' Representation in Solving Mathematical Word Problem

Authors Info & Claims
Published:02 July 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

The use of multiple representations in mathematics learning plays a vital role to help students build conceptual understanding and solve mathematical problems. Therefore, teacher's insight and view about the use of multiple representations in teaching mathematics requires more attention. The present study is aimed to investigate how representations used by mathematics teachers in solving the word problems in their teaching. The subjects for this study are junior high school teachers of mathematics. The data analysis indicated that teachers tend to use one form of representations to solve the word problem rather than use all forms in their mathematics instruction. Implications of the study finding on teachers and their practices are to be discussed.

References

  1. NCTM. 2000. Principle and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, Va.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. National Research Council and Mathematics Learning Study Committee. 2001. Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. National Academies Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Hanich, B. L. and Jordan, C. N. 2004. Achievement-Related Beliefs of Third-Grade Children With Mathematics and Reading Difficulties. J. Educ. Res., 97, 5, 227--234.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Powell, S. R., Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Cirino, P. T., and Fletcher, J. M. 2009. Do word-problem features differentially affect problem difficulty as a function of students' mathematics difficulty with and without reading difficulty?. J. Learn. Disabil., 42, 2, (March/April. 2009), 99--110.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Goldin, G. 2002. Representation in mathematical learning and problem solving. Handb. Int. Res. Math. Educ., no. 10872, 197--218.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Ainsworth, S. 2006. DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learn. Instr., 16, 3, 183--198.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Hwang, W. Y., Chen, N. S., Dung, J. J., and Yang, Y. L. 2007. Multiple representation skills and creativity effects on mathematical problem solving using a multimedia whiteboard system. Educ. Technol. Soc., 10, 2, 191--212.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Lin, Y. H., Wilson, M., and Cheng, C. L. 2013. An investigation of the nature of the influences of item stem and option representation on student responses to a mathematics test. Eur. J. Psychol. Educ., 28, 4, 1141--1161.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Durkaya, M., Şenel, E. Ö., Öçal, M. F., Kaplan, A., Aksu, Z., and Konyaloglu, A. C. 2011. Pre-service mathematics teachers' multiple representation competencies about determinant concept. in Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 2554--2558.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Cai, J. 2009. U.S. and Chinese Teachers' Constructing, Knowing, and Evaluating Representations to Teach Mathematics. Math. Think. Learn., 7, 2 (Nov 2009), 135--169.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Preety N. Tripathi. 2008. Developing Mathematical Understanding through Multiple Representations. Math. Teach. Middle Sch., 13, 8, 438--445.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Goldin, G. and Shteingold, N. 2001. Systems of Representations and the Development of Mathematical Concepts. In A.A. Cuoco, & F.R. Curcio (Eds.). in The Role of Representation in School Mathematics, Reston: NCTM Publication, pp. 1--24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Fosnot, C. and Dolk, M. 2002. Young mathematicians at work. Constructing fractions, decimals and percents.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Ng, F. S. and Lee, K. 2009. The Model Method: Singapore Children's Tool for Representing and Solving Algebraic Word Problems. J. Res. Math. Educ., 40, 3 (May. 2009), 282--313.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. 2003. the Didactical Use of Models in Realistic. Educ. Stud. Math., 54, 9--35.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Cobb, P., Yacel, E., and Wood, T. 1992. A Constructivist Alternative to the Representational View of Mind in Mathematics Education. J. Res. Math. Educ., 23, 1 (Jan. 1992), 2--33.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Stylianou, D. A. 2010. Teachers' conceptions of representation in middle school mathematics. J. Math. Teach. Educ., 13, 4, 325--343 (Feb. 2010), 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Son, J.-W. and Lee, J.-E. 2016. Pre-service Teachers' Understanding of Fraction Multiplication, Representational Knowledge, and Computational Skills. Math. Teach. Educ. Dev., 182 (August. 2016), 5--28.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Loewenberg Ball, D., Thames, M. H., and Phelps, G. 2008. Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special?. J. Teach. Educ., 59, 5 (Nov. 2008), 389--407.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Izsák, A. 2008. Mathematical knowledge for teaching fraction multiplication. Cogn. Instr., 26, 1 (Jan. 2008), 95--143.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Choike, J. R. 2000. Teaching Strategies for 'Algebra for All, 93, 7 (Oct. 2000), 556--560.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Teachers' Representation in Solving Mathematical Word Problem

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICEMT '18: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Education and Multimedia Technology
      July 2018
      127 pages
      ISBN:9781450365253
      DOI:10.1145/3206129

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      © 2018 Association for Computing Machinery. ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor or affiliate of a national government. As such, the Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government purposes only.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 2 July 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader