skip to main content
10.1145/3207677.3278034acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescsaeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Printing Orientation Optimization of 3D Model

Authors Info & Claims
Published:22 October 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

The print 1orientation of the model of 3D printing determines the direction of additive manufacturing process and has a direct influence on the model accuracy and printing efficiency. Based on this problem, this article taken volumes error caused by stair-step-effect, the number of suspension added, the print time of model as optimal objectives and establish an optimization model of which the solution algorithm is designed by using both genetic algorithm and simulated annealing algorithm. After much testing, this designed algorithm has been proved significantly efficient in obtaining optimal solutions and is able to be applied to 3D printing system. The method introduced in this article is more superior in comparison with traditional method.

References

  1. S. H. Masood, W. Rattanawong, and P. lovenitti. 2000. Part Build Orientations Based on Volumetric Error in Fused Deposition Modelling. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, London, 16, 162--168, February.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. J. Hong, D. L. Wu, D. C. Li, and B. H. Lu. Multi-Objective Optimization of the Part Building Orientation in Stereolithography. Journal of Xian Jiao tong University, Xi'an, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 506--509, May 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. W. G. Zhang, and Z. L. Li. Multi-objective optimization model for fabrication orientation. Journal of Chang'an University (Natural Science Edition), Xi'an, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 104--106, September 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Z. H. Zhang, A. J. Li, J. Y. Yang, G. D. Hao, and H. Wang. Optimization Method to Fabrication Orientation of Parts in Rapid Prototyping Based on Genetic Algorithm. Journal of Donghua University (Natural Science), Shanghai, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 376--380, August 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. T. Dong, W. Y. Zhang, and C. H. Wang. New Optimizing Procedures of Part-building Orientation for Rapid Prototyping Manufacturing. Computer Engineering and Applications. Beijing, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 45--48, January 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. J. B. Zhao, L. Y. He, W. J. Liu, and H. Y. Bian. Optimization of Part-Building Orientation for Rapid Prototyping Manufacturing. Journal of Computer-aided Design & Computer Graphics, Beijing, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 456--463, March 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. W. Cheng, J. Y. H. Fuh, A.Y.C. Nee, Y. S. Wong, H. T. Loh, and T. Miyazawa. Multi-objective optimization of part-building orientation in stereolithography. Rapid Prototyping Journal, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 12--23, April 1995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. P. T. Lan, S. Y. Chou, L. L. Chen, and D. Gemmill. Determining fabrication orientations for rapid prototyping with Stereolithography apparatus. Computer-Aided Design, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 53--62, January 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Y. Li, and J. Zhang. Multi-criteria GA-based Pareto Optimization of Building Direction for Rapid Prototyping. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Springer, Berlin, vol. 69, no. 5--8, pp. 1819--1831, November 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. K. D. Chu, A. Lamaze, and K. Murphy. 3D printed rapid disaster response{C}. IEEE International Symposium on Technologies for Homeland Security, IEEE, 2014:91180B.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Printing Orientation Optimization of 3D Model

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      CSAE '18: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computer Science and Application Engineering
      October 2018
      1083 pages
      ISBN:9781450365123
      DOI:10.1145/3207677

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 22 October 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      CSAE '18 Paper Acceptance Rate189of383submissions,49%Overall Acceptance Rate368of770submissions,48%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader