skip to main content
10.1145/3207677.3278087acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescsaeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Optimization of Train Control Strategy for Energy Saving and Time Precision Using Multi-Objective Cuckoo Search Algorithm

Authors Info & Claims
Published:22 October 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

In1 this paper, multi-objective optimization problem of train operation is discussed. The optimization model of train operation is established subject to security, stop position, passenger comfort level with energy consumption and running time regarded as the optimization indexes. Incorporated with leader selection strategy, basic cuckoo search algorithm is expanded to solve optimization problem with multiple objectives. On the basis of line information and management condition, the multiple objective cuckoo search algorithm is applied to calculate the train optimization model, and a set of balanced running control strategies is obtained after calculation. The simulation result shows that by applying the balanced strategy to train operation optimization problem, energy consumption is reduced by 10.1%-30.4% while guaranteeing running time is less than scheduled time, stop position and comfort level also achieve satisfied result. Then it's verified that improved algorithm can handle running situation with speed limit in section.

References

  1. Mao BH, and He TJ. 2000. A general-purposed simulation system on train movement. Journal of The China Railway Society, 22, 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. He HY, and Zhu JL. 2000. Design of Software for Traction Calculation and Operation Schematic Diagram of Trains. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 22, 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. YU J, Zheng HY, and Qian QQ. 2010. Study on Multi-objective Train Control Based on Hybrid Particle Swarm Optimization. Journal of The China Railway Society, 32, 38--42.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Tang T, and Xun J. 2016. Research on energy-efficient driving strategy in Beijing Yizhuang line. Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University, 40, 19--24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Lin C, Fang XQ, Zhao X, Zhang Q, and Liu X. 2017. Study on energy-saving optimization of train coasting control based on multi-population Genetic Algorithm. 2017 3rd International Conference on Control, Automation and Robotics(ICCAR), Nagoya, 627--632.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Lu S, Yang J, Xue F, Ting TO, and Zhu H. 2017. Partial speed trajectory optimization for urban rail vehicles with considerations on motor efficiency. 2017 IEEE 20th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems(ITSC), Yokohama, 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. YU J, Zheng HY, and Qian QQ. 2009. Study on Multi-objective Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm Based on Preference. Control and Decision, 24, 66--70.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Yang X S, and Deb S. 2010. Cuckoo Search via Levy Flights. Mathematics. 210--214.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. FU Q, GE HW, and SU SZ. 2016. Particle swarm optimization algorithm with firefly behavior and Levy flight. Journal of Computer Applications, 36, 3298--3302.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Zitzler E, and Thiele L. 1999. Multi-objective evolutionary algorithms: a comparative case study and the strength Pareto approach. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 3, 257--271. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Optimization of Train Control Strategy for Energy Saving and Time Precision Using Multi-Objective Cuckoo Search Algorithm

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      CSAE '18: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computer Science and Application Engineering
      October 2018
      1083 pages
      ISBN:9781450365123
      DOI:10.1145/3207677

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 22 October 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      CSAE '18 Paper Acceptance Rate189of383submissions,49%Overall Acceptance Rate368of770submissions,48%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader