skip to main content
10.1145/3207719.3207722acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesscopesConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Reinforcement Learning for Power-Efficient Grant Prediction in LTE

Authors Info & Claims
Published:28 May 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Reducing the energy consumption of mobile phones is a major concern in the design of cellular modem solutions for LTE and 5G standards. Apart from optimizing hardware for power efficiency, dynamic power management, i.e., powering down idle system components, is a crucial means to achieve this goal. The techniques proposed so far, however, are reactive rather than proactive. This leads to the inability to exploit a significant amount of opportunities to power down components, as the opportunity is recognized too late. We propose a dynamic power management technique that is capable of exploiting said opportunities through the application of reinforcement learning prediction techniques for proactive power management. However, the additional computational effort for prediction algorithms must be carefully analyzed and taken into account. Therefore, we investigate which conditions have to be met in order to achieve net energy savings. The proposed technique has been implemented and evaluated for potential savings on simulated traces of LTE data. The resulting predictor is designed to be trained online, without any prior system knowledge. For a fair evaluation and comparison, the power consumption of the training phase is also considered in the analysis. It is shown that energy savings of up to 23.9 % may be obtained on a modem for scenarios such as HTTP streaming.

References

  1. 2016. ns-3. https://www.nsnam.org/. (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Omer Anjum, Tapani Ahonen, Fabio Garzia, Jari Nurmi, Claudio Brunelli, and Heikki Berg. 2011. State of the art baseband DSP platforms for Software Defined Radio: A survey. EURASIP JWCN 2011, 1 (2011), 5.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Nicola Baldo. 2011. The ns-3 LTE module by the LENA project. (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Luca Benini, Alessandro Bogliolo, and Giovanni De Micheli. 2000. A survey of design techniques for system-level dynamic power management. IEEE transactions on VLSI systems 8, 3 (2000), 299--316. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Sourjya Bhaumik, Shoban Preeth Chandrabose, Manjunath Kashyap Jataprolu, Gautam Kumar, Anand Muralidhar, Paul Polakos, Vikram Srinivasan, and Thomas Woo. 2012. CloudIQ: A framework for processing base stations in a data center. In Proceedings of the 18th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking. ACM, 125--136. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Peter Brand, Jonathan Ah Sue, Johannes Brendel, Joachim Falk, Ralph Hasholzner, Jürgen Teich, and Stefan Wildermann. 2017. Exploiting Predictability in Dynamic Network Communication for Power-Efficient Data Transmission in LTE Radio Systems. In Proceedings of the 20th International Workshop on Software and Compilers for Embedded Systems. ACM, 64--67. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Xiaomeng Chen, Jiayi Meng, Y Charlie Hu, Maruti Gupta, Ralph Hasholzner, Venkatesan Nallampatti Ekambaram, Ashish Singh, and Srikathyayani Srikanteswara. 2017. A Fine-grained Event-based Modem Power Model for Enabling In-depth Modem Energy Drain Analysis. Proceedings of the ACM on Measurement and Analysis of Computing Systems 1, 2 (2017), 45. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Eui-Young Chung, Luca Benini, and Giovanni De Micheli. 1999. Dynamic power management using adaptive learning tree. In Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE/ACM international conference on Computer-aided design. IEEE Press, 274--279. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Denis C Daly, Laura C Fujino, and Kenneth C Smith. 2017. Through the Looking Glass--The 2017 Edition: Trends in Solid-State Circuits from ISSCC. IEEE Solid-State Circuits Magazine 9, 1 (2017), 12--22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Gaurav Dhiman and Tajana Simunic Rosing. 2006. Dynamic Power Management Using Machine Learning. In Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-aided Design (ICCAD '06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 747--754. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. J. Falk, C. Haubelt, and J. Teich. 2006. Efficient Representation and Simulation of Model-Based Designs in SystemC. In Proc. FDL (Sep. 19-22) (EDL'06). 129--134.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Stefanos Kaxiras, Girija Narlikar, Alan D Berenbaum, and Zhigang Hu. 2001. Comparing power consumption of an SMT and a CMP DSP for mobile phone workloads. In Proceedings of the 2001 international conference on Compilers, architecture, and synthesis for embedded systems. ACM, 211--220. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Robin Kravets and Parameshwaran Krishnan. 2000. Application-driven power management for mobile communication. Wireless Networks 6, 4 (July 2000), 263--277. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. S-B Lee, Ioannis Pefkianakis, Adam Meyerson, Shugong Xu, and Songwu Lu. 2009. Proportional fair frequency-domain packet scheduling for 3GPP LTE uplink. In INFOCOM 2009, IEEE. IEEE, 2611--2615.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. James MacGlashan. 2017. Burlap: Brown-UMBC reinforcement learning and planning. http://burlap.cs.brown.edu/. (2017). Accessed: 2017-11-3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. S. Mannor, B. Kveton, S. Siddiqi, and C. Yu. 2006. Machine learning for adaptive power management. Autonomic Computing 10, 4 (2006), 299--312.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Rafael Rosales, Michael Glass, Jürgen Teich, Bo Wang, Yang Xu, and Ralph Hasholzner. 2014. MAESTRO-holistic actor-oriented modeling of nonfunctional properties and firmware behavior for MPSoCs. ACM Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Systems (TODAES) 19, 3 (2014), 23. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Gavin A Rummery and Mahesan Niranjan. 1994. On-line Q-learning using connectionist systems. Vol. 37. University of Cambridge, Department of Engineering.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Einar Cesar Santos. 2017. A Simple Reinforcement Learning Mechanism for Resource Allocation in LTE-A Networks with Markov Decision Process and Q-Learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.09312 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Stefania Sesia, Matthew Baker, and Issam Toufik. 2011. LTE-the UMTS long term evolution: from theory to practice. John Wiley & Sons. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Iraj Sodagar. 2011. The mpeg-dash standard for multimedia streaming over the internet. IEEE MultiMedia 18, 4 (2011), 62--67. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Mani B Srivastava, Anantha P Chandrakasan, and Robert W Brodersen. 1996. Predictive system shutdown and other architectural techniques for energy efficient programmable computation. IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems 4, 1 (1996), 42--55. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Jonathan Ah Sue, Ralph Hasholzner, Johannes Brendel, Martin Kleinsteuber, and Jüergen Teich. 2016. A binary time series model of LTE scheduling for machine learning prediction. In Foundations and Applications of Self* Systems, IEEE International Workshops on. IEEE, 269--270.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Bo Wang, Yang Xu, Ralph Hasholzner, Rafael Rosales, Michael Glaß, and Jürgen Teich. 2014. End-to-end power estimation for heterogeneous cellular LTE SoCs in early design phases. In Power and Timing Modeling, Optimization and Simulation (PATMOS), 2014 24th International Workshop on. IEEE, 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Yanzhi Wang, Qing Xie, Ahmed Ammari, and Massoud Pedram. 2011. Deriving a Near-optimal Power Management Policy Using Model-free Reinforcement Learning and Bayesian Classification. In Proceedings of the 48th Design Automation Conference (DAC '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 41--46. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Christopher JCH Watkins and Peter Dayan. 1992. Q-learning. Machine learning 8, 3-4 (1992), 279--292.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Zhiyuan Xu, Yanzhi Wang, Jian Tang, Jing Wang, and Mustafa Cenk Gursoy. 2017. A deep reinforcement learning based framework for power-efficient resource allocation in cloud RANs. In Communications (ICC), 2017 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Reinforcement Learning for Power-Efficient Grant Prediction in LTE

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          SCOPES '18: Proceedings of the 21st International Workshop on Software and Compilers for Embedded Systems
          May 2018
          120 pages
          ISBN:9781450357807
          DOI:10.1145/3207719

          Copyright © 2018 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 28 May 2018

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate38of79submissions,48%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader