skip to main content
10.1145/3208903.3208940acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagese-energyConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Data-Driven Models for Building Occupancy Estimation

Published:12 June 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

The availability of accurate occupancy information from different spaces in a building allows for significant reduction in the energy consumption of heating, ventilation, air conditioning, and lighting systems. This paper investigates the application of particle filters and time series neural networks to inferring the number of occupants of individual rooms from time series data collected by a set of occupancy-indicative sensors. Our approach is purely data driven and does not require developing customized and complex physics-based models to predict the occupancy level of the many rooms in a building. We evaluate the efficacy of the proposed methods on two data sets, one contains measurements of dedicated sensors while the other one contains measurements of HVAC sensors that are commonly available in commercial buildings. Our results indicate that time series neural networks are superior in this application, estimating the number of occupants with a root-mean-squared error of 0.3 and 0.8 in the two data sets with a maximum of 7 and 67 occupants, respectively.

References

  1. Yuvraj Agarwal, Bharathan Balaji, Seemanta Dutta, Rajesh K. Gupta, and Thomas Weng. 2011. Duty-cycling buildings aggressively: The next frontier in HVAC control. In Proc. 10th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN). ACM/IEEE, 246--257.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Omid Ardakanian, Arka Bhattacharya, and David Culler. 2016. Non-intrusive techniques for establishing occupancy related energy savings in commercial buildings. In Proc. 3rd International Conference on Systems for Energy-Efficient Built Environments (BuildSys). ACM, 21--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Irvan B Arief-Ang, Flora D Salim, and Margaret Hamilton. 2017. DA-HOC: Semi-Supervised Domain Adaptation for Room Occupancy Prediction using CO2 Sensor Data. In Proc. 4th International Conference on Systems for Energy-Efficient Built Environments (BuildSys). ACM, In Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Neal Master Jay Taneja David Culler Aswani, Anil and Claire Tomlin. 2012. Reducing transient and steady state electricity consumption in HVAC using learning-based model-predictive control. Proc. IEEE 100, 1 (Jan. 2012), 240--253.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Luis M. Candanedo, VÃľronique Feldheim, and Dominique Deramaix. 2017. A methodology based on Hidden Markov Models for occupancy detection and a case study in a low energy residential building. Energy and Buildings 148, Supplement C (2017), 327--341.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Wen-Kuei Chang and Tianzhen Hong. 2013. Statistical analysis and modeling of occupancy patterns in open-plan offices using measured lighting-switch data. Building Simulation 6, 1 (Mar. 2013), 23--32.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Georg Dorffner. 1996. Neural networks for time series processing. 6 (1996), 447--468.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Varick L. Erickson, Stefan Achleitner, and Alberto E. Cerpa. 2013. POEM: Power-efficient occupancy-based energy management system. In Proc. 12th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN). ACM/IEEE, 203--216. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Varick L. Erickson, Miguel Á. Carreira-Perpinán, and Alberto E. Cerpa. 2011. OBSERVE: Occupancy-based system for efficient reduction of HVAC energy. In Proc. 10th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN). ACM/IEEE, 258--269.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Florian Fiebig, Sebastian Kochanneck, Ingo Mauser, and Hartmut Schmeck. 2017. Detecting occupancy in smart buildings by data fusion from low-cost sensors: poster description. In Proc. 8th International Conference on Future Energy Systems (e-Energy). ACM, 259--261. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Sunil K. Ghai, Lakshmi V. Thanayankizil, Deva P. Seetharam, and Dipanjan Chakraborty. 2012. Occupancy detection in commercial buildings using opportunistic context sources. In Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops. IEEE, 463--466.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Qie Hu, Frauke Oldewurtel, Maximilian Balandat, Evangelos Vrettos, Datong Zhou, and Claire J Tomlin. 2016. Building model identification during regular operation - empirical results and challenges. In Proc. American Control Conference. 605--610.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Ming Jin, Nikolaos Bekiaris-Liberis, Kevin Weekly, Costas Spanos, and Alexandre Bayen. 2015. Sensing by Proxy: Occupancy Detection Based on Indoor CO2 Concentration. In Proc. 9th International Conference on Mobile Ubiquitous Computing, Systems, Services and Technologies. 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. KIT. Accessed Jan. 2018. KIT Energy Smart Home Lab. Online https://github.com/aifb/eshl-occupancy/. (Accessed Jan. 2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. MATLAB. 2018. Toolbox for TSNN. Online https://www.mathworks.com/help/nnet/modeling-and-prediction-with-narx-and-time-delay-networks.html. (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Jorge J Moré. 1978. The Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm: Implementation and theory. In Numerical analysis. Springer, 105--116.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Bill Von Neida, Dorene Manicria, and Allan Tweed. 2001. An Analysis of the Energy and Cost Savings Potential of Occupancy Sensors for Commercial Lighting Systems. Illuminating Engineering Society 30, 2 (2001), 111--125.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Jose Luis Gomez Ortega, Liangxiu Han, and Nicholas Bowring. 2016. A novel dynamic hidden semi-Markov model (D-HSMM) for occupancy pattern detection from sensor data stream. In Proc. 8th IFIP International Conference on New Technologies, Mobility and Security (NTMS). 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Yuzhen Peng, Adam Rysanek, Zoltán Nagy, and Arno Schlüter. 2018. Using machine learning techniques for occupancy-prediction-based cooling control in office buildings. Applied Energy 211 (2018), 1343--1358.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Luis Pérez-Lombard, José Ortiz, and Christine Pout. 2008. A review on buildings energy consumption information. Energy and Buildings 40, 3 (2008), 394--398.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Fisayo C. Sangogboye, Krzysztof Arendt, Ashok Singh, Christian T. Veje, Mikkel Baun Kjærgaard, and Bo Nørregaard Jørgensen. 2017. Performance comparison of occupancy count estimation and prediction with common versus dedicated sensors for building model predictive control. Building Simulation 10, 6 (Dec. 2017), 829--843.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Sebastian Thrun, Wolfram Burgard, and Dieter Fox. 2005. Probabilistic Robotics (Intelligent Robotics and Autonomous Agents). The MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Amee Trivedi, Jeremy Gummeson, David Irwin, Deepak Ganesan, and Prashant Shenoy. 2017. iSchedule: Campus-scale HVAC scheduling via mobile WiFi monitoring. In Proc. 8th International Conference on Future Energy Systems (e-Energy). ACM, 132--142. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. United Nations Environmental Programme, Sustainable Buildings and Climate Initiative. 2009. Buildings and climate change: Summary for decision-makers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Datong P. Zhou, Qie Hu, and Claire Tomlin. 2017. Quantitative comparison of data-driven and physics-based models for commercial building HVAC systems. In Proc. American Control Conference. 2900--2906.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Data-Driven Models for Building Occupancy Estimation

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        e-Energy '18: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Future Energy Systems
        June 2018
        657 pages
        ISBN:9781450357678
        DOI:10.1145/3208903

        Copyright © 2018 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 12 June 2018

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate160of446submissions,36%

        Upcoming Conference

        E-Energy '24

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader