research-article

Involving Customers in Requirements Engineering Education: Mind the Goals!

Authors:

Martina Müller-Amthor,

Yvonne SedelmaierAuthors Info & Claims

ECSEE '18: Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference of Software Engineering Education

Pages 113 - 121

https://doi.org/10.1145/3209087.3209105

Published: 14 June 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Good requirements are an essential prerequisite for successful IT projects. Consequently, IT students should already be exposed to requirements-related intricacies at universities. Some authors argue that requirements engineering education should include an external customer for making things more tangible and realistic. In this paper, we present and analyze two learning settings involving such a customer that we used at our universities for several years.

The main contribution of this paper lies in identifying significant differences in how customers may be involved in requirements engineering education. Although the two settings look quite similar at first sight, a detailed analysis reveals important differences that are rooted in different intended learning outcomes. Consequently, there is no single "ideal" setting, not even for involving a customer in requirements engineering education, which stands out against the others. Besides, no such setting may be used as a best practice right away without paying crucial attention to the context and, in particular, the underlying intended learning outcomes.

References

[1]

C. Gold-Veerkamp, J. Abke, and I. Diethelm. 2017. What about Misconceptions in Software Engineering? In Proceedings of the 8th IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON2017), 704--708.

[2]

S. Ouhbi, A. Idri, J. L. Fernández-Alemán, and A. Toval. 2015. Requirements Engineering Education: a Systematic Mapping Study. Requirements Engineering Journal 20, 2, 119--138.

Digital Library

[3]

D. Zowghi and S. Payani. 2013. Teaching Requirements Engineering through Role Playing; Lessons Learnt. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Requirements Engineering (RE '03), 233--241.

Digital Library

[4]

K. Sikkel and M. Daneva. 2011. Getting the Client into the Loop in Information System Modelling Courses. In Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Requirements Engineering Education and Training (REET '11), 1--4.

[5]

G. Gabrysiak, H. Giese, A. Seibel, and S. Neumann. 2010. Teaching Requirements Engineering with Virtual Stakeholders without Software Engineering Knowledge. In Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Requirements Engineering Education and Training (REET '10), 36--45.

[6]

M. Daun, A. Salmon, T. Weyer, K. Pohl, and B. Tenbergen. 2016. Project-based Learning with Examples from Industry in University Courses: An Experience Report from an Undergraduate Requirements Engineering Course. In Proceedings of the 29th Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training (CSEET '16), 184--193.

[7]

G. Regev, D.C. Gause, and A. Wegmann. 2009. Experiential learning approach for requirements engineering education. Requirements Engineering Journal 14, 269--287

Digital Library

[8]

G. Regev, D. C. Gause, and A. Wegmann. 2008. Requirements Engineering Education in the 21st Century, an Experiential Learning Approach. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Requirements Engineering (RE '08), 85--94.

Digital Library

[9]

S. Ludi. 2007. Introducing Accessibility Requirements Through External Stakeholder Utilization in an Undergraduate Requirements Engineering Course. In Proceedings on the 29th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE'07), 736--743.

Digital Library

[10]

M. Buckley, H. Kershener, K. Schindler, C. Alphonce, and J. Braswell. 2004. Benefits of Using Socially-Relevant Projects in Computer Science and Engineering Education. In Proceedings of the SIG on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE'04), 482--486.

Digital Library

[11]

P. Figas, G. Hagel, and A. Bartel. 2013. The Furtherance of Motivation in the Context of Teaching Software Engineering. In Proceedings of the 4th Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON '13), 1299--1304.

[12]

G. Gabrysiak, H. Giese, and A. Seibel. 2011. Why Should I Help You to Teach Requirements Engineering. In Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Requirements Engineering Education and Training (REET '11).

[13]

J. V. Harrison. 1997. Enhancing Software Development Project Courses via Industry Participation. In Proceedings of the 10th Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training (CSEET '97), 192--203.

Digital Library

[14]

B. Brügge and M. Gluchow. 2012. Towards Production Ready Software in Project Courses with Real Clients. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Software Engineering Education based on Real World Experiences (EduRex '12), 5--8.

Digital Library

[15]

G. Gabrysiak, M. Guentert, R. Hebig, and H. Giese. 2012. Teaching Requirements Engineering with Authentic Stakeholders: Towards a Scalable Course Setting. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Software Engineering Education based on Real World Experiences (EduRex '12), 1--4.

Digital Library

[16]

G. Hagel, J. Mottok, and M. Müller-Amthor. 2013. Drei Feedback-Zyklen in der Software Engineering-Ausbildung durch erweitertes Just-in-Time-Teaching. In Tagungsband des 13. Workshops Software Engineering im Unterricht der Hochschulen (SEUH 2013).

[17]

Y. Sedelmaier and D. Landes. 2014. A Multi-Level Didactical Approach to Build up Competencies in Requirements Engineering. In Proceedings of the 8th Workshop on Requirements Engineering Education and Training (REET '14).

[18]

Y. Sedelmaier and D. Landes. 2017. Experiences in Teaching and Learning Requirements Engineering on a Sound Didactical Basis. In Proceedings of the 22nd Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE 2017), 116--121.

Digital Library

[19]

B. Penzenstadler, M. Mahaux, and P. Heymans. 2013. University Meets Industry: Calling in Real Stakeholders. In Proceedings of the 26th Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training (CSEET'13), 1--10.

[20]

Y. Sedelmaier and D. Landes. 2014. A Multi-Perspective Framework for Evaluating Software Engineering Education by Assessing Students' Competencies. In Proceedings of the 44th Conference on Frontiers in Education (FIE '14), 2065--2072.

[21]

Y. Sedelmaier and D. Landes. 2016. Evaluating Didactical Approaches Based upon Students' Competences. In Proceedings of the 7th Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON '16), 527--536.

[22]

W. Bender, S. Lerch, and M. Scheffel. 2014. Interdisziplinäre Kompetenzen Studierender evaluieren. 2. Zwischenbericht der Wissenschaftlichen Begleitstudie zum Projekt "Der Coburger Weg" zum 31.05.2014, Hochschule Coburg.

[23]

C. Rupp. 2009. Requirements-Engineering und -Management, 5. ed., Carl Hanser Verlag, München, 86.

[24]

J.A. Comenius. 1973. Didactica Magna. In Ausgewählte Werke. Band 1, K. Schaller (Ed.), Olms, Hildesheim 1973, 82.

[25]

J. Dewey. 1978. Education. In The Middle Works of John Dewey, 1899--1924. Vol. 6, Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, 426--450.

[26]

J. Robertson and S. Robertson. 2011. Mastering the Requirements Process. 2nd ed., Addison Wesley, Westford, USA, 93--134.

Digital Library

Cited By

Daun MGrubb AStenkova VTenbergen B(2022)A systematic literature review of requirements engineering educationRequirements Engineering10.1007/s00766-022-00381-928:2(145-175)Online publication date: 19-May-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s00766-022-00381-9
Daun MGrubb ATenbergen B(2021)A Survey of Instructional Approaches in the Requirements Engineering Education Literature2021 IEEE 29th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE)10.1109/RE51729.2021.00030(257-268)Online publication date: Sep-2021
https://doi.org/10.1109/RE51729.2021.00030

Index Terms

Involving Customers in Requirements Engineering Education: Mind the Goals!
1. Social and professional topics
  1. Professional topics
    1. Computing education
      1. Computing education programs
        Software engineering education
2. Software and its engineering
  1. Software creation and management
    1. Designing software
      1. Requirements analysis

Recommendations

Improving requirements elicitation in large-scale software projects with reduced customer engagement: a proposed cost-effective model
Abstract
Effective requirements elicitation is crucial for the success of large-scale software projects. However, challenges arise when customers are unavailable or unable to express their needs clearly. This research presents a cost-effective model to ...
An agile requirements elicitation approach based on NFRs and business process models for micro-businesses
Profes '11: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Product Focused Software Development and Process Improvement

Software empowers micro-businesses to be more competitive - be it accounting software, point-of-sales software, e-commerce software, and the like. Before having such software, micro-businesses must express their requirements properly to the software ...
Secure Tropos framework for software product lines requirements engineering

Security and requirements engineering are two of the most important factors of success in the development of a software product line (SPL). Goal-driven security requirements engineering approaches, such as Secure Tropos, have been proposed as a suitable ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences

ECSEE '18: Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference of Software Engineering Education

June 2018

140 pages

ISBN:9781450363839

DOI:10.1145/3209087

Conference Chair:
Jürgen Mottok
OTH Regensburg

Copyright © 2018 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

In-Cooperation

GI: Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V.
SIGSOFT: ACM Special Interest Group on Software Engineering

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 14 June 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Funding Sources

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung

Conference

ECSEE'18

ECSEE'18: European Conference of Software Engineering Education 2018

June 14 - 15, 2018

Seeon/ Bavaria, Germany

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 11 of 16 submissions, 69%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

2
Total Citations
View Citations
117
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)0
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Daun MGrubb AStenkova VTenbergen B(2022)A systematic literature review of requirements engineering educationRequirements Engineering10.1007/s00766-022-00381-928:2(145-175)Online publication date: 19-May-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s00766-022-00381-9
Daun MGrubb ATenbergen B(2021)A Survey of Instructional Approaches in the Requirements Engineering Education Literature2021 IEEE 29th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE)10.1109/RE51729.2021.00030(257-268)Online publication date: Sep-2021
https://doi.org/10.1109/RE51729.2021.00030

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Figures

Tables

Media

View Table of Conten