ABSTRACT
There is currently much discussion and research on topics such as open access, alternative publishing models, semantic publishing, peer review, data sharing, reproducible science, etc.; in short, how we can bring scholarly publishing in line with modern technologies and expectations.
In the past, the document engineering community's participation in defining the future directions has been rather limited, which is surprising, as many document-centric issues related to scientific publishing still remain unresolved. Therefore, the main goal of this workshop, which will be held at DocEng 2018, is to stimulate discussion on this topic among experts in the document engineering field and provide a forum for the exchange of ideas.
The second goal of the workshop is more hands-on: for generating the Post-Proceedings, we will be trialling a new workflow, which is based on some of the technologies discussed. The results will be reported to the DocEng Steering Committee and recommendations will be made future conferences.
- Tamir Hassan. 2010. User-Guided Information Extraction from Print-Oriented Documents. Ph.D. Dissertation. Technische Universität Wien.Google Scholar
- Michael Piotrowski. 2016. Future Publishing Formats. In DocEng 2016: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Symposium on Document Engineering. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Michael Wybrow. 2013. Reimagining digital publishing for technical documents. In DocEng 2013: Proceedings of the 2013 ACM Symposium on Document Engineering. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Workshop on the Future of Scholarly Publishing
Recommendations
Russian Scholarly Papers in Open-Access Megajournals
AbstractThe quantity, research topics, and growth rates are assessed for Russian scholarly papers published in open-access megajournals. Russian papers published in PLoS ONE in 2006–2019 are analyzed on the basis of international scientometric indicators. ...
Future Publishing Formats
DocEng '16: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Symposium on Document EngineeringThe familiar PDF-based scholarly publishing workflow-which emulates even earlier paper-based workflows-has been surprisingly resistent to change. However, it is becoming increasingly clear that it no longer meets the requirements of a quickly evolving ...
Scholarly impact measurements of LIS open access journals: based on citations and links
Purpose -- The main purpose of this paper is to measure the scholarly impact of LIS (Library and Information Science) open access journals (OA journals), most of which are not indexed by the Web of Science (WoS). In addition, the paper seeks to discuss ...
Comments