skip to main content
10.1145/3209415.3209509acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicegovConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Towards Health Sector Web Presence Assessment: Defining Criteria and Indicators

Authors Info & Claims
Published:04 April 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

A key element in the evolution of hospital services through the Internet is the development of websites that better serve the patients' needs. It imposes a high challenge on health sector organisations to have objective methods to evaluate their web presence. Health sector website assessment is built on identifying relative evaluation dimensions and conceived measurements of health sector websites services. In this paper, which is part of a research study to implement a health sector web presence assessment instrument, the instrument is conceptualized based on a multiple-level scale assessment for detecting significant health sector websites features. Criteria, indicators and sub-indicators of the instrument are analysed.

References

  1. European Commission, eEurope, an Information Society for All, Communication on A Commission Initiative for the Special European Council of Lisbon, 23--24 March 2000, European Commission: COM(1999) 687 final, Brussels, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. European Commission, i2010 - A European Information Society for growth and employment: COM (2005) 229 final, Brussels, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. European Commission, Europe 2020. A European Strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. 2010, European Commission: COM(2010) 2020 final, Brussels. 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. F.B. Wood, Siegel, E.R. Feldman, S. Love, C.B. Rodrigues, D. Malamud, M. Lagana, and J. Crafts, Web evaluation at the US National Institutes of Health: use of the American Customer Satisfaction Index online customer survey, Journal of medical Internet research, 10(1), 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. D. Kim, and H. Chang, Key functional characteristics in designing and operating health information websites for user satisfaction: An application of the extended technology acceptance model. International journal of medical informatics, 76(11), 2007, pp.790-800.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. J.M. Moreno, J.M. Del Castillo, C. Porcel, and E. Herrera-Viedma, A quality evaluation methodology for health-related websites based on a 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic approach, Soft Computing, 14(8), 2010, pp. 887--897. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. P.M. Shields, and H. Tajalli, Intermediate theory: The missing link in successful student scholarship, Journal of Public Affairs Education, 12(3), 2006, pp. 313--334Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. G. Llinás, D. Rodríguez-Iñesta, J.J. Mira, S. Lorenzo, and C. Aibar, A Comparison of Websites from Spanish, American and British Hospitals, Methods Inf Med 47, 2008, pp. 124--130.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. E.M. Lewiecki, L.A. Rudolph, G.M. Kiebzak, J.R. Chavez, and B.M. Thorpe, Assessment of osteoporosis-website quality, Osteoporosis international, 17(5), 2006, pp. 741--752.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. T.R. Huerta, J.L. Hefner, E.W. Ford, A.S. McAlearney, and N. Menachemi, Hospital website rankings in the United States: expanding benchmarks and standards for effective consumer engagement, Journal of medical Internet research 16(2), 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. T.R. Huerta, D.M. Walker, and E.W. Ford, An Evaluation and Ranking of Children's Hospital Websites in the United States, Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(8), 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. S.L. Tsai, and S.K. Chai, Developing and validating a nursing website evaluation questionnaire, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 49(4), 2005, pp. 406--413.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. E. Randeree, and H.R. Rao, E-health and assurance: curing hospital websites, International Journal of Electronic Healthcare, 1(1), 2004, pp. 33--46.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. R. Guardiola-Wanden-Berghe, J. Sanz-Valero, and C. Wanden-Berghe, Quality assessment of the Website for Eating Disorders: a systematic review of a pending challenge, Ciencia & Saude Coletiva, 17(9), 2012, pp. 2489--2497.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. G.A. Rezniczek, L. Küppers, H. Heuer, L.A. Hefler, B. Buerkle, and C.B. Tempfer, Quality of websites of obstetrics and gynecology departments: a cross-sectional study, BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth, 15(1), 2015, pp. 103.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. G. Maifredi, G. Orizio, M. Bressanelli, S. Domenighini, C. Gasparotti, E. Perini, L. Caimi, P.J. Schulz, and U. Gelatti, Italian hospitals on the web: a cross-sectional analysis of official websites, BMC medical informatics and decision making, 10(1), 2010, pp. 17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. R.U. Bilsel, G. Büyüközkan, and D. Ruan, A fuzzy preference? Ranking model for a quality evaluation of hospital web sites, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 21(11), 2006, pp. 1181--1197. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. M.A. Moslehifar, A.I. Noor, and S.C. Sandaran, Assessing the quality of trust features on website content of top hospitals for medical tourism consumers, Malaysian Journal of Communication, 2(1), 2016, pp. 469--489.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. F. Patsioura, S. Kitsiou, and A. Markos, Evaluation of Greek Public Hospital Websites, In ICE-B - International Conference on e-Business, Proceedings, 2009, pp. 223--229.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. J. Norum, Evaluation of Norwegian cancer hospitals' Web sites and explorative survey among cancer patients on their use of the Internet, Journal of Medical Internet Research, 3(4), 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. M.A. Calvo-Calvo, Quality and characteristics of websites of large Spanish hospitals, Revista Espanola de Documentacion Cientifica, 37(1), 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. X. Liu, Z. Bao, H. Liu, and Z. Wang, The quality and characteristics of leading general hospitals' Websites in China, Journal of medical systems, 35(6), 2011, pp. 1553--1562. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. J. García-Lacalle, V. Pina, and S. Royo, The unpromising quality and evolution of Spanish public hospital web sites, Online Information Review, 35(1), 2011, pp. 86--112.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. T.S. Gruca, and D.S. Wakefield, Hospital web sites: Promise and progress, Journal of Business research, 57(9) 2004, pp. 1021--1025.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. J.J. Mira, G. Llinás, O. Tomás, and V. Pérez-Jover, Quality of websites in Spanish public hospitals, Medical Informatics and the Internet in Medicine, 31(1), 2006, pp. 23--44.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. C. Mancini, M. Zedda, and A. Barbaro, Health information in Italian public health websites: moving from inaccessibility to accessibility, Health Information & Libraries Journal, 22(4), 2005, 276--285.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Authors' publication.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. S. Tardini, L. Bachmann, and L. Cantoni, eLearning and Continuing Education in Healthcare: the Hospitalitas Project, Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. M. Deakin, F. Campbell, A. Reid, Manchester as a digital powerhouse: governing the ICT-related developments. In Measuring E-government Efficiency, M. Bolivar (Ed), Public Administration and Information Technology 5, 2014, pp. 91--212.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. J.S. Shapiro, J. Kannry, M. Lipton, E. Goldberg, P. Conocenti, S. Stuard, B.M. Wyatt, G. Kuperman, Approaches to patient health information exchange and their impact on emergency medicine. Annals of emergency medicine, 48(4) (2006), 426--432.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. D. Heisey-Grove, V. Patel, T. Searcy, Physician electronic exchange of patient health information, 2014. ONC Data Brief, no. 31. Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology: Washington DC (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. R.T. Watson, G.M. Zinkhan, L.F. Pitt, Integrated internet marketing, Communications of the ACM 43(6) (2000), 97--102. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. S. Elling, L. Lentz, and M. De Jong, Website evaluation questionnaire: development of a research-based tool for evaluating informational websites. In International Conference on Electronic Government, 2007, pp. 293--304. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. A. Sharpe, Literature Review of Frameworks for Macro-indicators., Centre for the Study of Living Standards, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Towards Health Sector Web Presence Assessment: Defining Criteria and Indicators

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        ICEGOV '18: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance
        April 2018
        739 pages
        ISBN:9781450354219
        DOI:10.1145/3209415

        Copyright © 2018 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 4 April 2018

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        ICEGOV '18 Paper Acceptance Rate104of184submissions,57%Overall Acceptance Rate350of865submissions,40%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader