skip to main content
10.1145/3209582.3225203acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobihocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Utilizing In-Network Buffering for Scheduling and Routing in Data Center Networks

Published:26 June 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we aim to effectively utilize in-network buffering to schedule and route packets with low communication overhead, small delay and throughput optimality in fat-tree networks. While nearly zero in-network queueing can be guaranteed by performing precise time allocation and path assignment at network endpoints as in Fastpass, there is a high communication overhead, and buffer occupancy at the endpoints can become bottlenecks. By spreading scheduling functionalities to different network layers in a fat-tree network, the complexity can be decreased significantly at the cost of moderate buffer occupancy at intermediate switches. Inspired by this observation, we propose a simple dynamic pod scheduling (DPS) scheme, which performs scheduling at the granularity of pod units, each of which is paired to at most one other pod unit to transmit packets at each slot. By doing so, less information is required to arrange the packet transfers and inter-pod traffic will experience less downlink contentions. Through extensive evaluations, we find that DPS outperforms Fastpass in terms of delay while still guaranteeing throughput-optimality.

References

  1. G. Wang, D. G. Andersen, M. Kaminsky, et. al., "c-Through: Part-time Optics in Data Centers," in Proc. SIGCOMM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. M. Alizadeh, S. Yang, M. Sharif, et. al., "pFabric: Minimal Near-Optimal Datacenter Transport," in Proc. SIGCOMM, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. C.-H. Wang and T. Javidi, "Adaptive Policies for Scheduling with Reconfiguration Delay: An End-to-End Solution for All-Optical Data Centers," IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, vol. 25, no. 3, Jun. 2017. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. J. Perry, A. Ousterhout, A. Ousterhout, et. al., "Fastpass: A Centralized "Zero-Queue" Datacenter Network," in Proc. SIGCOMM, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. N. McKeown, A. Mekkittikul, V. Anantharam, et. al., "Achieving 100% Throughput in an Input-Queued Switch," IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 1260--1267, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. M. Al-Fares, A. Loukissas and A. Vahdat, "A Scalable, Commodity Data Center Network Architecture," in Proc. SIGCOMM, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  1. Utilizing In-Network Buffering for Scheduling and Routing in Data Center Networks

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      Mobihoc '18: Proceedings of the Eighteenth ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing
      June 2018
      329 pages
      ISBN:9781450357708
      DOI:10.1145/3209582

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 June 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate296of1,843submissions,16%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)8
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader