skip to main content
10.1145/3209626.3209628acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescprConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Attention-based View of Online Information Dissemination

Published:18 June 2018Publication History
First page image

References

  1. Ocasio, W. Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal (1997), 187--206.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. McKnight, D.H., Cummings, L.L., and Chervany, N.L. Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Academy of management review, 23, 3 (1998), 473--490.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Rousseau, D.M., Sitkin, S.B., Burt, R.S., and Camerer, C. Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of management review, 23, 3 (1998), 393--404.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Fan, M., Tan, Y., and Whinston, A.B. Evaluation and design of online cooperative feedback mechanisms for reputation management. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 17, 2 (2005), 244--254. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Chen, P.-Y., Dhanasobhon, S., and Smith, M.D. All reviews are not created equal: The disaggregate impact of reviews and reviewers at amazon. com. (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Chevalier, J.A., and Mayzlin, D. The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. Journal of marketing research, 43, 3 (2006), 345--354.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Gefen, D., and Straub, D.W. Consumer trust in B2C e-Commerce and the importance of social presence: experiments in e-Products and e-Services. Omega, 32, 6 (2004), 407--424.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Ghose, A., and Ipeirotis, P.G. Estimating the helpfulness and economic impact of product reviews: Mining text and reviewer characteristics. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 23, 10 (2011), 1498--1512. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Grazioli, S., and Jarvenpaa, S.L. Perils of Internet fraud: An empirical investigation of deception and trust with experienced Internet consumers. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans, 30, 4 (2000), 395--410. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Hu, N., Bose, I., Koh, N.S., and Liu, L. Manipulation of online reviews: An analysis of ratings, readability, and sentiments. Decision support systems, 52, 3 (2012), 674--684. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Hu, N., Liu, L., and Sambamurthy, V. Fraud detection in online consumer reviews. Decision support systems, 50, 3 (2011), 614--626. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Jensen, M.L., Averbeck, J.M., Zhang, Z., and Wright, K.B. Credibility of anonymous online product reviews: A language expectancy perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 30, 1 (2013), 293--324.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Miranda, S.M., Young, A., and Yetgin, E. Are social media emancipatory or hegemonic? Societal effects of mass media digitization. Mis Quarterly, 40, 2 (2016), 303--329. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Mudambi, S.M., and Schuff, D. What makes a helpful review? A study of customer reviews on Amazon. com. Mis Quarterly, 34, 1 (2010), 185--200. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Xiao, B., and Benbasat, I. Product-related deception in e-commerce: a theoretical perspective. Mis Quarterly, 35, 1 (2011), 169--196. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Xu, Q. Should I trust him? The effects of reviewer profile characteristics on eWOM credibility. Computers in Human Behavior, 33 (2014), 136--144. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Yin, D., Bond, S.D., and Zhang, H. Anxious or Angry? Effects of Discrete Emotions on the Perceived Helpfulness of Online Reviews. Mis Quarterly, 38, 2 (2014), 539--560. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. BrightLocal. Local Consumer Review Survey. 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Wu, P.F. In search of negativity bias: An empirical study of perceived helpfulness of online reviews. Psychology & Marketing, 30, 11 (2013), 971--984.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Ito, T.A., Larsen, J.T., Smith, N.K., and Cacioppo, J.T. Negative information weighs more heavily on the brain: the negativity bias in evaluative categorizations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 4 (1998), 887.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Li, X., and Hitt, L.M. Self-selection and information role of online product reviews. Information Systems Research, 19, 4 (2008), 456--474.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Sen, S., and Lerman, D. Why are you telling me this? An examination into negative consumer reviews on the web. Journal of interactive marketing, 21, 4 (2007), 76--94.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Carstensen, L.L. Evidence for a life-span theory of socioemotional selectivity. Current directions in Psychological science, 4, 5 (1995), 151--156 %\ 2015--2001--2016 2007:2047:2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Charles, S.T., and Carstensen, L.L. Social and emotional aging. Annual review of psychology, 61 (2010), 383--409.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Carstensen, L.L., Isaacowitz, D.M., and Charles, S.T. Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American psychologist, 54, 3 (1999), 165.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Melenhorst, A.-S., Rogers, W.A., and Bouwhuis, D.G. Older adults' motivated choice for technological innovation: evidence for benefit-driven selectivity. Psychology and aging, 21, 1 (2006), 190.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Fung, H.H., Carstensen, L.L., and Lutz, A.M. Influence of time on social preferences: implications for life-span development. Psychology and aging, 14, 4 (1999), 595.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Baltes, P.B. On the incomplete architecture of human ontogeny: Selection, optimization, and compensation as foundation of developmental theory. American psychologist, 52, 4 (1997), 366.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Baltes, P.B., and Baltes, M.M. Psychological perspectives on successful aging: The model of selective optimization with compensation. Successful aging: Perspectives from the behavioral sciences, 1, 1 (1990), 1--34.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Carstensen, L.L., Fung, H.H., and Charles, S.T. Socioemotional selectivity theory and the regulation of emotion in the second half of life. Motivation and Emotion, 27, 2 (2003), 103--123.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Attention-based View of Online Information Dissemination

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            SIGMIS-CPR'18: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM SIGMIS Conference on Computers and People Research
            June 2018
            216 pages
            ISBN:9781450357685
            DOI:10.1145/3209626

            Copyright © 2018 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 18 June 2018

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate300of480submissions,63%
          • Article Metrics

            • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

            Other Metrics

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader