Stacie Petter
ABSTRACT
Managing software projects is complex. Increasingly, organizations are using different methods and forms of teams to ensure software projects are developed on time, on budget, and meet functionality requirements. One factor that can affect the success of a software development team is the willingness of team members to be fully engaged and to share concerns throughout the effort. Employee silence is the unwillingness of an individual to express concerns. This exploratory research study examines three factors that influence a team member's choice to remain silent when participating in a distributed software project: the individual's level of experience, the role of the offending team member, and the individual's personal responsibility to report. Using a scenario-based experiment, this study finds that some of the factors that are assumed in other contexts of employee silence may not be related in the context of distributed teams in which there is a need to voice concerns among peers.
- Iacovou, C. L., Thompson, R. L. and Smith, H. J. Selective Status Reporting in Information Systems Projects: A Dyadic-Level Investigation. MIS Quarterly, 33, 4 (2009), 785-A785. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Snow, A. P. and Keil, M. The Challenge of Accurate Software Project Status Reporting: A Two-Stage Model Incorporating Status Errors and Reporting. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 49, 4 (2002), 491--504.Google Scholar
- Snow, A. P., Keil, M. and Wallace, L. The Effects of Optimistic and Pessimistic Biasing on Software Project Status Reporting. Information & Management, 44, 2 (2007), 130--141. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Keil, M. and Robey, D. Blowing the Whistle on Troubled Software Projects. Communications of the ACM, 44, 4 (April 2001), 87--93. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Park, C., Im, G. and Keil, M. Overcoming the Mum Effect in IT Project Reporting: Impacts of Fault Responsibility and Time Urgency. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9, 7 (2008), 409--431.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rosen, S. and Tesser, A. On Reluctance to Communicate Undesirable Information: The MUM Effect. Sociometry, 33, 3 (1970), 253--263.Google Scholar
- Thompson, R. L., Smith, H. J. and Iacovou, C. L. The Linkage between Reporting Quality and Performance in IS Projects. Information & Management, 44, 2 (2007), 196--205. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jain, R. P., Simon, J. C. and Poston, R. S. Mitigating Vendor Silence in Offshore Outsourcing: An Empirical Investigation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27, 4 (2011), 261--297. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ramingwong, S. and Sajeev, A. Offshore Outsourcing: The Risk of Keeping Mu. Communications of the ACM, 50, 8 (2007), 101--103. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Keil, M., Smith, H. J., Pawlowski, S. and Jin, L. "Why Didn't Somebody Tell Me?" Climate, Information Assymetry, and Bad News about Troubled Projects. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 35, 2 (2004), 65--84. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Smith, H. J., Keil, M. and Depledge, G. Keeping Mum as the Project Goes Under: Toward an Explanatory Model. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18, 2 (2001), 189--227. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Smith, H. J. and Keil, M. The Reluctance to Report Bad News on Troubled Software Projects: A Theoretic Model. Information Systems Journal, 13 (2003), 69--95.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ramesh, B., Cao, L. and Baskerville, R. Agile Requirements Engineering Practices and Challenges: An Empirical Study. Information Systems Journal, 20, 5 (2010), 449--480.Google Scholar
- Schwaber, K. and Sutherland, J. V. Software in 30 Days: How Agile Managers Beat the Odds, Delight Their Customers, and Leave Competitors in the Dust. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2012. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Persson, J. S., Mathiassen, L. and Aaen, I. Agile Distributed Software Development: Enacting Control through Media and Context. Information Systems Journal, 22, 6 (2012), 411--433. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pinder, C. C. and Harlos, K. P. Employee Silence: Quiescence and Acquiescence as Response to Perceived Injustice. JAI Press, City, 2001.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bowen, F. and Blackmon, K. Spirals of Silence: The Dynamic Effects of Diversity on Organizational Voice. Journal of Management Studies, 40, 6 (September 2003), 1393--1417.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Brinsfield, C. T., Edwards, M. S. and Greenberg, J. Voice and Silence in Organizations: Historical Review and Current Conceptualizations. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, City, 2009.Google Scholar
- Detert, J. R., Burris, E. R. and Harrison, D. A. Debunking Four Myths about Employee Silence. Harvard Business Review, 88, 6 (June 2010), 26.Google Scholar
- Milliken, F. J., Morrison, E. W. and Hewlin, P. F. An Exploratory Study of Employee Silence: Issues that Employees Don't Communicate Upward and Why. Journal of Management Studies, 40, 6 (September 2003), 1453--1476.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Morrison, E. W. and Milliken, F. J. Organizational Silence: A Barrier to Change and Development in a Pluralistic World. Academy of Management Review, 25, 4 (2000), 706--725.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tangirala, S. and Ramanujam, R. Employee Silence on Critical Work Issues: The Cross Level Effects of Procedural Justice Climate. Personnel Psychology, 61 (2008), 37--68.Google Scholar
- Tangirala, S. and Ramanujam, R. Exploring Nonlinearity in Employee Voice: The Effects of Personal Control and Organizational Identification. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 6 (2008), 1189--1203.Google Scholar
- Venkataramani, V. and Tangirala, S. When and Why Do Central Employees Speak Up? An Examination of Mediating and Moderating Variables. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 3 (2010), 582--591.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Vakola, M. and Bouradas, D. Antecedents and Consequences of Organisational Silence: An Empirical Investigation. Employee Relations, 27, 5 (2005), 441--458.Google Scholar
- Keil, M., Im, G. and Mahring, M. Reporting Bad News on Software Projects: The Effects of Culturally Constituted Views of Face-Saving. Information Systems Journal, 17, 1 (2007), 59--87.Google Scholar
- Tan, B. C. Y., Smith, H. J., Keil, M. and Montealegre, R. Reporting Bad News about Software Projects: Impact of Organizational Climate and Information Asymmetry in an Individualistic and a Collectivistic Culture. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 50, 1 (2003), 64--77.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Near, J. P. and Miceli, M. P. Organizational Dissidence: The Case of Whistle-Blowing. Journal of Business Ethics, 4, 1 (1985), 1--16.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Keil, M., Tiwana, A., Sainsbury, R. and Sneha, S. Toward a Theory of Whistleblowing Intentions: A Benefit-to-Cost Differiential Perspective. Decision Sciences, 41, 4 (2010), 787--812.Google Scholar
- van Dyne, L., Ang, S. and Botero, I. C. Conceptualizing Employee Silence and Employee Voice as Multidimensional Constructs. Journal of Management Studies, 40, 6 (2003), 1360--1392.Google Scholar
- Davis, A., Murphy, J., Owens, D., Khazanchi, D. and Zigurs, I. Avatars, People, and Virtual Worlds: Foundations for Research in Metaverses. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 10, 2 (2009), 90--117.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Petter, S. and Petter, R. To Tell or Not to Tell: Examining Team Silence and Voice in Online Ad Hoc Teams. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems (Shanghai, China, 2011). Association for Information Systems, {insert City of Publication},{insert 2011 of Publication}.Google Scholar
- French, J. P. R. and Raven, B. The Bases of Social Power. Harper and Row, City, 1960.Google Scholar
- Dozier, J. B. and Miceli, M. P. Potential Predictors of Whistle-Blowing: A Prosocial Behavior Perspective. Academy of Management Review, 10, 4 (1985), 823--838.Google Scholar
- Petter, S., Randolph, A., DeJong, J. and Robinson, A. T. The Trouble with Troubled Projects: Keeping Mum during Times of Crisis. AIS Transactions on Replication Research, 2, 1 (2016).Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ringle, C. M., Wende, S. and Becker, J.-M. SmartPLS 3. SmartPLS GmbH, http://www.smartpls.com., City, 2015.Google Scholar
- Greenberg, P. S., Greenberg, R. H. and Lederer, A. Y. Creating and Sustaining Trust in Virtual Teams. Business Horizons, 50, 4 (2007), 325--333.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Katzenbach, J. R. and Smith, D. K. The Discipline of Teams. Harvard Business Review (March-April 1993), 111--119.Google Scholar
- Zigurs, I. Leadership in Virtual Teams: Oxymoron or Opportunity. Organizational Dynamics, 31, 4 (2003), 339--351.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- If You Can't Say Something Nice: Factors Contributing to Team Member Silence in Distributed Software Project Teams
Recommendations
Mitigating Vendor Silence in Offshore Outsourcing: An Empirical Investigation
The tendency to remain silent about project-related issues can contribute to suboptimal project performance or project failure. Prior research in offshore outsourcing suggests that client managers should play a critical role to induce offshore vendors' ...
Work outcomes and job design for contract versus permanent information systems professionals on software development teams
Organizations have significantly increased their use of contracting in information systems (IS), hiring contractors to work with permanent professionals. Based on theories of social exchange and social comparison, we hypothesize differences in work ...
The Influence Mechanism between Workplace Ostracism and Employee Silence: Based on The Resource Perspective
EBIMCS '20: Proceedings of the 2020 3rd International Conference on E-Business, Information Management and Computer ScienceBased on the conservation of resource theory, this paper constructs an intermediary model of workplace rejection through emotional exhaustion on employees' silent behavior, and examines the moderating role of union support in this model. Through the ...
Comments